Publication Search

This research aims to determine the factors that cause corruption using the fraud triangle theory in literary media. The literary work that will be used as a source of research data is the novel entitled "86" by Okky Madasari. The problem that will be presented is about what factors influence the occurrence of corruption using the fraud triangle theory in the novel "86". This research is a type of qualitative research using the hermeneutic method or interpreting the meaning of the text. The conclusions obtained from this research are the results of the analysis carried out on the novel "86" by Okky Madasari, which shows the factors that cause acts of corruption, namely pressure, opportunity and justification.

With globalization, modernization and digitalization, of course this has a big influence on everything. Apart from the many good influences, there are also quite a few bad influences that are very clear, such as rampant corruption, murders occurring everywhere, brawls between regions, burning of places of worship, weak laws, sexual harassment, robbery, and others. In this research, the author used a research method using the literature study method. The data taken comes from literature sourced from scientific journals in the form of articles, theses, theses, books and from other sources. There are several original characters of the Indonesian nation, including religious, love of the country, mutual cooperation, tolerance, friendliness and creativity. However, with globalization and modernization, this character is slowly fading until efforts are needed to reshape the character of the Indonesian nation.

The aim of this research is to find out criminal responsibility for political parties based on the perspective of responsibility theory and to find out the ideal sanctions for political parties that obtain funds from corruption. The research method used in this research is literature or normative, namely "the process of searching for a legal regulation , legal principles, and legal doctrine in order to answer the legal problems faced. The results and discussion of this research are: 1) Political parties that obtain funds from corruption crimes can be charged with legal responsibility, this is because political parties which are legal entities are included in the definition of corporations as intended in Law Number 8 of 2010 and Law Number 31 of 1999. Apart from that, the actions of political parties who receive funds from corruption crimes are also criminal acts of money laundering as stipulated in Law Number 8 of 2010. 2) The ideal sanction for political parties involved in or obtaining funds from corruption crimes is to reduce political party financial assistance sourced from the APBN/APBD by the amount 30%, this sanction is applied to political parties whose members commit criminal acts of corruption independently or singly and do not involve political parties and sanctions for the dissolution of political parties if they commit criminal acts of corruption collectively and/or political parties that receive funds from criminal acts of corruption.

State assets in BUMN are State Finance, namely state money which is separated into its management as a form of direct capital participation from the state. BUMN is a business entity so it is a business entity whose business orientation is focused on making a profit (profit). The problem is that not all BUMNs in Indonesia are said to be good and healthy BUMNs, because a number of BUMNs are still suffering significant or even very large losses. Quite a few of the BUMNs in question suffer losses due to various factors, so that if losses occur to the BUMN, then these losses constitute losses to the State Finances and qualify as a criminal act of corruption. From the research results, it can be concluded that state finances in state-owned companies are realized in the criteria if all the capital comes from separated state assets, and if the majority (majority) of the capital comes from separated state assets. These two criteria indicate the existence of state assets in state-owned companies so that they are fully subject to the legal provisions of state-owned companies according to Law no. 19 of 2003. State financial losses to state-owned companies are not state financial losses, but rather losses to the state-owned companies themselves. Thus, these financial losses are subject to the provisions of private law as regulated in Law no. 19 of 2003 and Law no. 40 of 2007 concerning PT

In business activities in the form of a Company, there are often legal problems involving directors as a result of the decisions and policies they make in carrying out their duties and authority in the company. The Board of Directors is one of the most important organs in a Limited Liability Company whose duty is to run the company as stated in Law Number 40 of 2007 (UU PT) concerning Limited Liability Companies. In the event of a loss caused by the decision or policy, the board of directors can be sued personally either criminally or civilly. This research aims to analyze the case of former President Director of PT Krakatau Steel (KS) Fazwar Bujang in making decisions on the construction of the Blast Furnace Complex plant in 2011 which is considered to have harmed the state of Rp 2.3 trillion and USD 292 or up to Rp 6 trillion and has benefited the MCC Ceri consortium, a company from China and PT Krakatau Engineering and others. The first result shows that the business judgment rule doctrine is a concept in corporate law that provides protection to company directors regarding the decisions and policies they make, to ensure that directors can make decisions based on good faith, prudence, and the best interests of the company without having to be personally liable for losses that may arise from business decisions. In Indonesia, the business judgment rule doctrine is only regulated in UU PT, but it has not been regulated in the law completely. Second, in the case of the construction of PT Krakatau Steel's Blast Furnace Complex, the business judgment rule cannot be applied because the business policies taken do not meet the requirements of the business judgment rule stipulated in Article 97 paragraph (3) of the UU PT.

