This research aims to determine the effectiveness of ownership of operational permits for wastewater disposal installations as factors inhibiting this effectiveness in the Randangan District Health Center. This research is a sociological or empirical study, with the aim of presenting as complete data as possible regarding the effectiveness of permit ownership for Community Health Centers in Randangan District, as stated in Law Number 32 of 2009. The types of data used include primary data and secondary data, and the data collection techniques used are field research and literature study. Based on the research in the results of the discussion, conclusions are drawn; Firstly, the Motolohu Community Health Center in Randangan District has been operating an IPAL since 2017 but until 2023 it has not received a permit from the Pohuwato Regency Environmental Service, even though according to the regulations, IPALs that have been operated must have a permit. Second, factors that hinder effectiveness include legal factors, law enforcement factors, legal advice and facilities, and community factors.

Illegal mining itself is a mining activity or extracting agricultural products carried out by the community or a business entity or we can call it a company where this activity does not have a business permit and also does not use the principles regarding how to mine in accordance with existing regulations or not. use mining methods properly and correctly. The basic mining laws that apply in Indonesia are stated in the Mining UlUl Number 3 of 2020 concerning amendments to UlUl Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining, mining excavation itself consists of several types. Starting from strategic minerals or group a minerals, vital minerals or group c, and finally, group c minerals. In Indonesia itself we can certainly find cases of illegal mining in various regions, that is why enforcement efforts should be carried out as best as possible in order to reduce the growth rate of existing illegal mining which of course is to guarantee or increase state income through existing mining businesses. certainly legal in the eyes of the law.

The aim of this research is to find out the form of customary law that is resolved in customary justice in the Deisa Toiruakat community, Dumoiga subdistrict, Boilaang Moingoindoiw district and to find out the legal process of customary law in Deisa Toiruakat, Dumoiga subdistrict, Boilaang Moingoindoiw district. The Meitoidei Peineilitian that is used is a combined type of research between Noirmative Huikuim Peineilitian and Eimpirical Huikuim Peineilitian. Noirmative-Eimpirical Huikuim Research is a type of research theory which in this case combines noirmative legal science which is coincided with the addition of data or empirical science. The research results obtained by the customary settlement process in Toruakat Village do not violate existing legal norms in Indonesia because the Guhanga Lipu (Traditional Institution) of Toruakat Village and customary courts are recognized by the Government both through laws, regional regulations and village regulations. The conclusion is that there are differences between the traditional regulations of Toruakat Village and the practice of carrying out customary trials that are carried out, because the sound of the articles mentioned in the trial process is different from the sound of the articles in Toruakat Village Regulation Number: 01 of 2020 Concerning the Customary and Customary Procedures of Toruakat Village and the number of sanctions imposed This also differs from the provisions for giving sanctions in the village regulations and in the research process the researcher found that indeed the traditional council did not comply with the traditional village regulations of Toruakat Village, they only relied on knowledge from their parents and from books that their ancestors had left to them.