This article discusses the legal dynamics of inheritance of different religions between the testator and the heirs in Indonesia by comparing the inheritance law in the Civil Code and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The method in this article is legal research. This research is prescriptive, which is to provide an assessment of something that should be done. This research uses a case approach, namely by examining the legal reasons (ratio decidendi) used by the judge in the decision or determination. The results of this article conclude that according to inheritance law in the Civil Code, there is no recognition of religious differences as a barrier to inheritance, in other words, it is valid for people of different religions to become heirs or inherit. Whereas in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), religious differences are a barrier for someone to get an inheritance from the heir. Although Islamic law and KHI do not recognize inheritance of different religions, the case of inheritance of different religions between the testator and the heir in Indonesia in several Supreme Court Decisions in Indonesia can be concluded that the Panel of Judges who decide cases regarding heirs of different religions with the testator can obtain inheritance through compulsory probate.

The development of AI and its ease of use in cyberspace raises various legal problems. This situation is because AI can take actions that could potentially lead to illegal activities. Therefore, to overcome the problems that arise from the use of AI, legislation is needed to regulate it. This research aims to analyze the legal provisions for the use of AI in Indonesian Law. This research is qualitative research with a normative legal approach, and the data analysis method used is qualitative juridical. The results showed that the use of AI in the legal field has been widely carried out, including it can be used to predict case outcomes and make strategic recommendations. AI can also estimate the cost needed to solve cases. In addition, AI facilitates the development of rules and regulations and the creation of contracts. However, with the use of AI, the legal provisions governing it are considered insufficient. In addition to Statute Number 19 of 2016 Regarding Amendments to Statute Number 11 of 2008 Regarding Electronic Information and Transactions and Regulation of Government Number 71 of 2019 Regarding the Execution of Electronic Systems and Transactions, there must be new and specific regulations governing the use of artificial intelligence.