Study of students at Trunojoyo University, Madura, to analyze how they use art as a tool to convey social criticism in a contemporary context. This research uses a qualitative approach with in-depth interviews, observations, and content analysis of students' artistic works such as fine art, theater, music, and literature. The results of the analysis show that students at Trunojoyo University, Madura, use art as a powerful form of social criticism, depicting various issues such as gender inequality, corruption, social injustice and environmental issues. Art among students is used as a means to increase social awareness, stimulate thinking and stimulate social change. In the current context, students utilize technological innovation and social media to expand the impact of social criticism, creating works of art that stimulate discussion and reflection in society and society in general. This study not only provides insight into how students at Trunojoyo University, Madura, use art as a tool for social criticism, but also illustrates how art can be a force for transformative change in facing the social challenges faced by contemporary society.

settlement of bad debts made by debtors, is a violation of the program credit distribution program against sulut-go bank which has generated a lot of speculation about the rules of civil law. The problem is the enforcement of the law against the debtor allegedly with the issue of the article on the crime of corruption article 2 paragraph 1. The purpose of this research is to find out thoroughly about the enforcement of bad credit in the review of civil law. bad credit in the review of civil law and judge's decision, the problem of bad credit, and default. and default. Bank Sulut-Go which is in limboto branch against debtors who have bad credit.  and discussion of the research that there is an imprudence that is done by the bank regarding the credit process by pledging something that does not belong to the debtor, but is processed.belonging to the debtor, but processed. Furthermore, that this contract occurs contract with a repayment duration that is not yet due but has already entered the court. The conclusion drawn by the researcher is that when a case that still has a contract it includes default and is a problem of bonding between people because it arises due to the cideranya promise, whose resolution path must be the civil realm. Default in bad credit can be recognized when there is an error, negligence, and willfulness.

It cannot be denied that corruption is a special crime that threatens the survival of the state and nation, hinders development, and causes high economic costs and other negative impacts. This article's research method uses a qualitative analysis method, descriptive analysis combined with library research methods, to analyze laws and regulations related to the main problem. The discussion focuses on the scope of policies and regulations relevant to the business world and best practices for prevention efforts that can be carried out by the business world. Regulations prohibiting corporate criminal acts are clearly regulated, and business entities that commit corporate criminal acts can be held criminally responsible. Companies can implement anti-corruption programs in various ways. To increase the effectiveness of efforts to prevent corporate corruption, corporate anti-corruption programs need to be risk-based, communicative, dynamic, and continuously evaluated through measuring the success of appropriate internal steps and collaborative activities.

This research aims to determine the impact of lack of transparency in regional financial management on local development and community welfare and accountability will remain a topic of concern in society. The public does not want acts of corruption to occur in government, because acts of corruption will not only be detrimental to state finances, they will also have an impact on hampering state development and reducing the level of social welfare. This type of research is a literature study. Library study activities related to methods of collecting library data, reading and taking notes and processing research materials. The results of the research inform that the phenomenon of non-transparency in the areas of budgeting, personnel, procurement of goods and services is certainly a fact that must be revealed based on the facts that can be observed and witnessed in various implementation of the main duties and functions of government employees. The cause of non-transparency in the various fields mentioned above is because there are factors that hinder the realization of transparency in the implementation of clean, authoritative and responsible regional government. Keywords: Transparency, Finance, Society

Decision Number 2205 K/Pd/Sus/2022 The Supreme Court again upheld the acquittal decision of Samin Tan as the owner of PT Beneficial Ownershiprneo Lumbung Energi & Metal (PT BLEM). The panel is of the opinion that the giver of gratification cannot be punished because the Corruption Eradication Law is not designed to punish the giver of gratification even though Samin Tan's position as the giver of gratification is the ultimate beneficiary owner of PT BLEM. The research method used in this research is using normative juridical research methods and using literature study techniques to answer the problems in this research. The result of the discussion of the first problem formulation is that Samin Tan cannot be held criminally responsible because the person giving the gratification is not criminalized under the law even though Samin Tan is the ultimate beneficiary owner who has the potential to commit this act because it is in the interests of his company. The result of the discussion on the formulation of the second problem is that the judge's considerations in the decision did not prioritize a sense of justice and expediency because they only prioritized legal certainty which resulted in Samin Tan being able to escape the demands of the public prosecutor.

