Publication Search

This study analyzes the differences between the neoliberal and social democratic paradigms in poverty alleviation policies in Indonesia, by adding an Islamic Economic perspective as an alternative. The neoliberal paradigm focuses on free market mechanisms, deregulation, and minimizing the role of the state, but often exacerbates social inequality. In contrast, the social democratic paradigm balances the role of the market and state intervention through resource redistribution and protection of vulnerable groups through sustainable social programs. Islamic economics offers a complementary approach oriented towards the principles of distributive justice, balance, and solidarity, by integrating spiritual values ​​into socio-economic policies. A qualitative approach is used in this study, with policy analysis of programs such as the Family Hope Program (PKH) and the National Health Insurance (JKN). The results show that the social democratic paradigm is more effective in reducing poverty systemically than neoliberalism, especially through increasing access to education, health, and social protection. However, budget constraints, corruption, and infrastructure gaps remain significant challenges. The Islamic Economic perspective emphasizes the importance of zakat, waqf, and infaq as instruments of wealth redistribution that have the potential to strengthen inclusive and sustainable poverty alleviation policies. This study recommends strengthening the synergy between the paradigm of social democracy and the values ​​of Islamic Economics to create policies that are more effective, equitable, and oriented towards the welfare of society holistically.  

The recovery of state/regional assets is one of the important strategies in preventing corruption in Indonesia. The AGO, as a law enforcement agency, has a central role in restoring state assets suspected of being the proceeds of corruption. However, in practice, the AGO faces various obstacles that affect the effectiveness of asset recovery. Legal constraints such as overlapping regulations, complicated procedures, and asset ownership, are core difficulties. In addition, limited human resources and technology, as well as socio-political factors involving corruption in government institutions, also worsen the asset recovery process. This research focuses on identifying and analyzing the obstacles faced by the AGO in recovering state and regional assets. It also aims to outline the necessary steps to enhance the AGO's effectiveness in preventing corruption.  

The goal of this study is to maximize the Corruption Eradication Commission's (KPK) ability to stop corrupt activities. Within the executive power group, the Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK) is a state institution that exercises its authority and functions independently, unaffected by other powers. This study employs a qualitative approach and descriptive research methods. The study's findings indicate that while the Corruption Eradication Commission's (KPK) performance has improved, it is still not at its best. Corruption can result in large financial losses and erode public confidence in the government.

This research aims to explore and reconstruct the legal protection policy for justice collaborators in corruption crimes in Indonesia. Although their existence is vital in combating corruption, many perpetrators are reluctant to come forward due to uncertainty in protection and the potential risks they face. Weaknesses in the existing policies, including a lack of transparency and adequate security guarantees, hinder perpetrators from collaborating with law enforcement. Therefore, this research identifies various challenges faced by justice collaborators and highlights the importance of comprehensive legal protection reform. This study offers recommendations for appropriate and effective legal protection efforts for justice collaborators in handling corruption cases. By analyzing protection practices in other countries and applying restorative justice principles, this research aims to provide solutions that not only protect justice collaborators but also enhance public trust in the justice system. It is hoped that the results of this research can contribute to formulating more effective and responsive policies to meet the protection needs of justice collaborators in Indonesia, encouraging more perpetrators to bravely come forward in the fight against corruption.

Corruption is one of the biggest problems that hinders Indonesia's progress, even though this country uses Pancasila as the basis of the state. Pancasila should be a moral guideline in every aspect of national and state life, including in preventing corruption. This study aims to analyze the causes of corruption in Indonesia in various professions, as well as to examine the relationship between the application of Pancasila values and corrupt practices in this country. The study uses a library method by analyzing 47 articles and journals from 2020-2024. The research findings show that the main causes of corruption in Indonesia include weak law enforcement, a deep-rooted culture of corruption, inability to manage power, and socio-economic disparities.  

The rampant corruption that continues to be demonstrated by public officials makes it seem as if the law has run out of ways to overcome it. And corruption is a type of crime that is only committed by people who have high intellectual capacity and ability. They continue to try how to avoid corruption crimes, so one of the methods they use is the pattern of giving gifts which is actually intended as a form of bribery. This study analyzes the concept of bribery and gratification and the parameters that differentiate between the two as regulated in several Articles of the Corruption Eradication Law. This involves the application of normative legal research supported by court decisions to clarify the differences. The results of this study indicate that bribery requires a meeting of minds between the bribe giver and the bribe recipient which is not found in the decision . The reporting mechanism and reversal of the burden of proof do not apply to bribery while the sting operation does not apply to gratification because it cannot meet the provisions of Article 1 number 19 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Criminal sanctions are also imposed on both the giver and the recipient of the bribe, while the act of the giver of gratification is not a criminal act. Keywords: reversal of burden of proof, caught red-handed, reporting mechanism .

