Pancasila, as the foundation of the Indonesian state, plays a crucial role in the formation of law, including customary law. This research focuses on how Pancasila’s values serve as a basis for the recognition and development of customary law, which is still acknowledged within the national legal system. The urgency of this study lies in finding a common ground between national law and customary law to strengthen a just rule of law. The research method used is a normative approach, analyzing legislation and legal literature. The results indicate that Pancasila can function as a foundation for harmonizing customary law and national law, thus reinforcing Indonesia’s plural legal identity. The conclusion is that Pancasila, as the state’s foundational philosophy, provides space for the existence of customary law, as long as it aligns with the core values of Pancasila.
 

This study looks at the legal ramifications of changing the Republic of Indonesia's 1945 Constitution's articles pertaining to citizenship (UUD 1945). The complexity of citizenship issues has increased with globalization, especially when it comes to dual citizenship and the rights of Indonesians residing outside. This study is classified as doctrinal research since it examines legal sources to determine legal principles. The study finds that amendments to the UUD 1945 are necessary to better align Indonesia's citizenship policies with global developments. However, these changes must be carefully considered to protect human rights and maintain national loyalty and identity. Reforming Indonesia's citizenship laws should be done thoughtfully, with input from various stakeholders, to ensure the resulting policies are inclusive and adaptable to the current global context. This research aims to contribute significantly to the development of Indonesia's citizenship policies and to offer a foundation for policymakers in crafting regulations that are more responsive to global challenges.

Customary law reform in Indonesia in the context of globalization raises significant challenges and opportunities. The values of Pancasila, as the ideological foundation of the nation, play an important role in ensuring that customary law reform remains relevant, fair and rooted in local culture. Globalization encourages the modernization and homogenization of the legal system, which often contradicts the principles of customary law based on local wisdom. This article examines how Pancasila values, such as humanity, social justice, unity, and deliberation, can be integrated in the process of customary law reform to remain relevant amid global dynamics. This research uses a qualitative approach with the methods of literature study, interviews, and document analysis. Literature study was conducted to understand the theoretical context of customary law reform and Pancasila values, while interviews were conducted with legal experts, academics, and traditional leaders to obtain empirical perspectives on challenges and opportunities in customary law reform. Document analysis was conducted on policies and regulations relating to customary law and the implementation of Pancasila values in Indonesia. The results show that customary law reform based on Pancasila has great potential to deliver a legal system that is more inclusive and responsive to the needs of local communities. Key challenges identified include difficulties in harmonizing customary law with national and international law and homogenizing pressures from global standards. However, opportunities are also found in the ability of updated customary law to provide more culturally and locally relevant dispute resolution alternatives. The integration of Pancasila values is believed to strengthen the position of customary law within national and global legal frameworks.ract

This think around focuses to essentially and comprehensively see at the concept of citizenship from the focuses of see of sacrosanct law and Islamic law. Citizenship may be a legal status that characterizes the rights and commitments of an individual interior a state. Inside the setting of sacrosanct law, citizenship is controlled through constitutions and citizenship laws that incorporate distinctive perspectives such as the benchmarks of citizenship (ius soli, ius sanguinis), human rights, and conscious commitments. Sacrosanct law besides considers the measures of vote based framework, value, and adjust in choosing citizenship status. On the other hand, from the point of see of Islamic law, the concept of citizenship isn't because it were seen from a legal-formal point but in addition incorporates moral and ethical estimations. Islamic law gives heading on the commitments and rights of individuals as parcel of the ummah (the Muslim community), based on Shariah measures such as value ('adl), open welfare (maslahah), and the confirmation of fundamental human rights. Besides, Islamic law considers the rights of non-Muslims interior an Islamic state setting through the concept of "ahl al-dhimmah" (guaranteed people) and the benchmarks of minority rights security. This examine grasps a essential and comparative examination approach to evaluate the resemblances and contrasts between these two perspectives. The revelations illustrate that in show disdain toward of foremost contrasts in their philosophical and methodological bases, both secured law and Islamic law share common goals, to be particular the confirmation of human rights and social value. In any case, contrasts inside the interpretation of these concepts can impact the execution of citizenship approaches in several countries. The think approximately additionally highlights the challenges and openings in coordination Islamic law benchmarks into the framework of display day sacrosanct law, particularly in Muslim-majority countries. At final, the examine proposes the require for more genuinely interest talk to realize a concordant agreeable vitality between secured law and Islamic law in controlling citizenship sensibly and comprehensively.