Criminal liability is a form of imposing punishment on the perpetrator of a crime because of his/her unlawful actions. In other words, criminal liability determines whether a person will be acquitted or convicted of a crime that has been committed. This process involves the transfer of the existing punishment for the crime to the perpetrator. This research is a normative research. The results of the research show that Criminal liability for perpetrators who participate in the crime of murder, anyone who intentionally helps, plans, or plays an active role in murder can be held criminally responsible, either as the main perpetrator or as a participant (medeplichtige or medepleger). The sanctions imposed depend on the role and level of involvement of each perpetrator, in accordance with the principle of criminal responsibility and the element of error in criminal law. This must be reviewed carefully by the judge so that in making a decision on the defendant, it can have a deterrent effect on the perpetrator and not cause unrest for the victim's family regarding the decision handed down by the judge. The judge's decision to impose a light sentence on the perpetrator who participated in a crime that resulted in the death of a person shows an imbalance in law enforcement. This injustice can be caused by the judge's non-objective considerations, weak evidence, or lack of bias towards justice for the victim. This kind of decision risks weakening the deterrent effect and public trust in the justice system.

Internet users in the use of information have given rise to two opposite sides, where on the one hand it is easier in terms of access and utilization of information, while on the other hand it causes various kinds of illegal acts, one of which is copyright infringement in the form of film piracy which is currently inserted through illegal streaming sites resulting in losses for the creators of cinematographic works. This of course violates the ITE Law and the Joint Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights and the Minister of Communication and Informatics concerning the Implementation of Content Closure and/or User Access Rights, Copyright Infringement and/or Related Rights in Electronic Systems. This research is a normative juridical research using a legislative and conceptual approach, using legal materials from literature and the internet as a source of legal materials. The results of the study show: (1) The form of legal protection for the creators of cinematographic works in film piracy on illegal streaming sites is reviewed from the ITE Law in a preventive manner regulated in Articles 23-25, Article 25, Article 32 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the ITE Law and has been repressively regulated in Article 48 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the ITE Law and the Joint Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights & the Minister of Communication and Information related to Content Closure. (2) The effectiveness of the legal protection provided by the government to the creators of cinematographic works in the piracy of films on illegal streaming sites provided by the government through the ITE Law and the Joint Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights and the Minister of Communication and Informatics related to site blocking cannot be said to be effective until now because the legal factor itself has not sufficiently accommodated the protection of creators clearly in the event of film piracy on illegal streaming sites.

The Timorese tribe has a pamali or prohibition not to be related or marry the same clan in one tribe or blood relations for people who are related by blood will be subject to customary sanctions by the traditional chief. The case of incest rape occurred in Nuapin Village, Fatumnasi District, South Central Timor Regency, this rape resulted in the victim experiencing an unwanted pregnancy by the victim and her family because the victim was pregnant with a child from her blood family which is prohibited in Timorese customary law, so she chose to have an abortion. Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning health and its Implementing Regulations excludes the act of abortion due to rape even though it is prohibited in the Criminal Code. In this case, the act of abortion is carried out as a result of incest rape and will be reviewed based on customary criminal law. The type of research used in this study is empirical research with a sociological juridical approach, namely field research whose object is about events and phenomena that occur in society. Data collection was carried out with two events, namely interviews with 4 people and literature studies. The data obtained were then presented in a qualitative descriptive manner. The results of this study show that: (1) The existence of criminal law prohibits the legalization of abortion due to incest rape, abortion is only allowed in emergency medical conditions in accordance with Law Number 36 of 2009 and Government Regulation Number 61 of 2014. (2). The legality of customary criminal law for abortion due to incest is carried out in Nuapin Village because it is considered to violate customary and pamali law.
 

This study aims to find out what are the forms of modes in the crime of Money Laundering Using Illegal Cryptocurrency Media  as well as Criminal Law policies in an effort to overcome the occurrence of Money Laundering Crimes through  illegal Cryptocurrency  Media. To answer the above problems, this Research Method uses the Normative Law research method which focuses on research on written regulations or legislation or research based on rules or norms that apply in society. The results of the discussion in this study show that, (1)  The mode of operation used by the perpetrators in the crime of money laundering through Cryptocurrency media  is by trading and investment methods along with several other methods. The perpetrators take advantage of the transaction system on cryptocurrencies that are closed or anonymous so that the perpetrators get an opening to launch criminal acts. 2) Even with existing legal regulations, there are still criminal acts, especially TPPU which are carried out through  illegal cryptocurrencies, so it is better for the government to make rules or make legal updates on how to process related to Money Laundering Crimes using cryptocurrencies which include crypto platforms, both legal and illegal.