The aim of this service is to strengthen understanding of anti-corruption values ​​and prevent unethical and corrupt behavior among students, especially in the school environment. The service method used in this activity is in the form of socialization which includes distributing posters, providing material followed by a question and answer session. , with special emphasis on instilling anti-corruption values ​​in today's young generation from an early age. When compared between pre-test and post-test activities, there is a very large difference in percentages before and after receiving the material. In the pre-test, 20 students answered 30% from 10 questions correctly and 70% incorrectly. In contrast, in the post-test, the same students answered 95% of the 10 questions correctly and 5% incorrectly. It can be concluded that through socialization, providing educational materials and discussions, participants were able to understand the teaching of values. anti-corruption values ​​from an early age. The findings of this service highlight the importance of instilling anti-corruption values ​​in students from an early age in everyday life.

E The integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles into e-procurement systems offers a pathway to achieving sustainable public procurement in Indonesia. This study explores relevant ESG criteria and formulates strategies to enhance the capacity of procurement personnel in implementing these principles. The findings highlight the importance of incorporating environmental criteria such as energy efficiency, eco-friendly materials, and waste management; social criteria like labor standards compliance, local MSME empowerment, and gender equality; and governance criteria including transparency, anti-corruption, and tax compliance. While e-procurement provides a digital platform to improve efficiency and transparency, challenges such as limited awareness, capacity gaps, and the absence of specific ESG guidelines hinder effective implementation. To address these issues, the study proposes strategic measures, including the development of ESG-based evaluation systems, comprehensive training programs for procurement personnel, and robust monitoring frameworks. These initiatives aim to align procurement practices with the principles of Sustainable Public Procurement (SPP), ensuring that procurement contributes to environmental sustainability, social equity, and better governance. By overcoming existing barriers and fostering collaboration among stakeholders, Indonesia can position itself as a leader in sustainable procurement practices. This research provides practical recommendations to integrate ESG into procurement systems, paving the way for a more accountable, equitable, and sustainable procurement framework.

Corruption is an unlawful act to enrich or obtain one-sided benefits, corruption has rules that have specific characteristics, both regarding formal (procedural) and material (substance) criminal law, law enforcement of corruption in Indonesia depends on the Criminal Justice System itself, from investigation then prosecution, and examination in court and the implementation of the punishment. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the pattern of law enforcement against corruption in the perspective of criminal law in Indonesia, and how efforts and criticism of the eradication of corruption in Indonesia. This research method is descriptive and normative juridical approach, with legal materials as secondary data. relating to law enforcement against criminal acts of corruption in the Indonesian criminal justice system. the criminal justice system in Indonesia is not yet competent in handling criminal acts of corruption because instead of subsidizing, corruption cases in Indonesia are increasing. this is because the four criminal justice systems in Indonesia lack coordination and supervision, and the sanctions given are still considered not optimal so that they have not caused a deterrent effect on the perpetrators and the effect of public satisfaction.

The Draft Asset Forfeiture Law represents a significant step in combating economic crimes in Indonesia, focusing on non-conviction-based asset recovery. This study aims to analyze the perceptions of Chemical Engineering students (2023 Cohort, Parallel C) at UPN "Veteran" East Java, a designated State Defense Campus, regarding the law's effectiveness. Employing a quantitative approach, data were gathered using a validated Likert-scale questionnaire assessing understanding, potential impacts, and alignment with state defense principles. The findings reveal that the majority of students perceive the draft law as a strategic tool for strengthening justice, reducing corruption, safeguarding public interests, and enhancing governmental integrity. However, some respondents expressed concerns over potential conflicts with human rights and implementation inefficiencies. This research underscores the necessity of harmonizing legislative frameworks with human rights and public trust, emphasizing the role of state defense education in fostering policy support..

The recovery of state/regional assets is one of the important strategies in preventing corruption in Indonesia. The AGO, as a law enforcement agency, has a central role in restoring state assets suspected of being the proceeds of corruption. However, in practice, the AGO faces various obstacles that affect the effectiveness of asset recovery. Legal constraints such as overlapping regulations, complicated procedures, and asset ownership, are core difficulties. In addition, limited human resources and technology, as well as socio-political factors involving corruption in government institutions, also worsen the asset recovery process. This research focuses on identifying and analyzing the obstacles faced by the AGO in recovering state and regional assets. It also aims to outline the necessary steps to enhance the AGO's effectiveness in preventing corruption.

This study examines the role of social media in monitoring and preventing corruption in Indonesia, an issue that has become a primary concern among the public and government. With the increasing number of social media users in the country, these platforms are expected to serve as effective tools in enhancing public participation in overseeing corrupt practices. The research explores various aspects, including how social media enables the community to report corruption cases, share information, and build collective awareness about the impact of corruption. Additionally, this study highlights the challenges faced in utilizing social media, such as unequal access, negative responses from authorities, and the phenomenon of information fragmentation that can hinder constructive dialogue among the public. Through a literature review approach, this research analyzes various relevant sources to provide in-depth insights into the impact and effectiveness of social media in preventing corruption. The findings of this study are expected to offer recommendations for maximizing the potential of social media as a tool to support transparency and public accountability in Indonesia. With a better understanding of the role of social media, it is hoped that both the public and government can collaborate more effectively in the fight against corruption, thereby creating a cleaner and more accountable environment for future generations.    

