This research is motivated by widespread business networks in the business world and raises fierce business competition. To respond to this, the author conducted a business network research conducted by MSMEs Yoi Milk. The objectives that must be achieved in this study include: (1)  to find out what the founders of Yoi Milk did to build their business network. (2) to find out how marketing is done by Yoi Milk. (3) to find out how the financial management is carried out by Yoi Milk in order to get profits in accordance with what the business wants. This research was conducted directly by the founder of Yoi Milk. This research seeks business networks carried out by Yoi Milk business entrepreneurs to decide on product development starting from marketing carried out to products marketed to consumers. This research uses qualitative methods, one of which is interviewing Yoi Milk business actors about marketing, sales, and financial management carried out for profit.

<p><em>One of the steps needed in patients with fractures of the knee joint is therapeutic exercises guided by physiotherapists. Therapeutic exercise is a physiotherapy modality by moving the joints both actively and passively. Inspired by this, the Portable Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) tool was created which is a physiotherapy aid for patients after surgery or knee surgery. Portable Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) has been developed based on IoT. Portable Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) uses Arduino LoRa as a micro controller, a stepper motor as a driver and uses a software application as a controller. The form of this research is research and development. From the results of the development, it can be concluded that Portable Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) can be useful for postoperative fracture patients as a practical and flexible postoperative manual therapy tool.</em></p>

Secara tradisional suatu perjanjian terjadi berlandaskan asas kebebasam berkontrak di mana dua pihak yang mempunyai kedudukan yang seimbang berusaha untuk mencapai suatu kesepakatan yang diperlukan bagi terjadinya perjanjian itu melalui suatu proses negosiasi diantara mereka. Dewasa ini kecenderungan makin nyata bahwa banyak perjanjian di dalam transaksi bisnis yang terjadi bukan melaui proses negosiasi yang seimbang di antara para pihak, tetapi perjanjian itu terjadi dengan cara pihak yang satu telah menyiapkan syarat-syarat baku pada suatu formulir perjanjian yang sudah dicetak dan kemudian disodorkan kepada pihak lainnya untuk disetujui. Perjanjian yang demikian ini lazim disebut perjanjian baku.Permasalahan yang muncul adalah apakah   perjanjian baku yang dibuat oleh para pebisnis tidak bertentangan dengan asas kebebasan berkontrak, itikad baik, dan kepatutan. Andaikata dalam perjanjian yang dibuat secara baku terdapat ketentuan/pasal   yang merugikan salah satu pihak dapatkah hakim untuk menganulir pasal tersebut dengan mendasarkan pada asas itikad baik dan kepatutan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan telah terjadi pelanggaran terhadap asas kebebasan berkontrak, asas konsensual, dalam merumuskan isi di dalam perjanjian tersebut khususnya pada pasal-pasal yang mengatur hak dan kewajibn para pihak.Terlalu banyak kewajiban yang harus dilakukan oleh pihak francisee tetapi hak yang dimilikinya sangat sedikit. Sebaliknya banyak pasal yang mengatur hak-hak franchisor, akan tetapi sangat sedikit yang mengatur kewajibannya. Hasil penelitan juga menunjukkan hakim dapat menghapuskan pasal-pasal yang diduga sengaja dibuat untuk memberikan keuntungan kepada salah satu pihak atau membebaskan salah satu pihak dari tanggung jawab yang semestinya harus dipikulnya.Traditionally, a contract performs based on the result of prior negotiation between the parties, who have an equal bargaining position. Recently the trend shows many businessmen doing their businesses did not base on equal business negotiation, but one party already set forth standard requirements in an agreement form, then offers to the other party. Commonly the other party only has two options, agree or disagree (take it or leave it) without has an authority for changing the standard requirements. That agreement/contract knows as adhesion agreement or adhesion contract. The research problem which come up; are the standard requirements in standard contract or agreement not in contrary with Freedom of Contract, consensus, Good Faith and Conscionability Principles. The other problem is: is it possible for judge to omit the standard requirements which set intentionally to get much advantages for one party and give disadvantages effect to the other party, based on the Good Faith and Conscionability Principles. The research result which held by normative research approach, shows, the strong party (Franchisor) breached the Freedom of Contract, and consensual principles. He did not arrange the obligations and rights of the parties proportionally. From the franchise agreements we know there were many articles or clauses, which set the franchise obligation, but not many clauses arranged franchise rights. In contrary many clauses set franchisor rights with a less obligations. Based on the literary study judge has rights to omit the clauses which strongly potential to give disadvantages to one party and give advantages to the other party.