Purpose: To evaluate the governance of the LaporGub Central Java service portal information system using the COBIT 2019 framework to obtain a comprehensive overview of the implemented capability levels.
Methods: This study employs a qualitative method using the COBIT 2019 framework to assess capability levels, which is further combined with CMMI to provide improvement recommendations. The method produces valid and accurate results as respondents are selected using the RACI model, and the assessment is conducted at the subdomain level. Consequently, each domain yields valid outcomes, enabling precise and well-targeted recommendations.
Results: This study successfully determined the level of LaporGub service capability using COBIT 2019 and showed that most domains have achieved, and in some cases even exceeded, the set targets. However, several areas still require improvement, especially in services security and business process control, as well as problem management. These findings indicate that the Central Java Provincial Communication and Information Office has a strong foundation in operational management and service sustainability. With proper improvements in IT governance, LaporGub is expected to serve as a model for adaptive and accountable digital public services that can be replicated in other regions across Indonesia.
Novelty: This study introduces innovation by integrating COBIT 2019 with CMMI, an uncommon combination in capability level assessments within government institutions. Innovative techniques such as text development, respondent questionnaires based on the RACI model, and interviews are used to avoid redundancy in the research findings. By utilizing questionnaires, interviews, and document reviews, this approach enhances the validity of the study results.

The debate regarding Omnibus Law as the main means for structuring legal regulations in Indonesia attracted a lot of public attention when the Omnibus Law method, which was previously little known in Indonesia as a country that adheres to the Continental European legal system, was used in the preparation of draft laws (RUU). How does the constitutional transition to the establishment of an omnibus law on copyright work in a democratic country? How do we review the constitutionality of the implementation of the Omnibus Law and the copyright mechanism in the formation of statutory regulations? This research uses the concept of normative descriptive research, or what can be called normative juridical research. With this method, law is interpreted as what is written in legislation (law in a book), or law is interpreted as a legal rule, which is a standard for appropriate behavior. The Omnibus Law method practiced in the common law system is interpreted as a (new) law that regulates various kinds of regulations to simplify the various laws that are still in force. Constitutionally, the legal position of the omnibus law concept has not been regulated in the legal system or in the laws and regulations in Indonesia. Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, which was formed using the Omnibus method, is considered to be constitutionally contradictory because it does not have clear objectives and formulation, both in terms of the standard of formation, the systematics of its creation, and the process of changing its substance.