In Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, there is an article that prohibits obscene acts, which is regulated in Article 76E which reads: "Everyone is prohibited from committing violence or threats of violence, coercing, committing tricks, committing a series of lies, or persuading children to commit or allow obscene acts to be committed." Furthermore, Article 76D which reads: "Everyone is prohibited from committing violence or threats of violence to force a child to have intercourse with him or with another person This research was conducted with the aim of finding out how to protect the law for children who are victims of criminal acts of obscenity and how to prove and apply the law to criminal acts of obscenity committed by children. . The research method conducted in this study is a normative juridical research method so that it can be concluded as follows: 1. Child protection is regulated in Law Number 23 of 2002. In addition to Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection in protecting victims of child molestation, Law No. 13 of 2006 concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims can also protect victims of child abuse and victims of other criminal acts.2. Evidence in the crime of obscenity uses evidence in accordance with the Criminal Code. The valid evidence according to Law No. 8 of 1981 is regulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code which consists of witness statements, expert statements, letter of recommendation, and information of the defendant. In the application of the law against child molesters, Article 82 of Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection can be applied by using the mechanism and system of child justice, namely Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System.

The transfer of land rights is a legal event/action that results in the transfer of rights from one legal subject to another legal subject, thereby causing the loss of authority over the land. Land transfer refers to the process or action that changes land ownership from one party to another. This can occur through a variety of means, including sale, inheritance, gift, or voluntary or forced surrender. For example, if someone sells a house to someone else, that is a transfer of land. This research includes normative legal research, so the legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials that will be used as a source in this research is library research, namely collecting legal materials by reading statutory regulations, official documents, journals, articles from the internet, and other literature that is closely related to The issues discussed are based on secondary legal materials. Transfer of land rights is a right to transfer land rights from an individual to a legal entity. Legal transitions usually occur due to legal acts and legal events. The implementation of the transfer of land rights can occur due to transfer or transfer. Switching, for example due to inheritance of Decision Number. 13/Pdt.G/2020/Pn Tbt The Panel of Judges rejected the Defendants' exception in its entirety in the main case, rejecting the plaintiff's claim in its entirety. Decision Number 422/Pdt/2020/PT Mdn that accepts the bandi application from the Comparator's Attorney for the original Plaintiff based on the Decision of the Tebing Tinggi District Court Number 13/Pdt.G/2020/Pn Tbt, dated 20 July 2020 which is appealed in the exception and rejects the exception Appellee 1 and Appellee II, in the main case, canceled the decision of the Tebing Tinggi District Court which was appealed. At the cassation level, Decision Number 1928 K/Pdt/2021, namely granting the cassation petition from the cassation applicants consisting of the Chair of the Community Empowerment Institution, formerly the Community Social Institution, represented by Iskandar and Lalang Village, Rambutan District, Tebing Tinggi City, represented by Lura Adi Supeno, thereby canceling the Medan High Court Decision Number 422/PDT/2020/PT Medan and dated 21 October 2020 which annulled the Decision of the Tebing Tinggi District Court Number 13/Pdt.G/2020/PN TBT dated 20 July 2020.

The dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia over the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan continued throughout the years until 1997. The issue of Sipadan and Ligitan islands was resolved by international law through the International Court of Justice. The two islands located in the middle of Indonesia, precisely in the Makassar Strait, were finally won by the Malaysian side on December 17, 2002. The theory used in this research is the theory of legal protection. The theory of legal protection is very relevant to the research made here, because there is a need for legal protection regarding territorial boundaries in the territorial sovereignty of the State of Indonesia. The research method used regarding international legal protection of the Sipadan-Ligitan island dispute is carried out by means of qualitative descriptive research. The technique or instrument of data collection used is library research by studying various books as literature, official documents, laws and regulations, results of previous research, and other literature sources related to the problems studied. The decision of the international court on December 17, 2002 in its decision gave sovereignty over the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan to Malaysia, the international court declared Malaysia as the most entitled party to the two islands based on three main statements that were used as the basis for claims by both countries.