With increasingly sophisticated technological developments, all sales and purchase transactions can be carried out online through various platforms including websites, social media, e-commerce and other platforms. However, online transactions can cause legal problems. One of the legal problems that often involves the sale and purchase agreement between the seller and the buyer is a breach of contract. Court Decision Number 629/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.Sel is one of the cases of online sale and purchase breach involving Celvin as the buyer as the Plaintiff with Satrya as the owner of the brand "Namastudios" as the Defendant. This article raises the formulation of the problem regarding the legal remedies available to the injured party in the case of an obligation in the decision Number 629/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.Sel involving default in online buying and selling transactions and the implications of the decision Number 629/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.Sel on consumer protection in online buying and selling transactions in Indonesia.
 

"Indonesia Golden 2045" is a big vision with the goal of making Indonesia a developed country by 2045, on the other hand poverty is still a serious problem facing Indonesian society. The government has launched a number of social assistance programmes to reduce the poverty rate and improve the well-being of the population. Despite this, the effectiveness of these programmes is still a matter of debate among several parties. In this context, research into student perspectives on the effectiveness of government programmes in particular Cash Direct Assistance (BLT) in poverty alleviation efforts becomes relevant and important. In order to obtain real comparisons as well as actual information relating to the existence of government social assistance programmes, the data collection system on this study uses an online survey in the form of a questionnaire containing questions about the perspective related to the problems of the BLT program with students of the Faculty of Law of the National University of Development “Veteran” Jakarta (UPNVJ) as the target respondents continued with a review of data from previous sources. The research is expected to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the extent to which government social assistance programmes benefit communities and any obstacles they encounter in their implementation.

An agreement is when a person commits to another person to do something or when both parties commit to carry out something. However, in practice, there are often cases of default, where there are parties who do not fulfill their obligations in accordance with the contents of the agreement, as happened in the case of a kiosk sale and purchase agreement in Kupang District Court Decision Number 132.18/PDT.G/2016/PN.KPG. This article aims to analyze the occurrence of default in the kiosk sale and purchase agreement and analyze the judge's decision in resolving the default with the principles of justice. This article adopts a qualitative approach by using the normative juridical method and conducting a literature study. The results of this research analysis explain that the judge's decision in this case has fulfilled the necessary conditions. The Defendant has been found in default by the Panel of Judges and is entitled to pay the remaining money according to the agreement letter. The principles of legal certainty and justice have also been applied properly by considering all evidence and witness testimony before making a decision.