The condition of corruption in Indonesia seems to require serious efforts starting from schools. Basic education, especially anti-corruption education, must be strengthened in schools. Students of MTS Al-Muttaqin must be educated about anti-corruption literacy through this community service. Three stages of the implementation plan were carried out. The preparation stage includes licensing, coordination, and socialization at MTS Al-Muttaqin. The second stage is implementation, which includes socialization and counseling. The third stage is evaluation and preparation of the MTS Al-Muttaqin report. The results of the community service show that students are able to prevent corruption by studying anti-corruption.

The condition of corruption in Indonesia seems to require serious efforts starting from schools. Basic education, especially anti-corruption education, must be strengthened in schools. Students of MTS Al-Muttaqin must be educated about anti-corruption literacy through this community service. Three stages of the implementation plan were carried out. The preparation stage includes licensing, coordination, and socialization at MTS Al-Muttaqin. The second stage is implementation, which includes socialization and counseling. The third stage is evaluation and preparation of the MTS Al-Muttaqin report. The results of the community service show that students are able to prevent corruption by studying anti-corruption.

Corruption remains a significant concern in Indonesia, exemplified by the case of former Supreme Court Judge Zarof Ricar, suspected of acting as a case broker. This case began with the arrest of three Surabaya district court judges on October 20, 2024, for allegedly accepting bribes to free Ronald Tannur. Misconceptions that winning court cases requires significant costs have created opportunities for fraud, with individuals claiming they can guarantee favorable outcomes. The Zarof Ricar case highlights the declining integrity of government institutions and the lack of synergy among law enforcement, contributing to the prevalence of corruption. This situation underscores the urgent need for comprehensive legal reform. Strengthened regulations, stricter internal supervision, and harsh penalties for corrupt practices are essential to restoring public trust in the legal system and improving institutional integrity. This study aims to provide insights by employing juridical-normative and empirical methods, utilizing literature, legal documents, observations, and interviews.

This abstract discusses the importance of preventing corruption through effective implementation of the law, especially in relation to stakeholders. Corruption is a serious threat to public trust and the stability of government and private institutions. Strict and fair application of the law is very necessary to create a transparent and accountable environment. By implementing clear rules and heavy sanctions, acts of corruption can be minimized. Active participation of stakeholders, including government, civil society and the private sector, is also very necessary in monitoring and supporting efforts to prevent corruption. This will create good governance and strengthen public trust in institutions.

The corruption case in Indonesia, specifically the BTS project scandal by the Ministry of Communication and Informatics, reflects serious challenges in public financial management. According to information from Transparency International, Indonesia still ranks as a country with a high level of corruption. The BTS project, aimed at improving internet access in remote areas, has been revealed to suffer from budget misuse and corrupt practices by high ranking officials. To address this issue, forensic audits and digital evidence have become crucial tools in uncovering crimes. However, challenges such as a lack of trained human resources, limited technological infrastructure, and inter-agency coordination hinder the effectiveness of law enforcement. Integrated efforts to enhance the capacity of law enforcement and technological infrastructure are needed to effectively combat corruption and create a clean and transparent government.

With this service, students of SMP 4 Muhammadiyah Pekanbaru are educated about anti- corruption literacy. Corruption is an act carried out to gain profit in a bad way, such as bribing, extortion, gratification, and others. The implementation plan is carried out in three stages. In the preparation stage, SMP 4 Muhammadiyah Pekanbaru carries out licensing, coordination, and socialization. The second stage is implementation, which includes socialization and counseling. The third stage is evaluation and preparation of reports. The results of the service show that students of SMP 4 Muhammadiyah Pekanbaru have the ability to avoid corruption after learning about anti-corruption.

Corruption has become a serious problem that hinders the development of various sectors, including traffic law enforcement. Corrupt practices in this sector not only harm the state, but also threaten the safety and comfort of society. Achieving transparency and accountability in traffic law enforcement is very important. This strategy must not only involve changes to regulations, but also requires increasing the capacity and integrity of law enforcement officials, as well as active involvement of the community in supervision. Preventing corruption in traffic law enforcement requires implementing these solutions in an integrated manner, so that it is hoped that traffic law enforcement in Indonesia can become more transparent, accountable and free from corruption. These efforts will not only improve the quality of law enforcement, but also increase public trust in law enforcement institutions, which will ultimately contribute to public safety and welfare.    

Corruption is one of the criminal acts that most damages the social, economic and political order of a country. Corruption has become a crucial problem that hampers national development, affects public trust in government institutions, and reduces the quality of public services. In this context, legal analysis regarding criminal acts of corruption is very important to understand the challenges faced in law enforcement as well as preventive measures that can be implemented. Although there have been various efforts by the government and law enforcement agencies to eradicate corruption, the challenges that arise are often complex and multidimensional. With a holistic approach, various strategic solutions can be explored, including legal reform, strengthening supervisory systems, public education, economic empowerment, and the application of modern technology such as blockchain. Apart from that, the importance of collaboration between government, society, anti-corruption institutions and the private sector is also emphasized to create a transparent and accountable environment. In conclusion, eradicating corruption requires a joint commitment from all elements of society to achieve sustainable and equitable development goals.