This research aims to (1) determine the level of stress coping in final year male students of the Guidance and Counseling Study Program at Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta. (2) Knowing the level of stress coping in final year female students of the Guidance and Counseling Study Program at Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta. (3) Knowing the differences in levels of coping with academic stress between male and female students in the final year of the Guidance and Counseling Study Program at Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta. This type of research is comparative quantitative. The subjects in this research were final year students of the Guidance and Counseling study program at Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, totaling 60 students from a total population of 77 students. The questionnaire was prepared based on aspects of coping stress according to Lazarus and Folkman (1984). The instrument's Alpha Chronbach reliability coefficient value is 0.947 with 51 valid items. The results of this study show that there is no difference in the level of academic stress coping in final year students of the Guidance and Counseling study program at Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, seen from the significance value of 0.058 > ? = 0.05. Students and female students have a high level of academic stress coping. The frequency of students' academic stress coping level was 23 (76.7%), while female students were 17 (56.7%).

This study aims to find out the difference in self-acceptance rates between students and 7th grade students at SMP Negeri 1 Yogyakarta during puberty. This study also aims to find out the level of self-acceptance in students and students separately. This study uses a comparative quantitative method with 60 students out of a total of 192 students. Data was collected through a Google Form questionnaire containing 47 items based on aspects of self-acceptance according to Hurlock (2004). The reliability of the instrument was tested using Alpha Cronbach with a coefficient of 0.917. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the level of self-acceptance between students and students. Based on data analysis, 20.7% of students are in the medium category, 65.5% in the low category, and 13.8% in the very low category. For female students, 6.5% were in the very high category, 3.2% in the high category, 61.3% in the medium category, 22.6% in the low category, and 6.5% in the very low category. These results are used as the basis for the preparation of social personal guidance topics in the Guidance and Counseling Study Program, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta.

Research objectives: 1) to determine whether there is a difference in self-resilience levels among Batak students based on gender, 2) to identify factors influencing the resilience of transient students, 3) to assess the level of self-resilience between male and female students, 4) to identify low-scoring resilience scale items that can be proposed as counseling topics. This study employed a quantitative approach with a comparative research design. Data collection utilized a survey method involving 60 respondents, comprising 30 male and 30 female Batak students at Sanata Dharma University. The validity test confirmed 60 valid items out of 72, and reliability was established with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.756. Data analysis included an Independent Sample T-test to examine differences. The findings revealed: 1) no significant difference in resilience levels between male and female students 2) the resilience levels among male students were categorized as very high (17%), high (73%), and moderate (10%), 3) while female students were categorized as very high (17%) and high (83%), 4) several resilience scale items were identified as scoring low, suggesting areas that could benefit from counseling interventions.