This article aims to find out how copyright law protection can be done against song covers using deepfake voice. This research is a prespective normative legal research. The research approach uses statutory and conceptual approaches using primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials uses literature study techniques. The technique of analyzing legal materials uses syllogism with a deductive mindset. Legal protection of copyright on song covers using deepfake voice uploaded on digital platforms can be done by providing protection of economic rights, moral rights, and sanctions. Therefore, to avoid copyright infringement, the perpetrators of song covers using deepfake voices uploaded on digital platforms need to pay attention to moral rights and economic rights regulated in Article 5 and Article 9 of the HC Law. The government is expected to make new regulations regarding the protection and supervision of deepfake voices in relation to the use of songs as well as adding digital platforms Article 3 paragraph (2) of PP No. 56 of 2021 concerning Management of Royalties for Copyright of Songs and/or Music

This research aims to determine the position and role of music aggregators in the digital music industry and the legal liabilities of music aggregators towards the copyright of music creators. This is a normative legal research of a prescriptive nature with a statutory approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials, through literature study, and the technical analysis of legal materials using syllogism with a deductive thinking pattern. Based on the research results and discussions, it can be seen that music aggregators have a position as partial copyright holders of music that has been entrusted to them and play a role as distributors and managers of music royalties that have been entrusted to them. Meanwhile, the legal liabilities of music aggregators as stipulated in the Copyright Law are the recording of licensing agreements, determination of royalties in accordance with prevailing industry practices and fairness, and other liabilities that arise along with licensing agreements.
 
 

This research aims to identify and analyze how social media as a tool for selling graphic design services is then linked to the legal consequences for copyright objects as well as the legal protection given to copyright owners reviewed using Law Number 28 of 2014. This research is a research normative law with a statutory approach. The legal sources used consist of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The legal language analysis technique uses literature study, namely books, journals, articles related to the problem topic. The results of this research show that Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright has basically provided direct legal protection for graphic design creators for the graphic design work they upload to social media. In protecting their creations, graphic design creators can take legal action, both preventive and repressive.