This paper intends to investigate the factors taken into account by the judge in determining the absence in the case of PT Bentoel Internasional Investama at the South Jakarta District Court, analyze the procedures for managing assets whose owners are absent based on the applicable regulations in Indonesia, and investigate the compliance of the procedures for managing shares as afwezidheid assets in the case of PT Bentoel Internasional Investama conducted by the Jakarta Balai Harta Peninggalan (BHP) with the regulations in Indonesia. This study is an empirical legal one using a qualitative methodology. Primary and secondary data are the forms of the information applied. Data collecting methods used are literature reviews and interviews. The interviews were carried out applying flexible topic development based on interview rules. This work employs approaches of descriptive analysis. According to the findings of this investigation, the judge decided on the absence petition of PT Bentoel Internasional Investama based on pertinent legal reasons, legal precedents, and facts provided by the petitioner in view of Under the Indonesian Civil Code, Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia No. 27 of 2013, and Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. M.02-HT.05.10 of 2005 the process for managing shares as assets whose owners are absent (boedel afwezigheid) by the Jakarta BHP is governed. Regarding PT Bentoel Internasional Investama, the management of afwezigheid shares was done in line with Indonesian laws by means of an application to the South Jakarta District Court, which designated the Jakarta BHP as the legal administrator. This process complies with Articles 463–465 of the Civil Code and Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Number AHU.UM.01.01-235, including public notification of share status in mass media, management, recording, safekeeping of collective share certificates, and BHP reports share management to the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) and the Attorney General's Office and handles official and material tests. Since no objections were found, the Jakarta BHP filed none.

This research aims to analyze the form of protection for joint assets and the rights of each party in the marriage agreement as well as the implications of the marriage agreement for husband and wife in limited partnership (CV) businesses. The research method used by the researcher is normative research with prescriptive research characteristics whose research approach is a statutory approach and a case approach. The data collection technique used is literature study, with the syllogism method and deductive thinking as an analysis technique. The results of the research highlight the role of marriage agreements as a form of protection not only for joint assets but also the rights of husband and wife business actors, especially CVs. Apart from that, it was also found that the marriage agreement was a form of protection from the risks associated with the CV business.
 
 

This research aims to analyze the indicators of the principle of abuse of circumstances in the consideration of judges who give rise to legal consequences of the existence of abuse of circumstances in economic excellence in an agreement. The research method in this journal is normative legal research. The nature of research in this journal is prescriptive. The research approach used is the legislation approach and case approach. Primary legal materials in this journal, namely the Civil Code, jurisprudence, and court decisions. As for secondary legal materials, namely book literature, legal journals, and other relevant literature. The results of the study indicate that the case in Supreme Court Decision Number 1395 K/Pdt/2017 has proven that there is an abuse of circumstances in economic excellence.