This research discusses the increasing child violence in Bintan Regency every year. The purpose of this research is to analyze the implementation of collaborative governance in addressing violence against children. The research uses a descriptive qualitative method with data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documentation. The theory used is the collaborative governance theory by Ansell & Gash, which consists of five indicators: face to face, trust building, commitment to process, shared understanding, and intermediate outcomes. The conclusion of this research shows that collaborative governance in addressing child violence in Bintan Regency has been implemented, with collaboration between the government, child protection agencies, and the community. The indicators of face to face, trust building, and shared understanding have been quite good through communication and coordination among the actors. However, the indicators of commitment to process and intermediate outcomes still face challenges such as changes in positions, sectoral egos, and time constraints. Although services for victims have started to improve, the rate of child violence remains high and many cases are resolved peacefully. An increase in commitment and coordination is needed to strengthen protection efforts and elevate the status of Child-Friendly Districts.

Bintan Regency is a Regency with the largest decrease in the open unemployment rate for the 2022-2023 period in the Riau Islands. This study aims to determine the strategy of the Bintan Regency Regional Government in reducing unemployment in Bintan Regency. The research method used is qualitative descriptive research with interview and documentation data collection techniques. The results of this study indicate that the Bintan Regency Manpower Office has mostly implemented its strategy well from the organizational strategy already having good strategies and policies. The program strategy has a positive impact on the workforce in improving skills and prioritizing the placement of local workers. The resource support strategy is adequate both in terms of human resources, finance, technology and infrastructure. Institutional strategy, responsible for performance targets and exercising its authority in reducing unemployment.

Village-Owned Enterprises are institutions that operate in the field of managing village economic resources which aim to optimize village assets, improve community businesses and increase village income. This increasingly narrow agricultural area has caused the people of Batu Belanak Village to complain because some of their harvests have failed, such as coconuts, the quality of the coconut harvest is not good so it is not suitable for sale and consumption by the local community. This research method uses qualitative research. The data collection technique is using interviews and documentation. There are 4 indicators according to Siagian's role theory (2000:142-150), namely Stabilizer, Innovator, Pioneer and Modernizer. The results of this research show that the role as a stabilizer for the sale of electricity tokens and telephone credit, cattle fattening is one of the BUMDes programs that is running in Batu Belanak Village, the need for cattle, especially Midai Island, the price of sacrificial cattle is too high and the cows that come out will get big profits, fishing gear for Village BUMDes fishermen Batu Belanak provides credit for goods. BUMDes provides credit for goods in installments. The role of BUMDes innovator in Batu Belanak Village will be to create a household credit program. The government's role as a pioneer is to first implement innovation to build cooperation with the community in terms of advancing the village. Role as a modernizer from traditional to modern conditions.

The election supervision function is the authority of Bawaslu, thus Bawaslu needs participatory supervision. The participatory supervision carried out by Bawaslu is by involving community groups such as NGOs, and other organizations. Therefore, Bawaslu Bintan formed Saka Adhyasta Pemilu to assist in overseeing the implementation of elections and following up on violations that occur. This study aims to evaluate the quality of participatory supervision carried out by Saka Adhyasta Pemilu in the 2024 elections in Bintan Regency. The research method used is qualitative with data collection through interviews, field notes, and official documents. There are 4 indicators of participatory supervision according to Pasaribu (2011), namely monitoring, inspection, guidance and direction, and correction. The results showed that the indicators of monitoring, inspection, and correction were still not effective, as seen from the lack of violation reports submitted to Bawaslu by Saka Adhyasta Pemilu. However, in the guidance and direction indicator, it has proven effective because Bawaslu has provided education on monitoring and preventing disputed violations in the 2024 elections in Bintan Regency. The factors that make participatory supervision carried out by Saka Adhyasta Pemilu not run well are because of their young age, lack of critical attitude, lack of experience and minimal knowledge of elections.

The implementation of democracy at the village level can be proof that political development in Indonesia has developed rapidly by involving local communities, so that they are able to carry out the functions of regional government power in order to achieve the goal of advancing and prospering people's lives. Non-voting behavior are a group of people who are unwilling and negligent in giving their voting rights in elections for various reasons, whether in legislative elections, regional elections, presidential elections or village head elections. Non-voting behavior are also called blanks or abstentions in elections that are limited to an organization, company or institution. Voter absence at an election is closely related to voter dissatisfaction or satisfaction. In Kote Village, non-voting behavior has a large number compared to other villages in Singkep Pesisir District. The existence of this phenomenon certainly has a cause for non-voting behavior by the Kote Village Community. The aim of this research is to determine the factors causing non-voting behavior in Kote Village, Lingga Regency and the main factors causing non-voting behavior in Kote Village, Lingga Regency. The research method used in this research is a descriptive qualitative method. Data collection was carried out through interviews with several informants who were related to the research. The results of the research show that the non-voting behavior carried out by the people of Kote Village is caused by several things, namely the attitude of the community who are less concerned about the ongoing Village Head Election which is based on the lack of influence of the Village Head Election on the community. Some communities find it difficult to contribute to village policy making and do not understand the ongoing village election system. Apart from that, there are people who believe that the Village Head candidate they support will win or lose in the ongoing Village Head Election so they feel there is no need to come to vote. However, the reason why most people in Kote Village do not vote is because of work factors that cannot be left behind due to economic needs and educational factors, especially students who study outside the area and are unable to return to Kote Village to carry out the Village Head election.