Publication Search

A death certificate is proof of a person's death, but in its implementation there are still several problems, including that there are still people who have died but are included in the permanent voter list for the 2024 election and there are falsification of death certificates. The aim of this research is to find out and analyze the effectiveness of the death certificate recording program in the population and civil registration services of South Tangerang City. The method used in this research is a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. The results of the research show that target accuracy is said to be optimal, because people already know and receive death certificate registration services. The program socialization indicators are not yet optimal, because there are still people in the South Tangerang City area who do not know how important it is to take care of population administration, especially death certificates, due to the lack of socialization by the population and civil registration services. In terms of indicators of achieving program objectives, there are still people who have not registered death certificates even though they are aware of the existence of the death certificate registration program. In terms of monitoring indicators, the program has not gone well in its implementation because it was found that people had not registered death certificates, this is because the supervision carried out by the population and civil registration services did not reach enough and was not evenly distributed to all communities in South Tangerang City.

Customs is everything related to the supervision of the traffic of goods entering or leaving the customs area as well as the collection of import and export duties. Based on this definition of customs, the Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DJBC) has a very strategic role in both supervision and service. Economic life between one country and another is increasingly interdependent so that legal provisions in the field of international trade and transnational business are increasingly necessary. As time goes by, the presence of corporations in the economy is like a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it can provide benefits for economic growth through state income in the form of taxes thereby increasing the country's foreign exchange and on the other hand, it can threaten state income because corporations often commit crimes to gain as much profit as possible by falsifying goods export documents. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 1 paragraph 3 states that Indonesia is a legal state. In accordance with the concept of a rule of law, everything related to processes carrying out aspects of government power is based on law, including the law enforcement process in cases in the customs sector, especially in the export sector. This research uses normative legal research methods. Normative research is research carried out by examining library materials using data sourced from secondary data, namely primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Data collection in this research was carried out by document study and literature study. Then it is described qualitatively to make it easier to draw conclusions from the data. The aim of this research is to determine the factors that cause corporations to commit criminal acts of falsifying export documents and to find out what corporate criminal liability is for criminal acts of falsifying export documents according to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2006 concerning Customs.    

The act of falsifying documents in general elections is a serious violation of the basic principles of democracy and legal regulations governing the democratic process. In politics, document falsification not only impacts specific individuals or groups, but also substantially undermines the integrity and legitimacy of the democratic process as a whole. From a legal justice perspective, such actions violate the basic principles that should govern the integrity of elections, threatening the foundations of democracy itself. By using fake documents, individuals or groups can manipulate election results in unfair ways, leading to a reduction in public trust in democratic institutions. Moreover, such actions create doubts about the legitimacy and fairness of the election process, which is the main foundation of an effective democratic system. In the case mentioned, Dr. Sihabuddin Chalid, M.M., Pd. bin (late) Khalid Noor, deliberately created fake documents to become a candidate for DPRD members, which directly violated Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. Therefore, strict law enforcement is very important to prevent abuse of political power and maintain public trust in government institutions.

The existence of the Council's Honorary Court as a supporting tool is contained in Article 119 of Law Number 17 of 2014 concerning MD3 in conjunction with Law Number 2 of 2018 concerning MD3 in conjunction with Law Number. 13 of 2019 concerning MD3. That the Council's Honorary Court was established by the DPR with the aim of maintaining and upholding the honor and dignity of the DPR as a representative institution of the people. That the implementation of the Election which is carried out directly is a manifestation of the implementation of democracy which is a manifestation of the sovereignty of the people. In the election, violations of the law were found as regulated in Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning Elections. That election crimes are a form of violation of the law related to acts of falsification of documents, money politics and there is also intimidation of voters and others. That these actions are alleged violations of election crimes because they are contrary to laws and regulations. That to ensure the existence of an election crime, it must go through a court process with a judge's decision, which must first be processed by the Gakkumdu Center, which is an element of Bawaslu, the National Police, and the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. That if proven to have committed an election crime as stated in the district court decision, the legislative candidate has committed an ethical violation, although this must be processed legally in accordance with the mechanism regulated in the DPR Council's Ethics Court, namely referring to the MD3 Law, Regulation of the People's Representative Council Number. 1 of 2015 concerning the Code of Ethics of the People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia and Regulation of the People's Representative Council Number. 2 of 2014 concerning the Procedures of the Council's Ethics Court.