Indonesia is a constitutional democracy. The authority of the Constitutional Court in examining and deciding cases of disputes over the results of regional head elections has become an old song worked on by the Constitutional Court itself and the Constitutional Court has often withdrawn and canceled its authority in terms of disputes over the results of regional head elections and caused legal uncertainty related to regional head election issues. Then the Constitutional Court ruled that the articles petitioned by the Respondents were contrary to the 1945 Constitution and had no binding legal force. The Constitutional Court is authorized to hear disputes over the results of regional head elections as long as there is no law regulating this matter. Article 1 of Law No. 22/2017 on Regional Head Elections is included in the Election regime, which is carried out directly, publicly, freely, confidentially, honestly and fairly. It is rumored that the 2024 elections will be the cornerstone of the history of simultaneous national elections. This study aims to determine the role of the constitutional court in resolving direct election disputes and to determine the responsibility of special judicial bodies in direct election disputes.

Perpetrators and parties related to misuse of social media in general elections, such as spreading fake news or hoaxes and spreading hate speech, may be subject to criminal sanctions as stated in the provisions of the article of the law. The method used in preparing this research is normative juridical with a conceptual approach and a statutory approach, especially the  ITE Law, the Criminal Code to further examine law enforcement regarding the misuse of social media in building public opinion in the 2024 General Election (Pemilu).In practice, Law concerning Information and Electronic Transactions itself is still not effective because it is seen as tending to limit freedom of expression and bias in its implementation. There are no standard standards for determining activities that can be considered misuse of social media. Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections does not regulate the anticipation of misuse of social media in general elections using a repressive approach or imposing criminal sanctions.

Most of the people of Tamblang Village have a livelihood as farmers. So that the thick ancestral traditions and culture are still carried out intact in this village. Tamblang is a village located in the Kubutambahan sub-district, Buleleng Regency, Bali Province, Indonesia. Customary laws or awig-awig are still the basis for behavior in the community. Regulations regarding the existence and rights of customary law communities regarding customary land in Tamblang Village are one of them in Awig-Awig Tamblang Traditional Village, Kubutambahan District, which shows that the existence and rights of indigenous peoples have been accepted within the legal framework applicable in traditional villages. The Tamblang customary law community is the indigenous people of North Bali who have lived for generations based on local cultural wisdom. Customary laws or awig-awig are still the basis for behavior in society. This arrangement of rights and obligations towards customary land is the basis for community engagement by the residents of the Tamblang customary village. The purpose of this study is to know and understand the existence of awig-awig and perarem in the regulation of customary land rights and obligations. The author uses an empirical research method using an approach through laws and conceptual methods. The results of this study can be concluded that, it is expected to maintain, maintain, and maintain customary law values. This regulation certainly gives hope to customary law communities to get recognition and protection of their rights, namely customary territories, customary law, assets and/or customary objects as well as institutions/government systems.