The role of judges in forming laws and interpreting statutory texts is important to realize the value of legal certainty. Evidence in criminal justice is an important focus. Especially if there are judges who have different views and apply dissenting opinions in assessing concrete cases, especially criminal acts of corruption. The aim of this research is to analyze the views of two different panels of judges in achieving legal certainty and substantive justice received by the defendant during the criminal justice process. The research method used in this research is normative-empirical research which in collecting data uses literature and observation methods to observe and record the situation and conditions of legal events that occur. The results of this research are that judges' freedom in making decisions often ignores legal certainty due to differences in interpretation, resulting in clear laws becoming unclear and the value of legal certainty not being achieved optimally

Corruption has become a global concern in efforts to strengthen good governance. In the context of Islamic law, aspects of preventing corruption and implementing the principle of legality in criminal acts attract in-depth attention. This article analyzes corruption prevention strategies from the perspective of Islamic law in the context of applying the principle of legality to criminal acts. The method in this research is a qualitative method in exploring Islamic legal concepts related to preventing corruption, such as Taqwa, Adl, and Amanah,as well as how these values ​​can be applied in efforts to prevent and overcome corruption. Furthermore, this article also examines legal aspects related to the implementation of the principle of legality in enforcing the law against criminal acts of corruption according to Islamic teachings. The results of the analysis show that the principles of Islamic law provide a strong foundation for corruption prevention strategies. Concepts such as justice, transparency, fair punishment, and building strong institutions are the main focus in overcoming the problem of corruption. In the context of implementing the principle of legality, consistency with sharia principles in establishing and enforcing laws is crucial to ensure the success of efforts to prevent corruption. This article contributes to a better understanding of corruption prevention strategies from an Islamic legal perspective, as well as the importance of integrating Islamic legal values ​​and principles in efforts to eradicate corruption. The practical implications of this analysis support the need for a holistic approach that includes legal and moral aspects in tackling corruption to create a society that is more just and has integrity.

Education has the function of instilling, developing, and implementing rational values, regularity, diligence, and productive attitudes which in turn are able to bring about humans who have noble character, are devoted to God Almighty, and have human values. Pancasila and Citizenship Education or what is more often called PPKn is one of the subjects that must be given to students in order to form good citizens, loyal to Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The aim of this activity is to increase the competency of PPKn teachers in the field of Anti-Corruption Education, eradicating corruption through more effective and systematic educational strategies through students and teachers in anti-corruption outreach efforts. The implementation method is training which aims to increase understanding of the dangers of criminal acts of corruption and strengthen commitment as an extension of the eradication of corruption, followed by training in the form of mentoring prospective Anti-Corruption Counselors. It is hoped that the results of this activity will be that participants will later become anti-corruption educators, which requires a strong will and determination to lead the anti-corruption movement, namely perfection in conveying basic anti-corruption information and integrity. willing to have anti-corruption teacher qualifications

Corruption crimes that occur in Indonesia are increasingly developing in various sectors and are not only carried out by individuals but by corporations. However, the fact is that law enforcement still rarely touches cases of crimes committed by corporations, let alone holding these corporations accountable. The problems raised in this paper are: 1) What is the criminal responsibility of corporations as perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption in the case of the Nanti Agung road improvement project, Seluma Regency. 2) What were the judge's legal considerations in sentencing 8 suspects, including the former Head of the Seluma DPU Department? The approach method used in this research is literature study. Based on the research, the following results were obtained: 1) Corporate criminal liability as perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption in the case of the Nanti Agung road improvement project, Seluma Regency is the imposition of criminal liability on 8 suspects including the former Head of the Seluma DPU Department. 2) The basis of the judge's legal considerations in sentencing to 8 suspects, including the former Head of the Seluma DPU, was that the elements of the Corruption Crime were fulfilled, juridical considerations, as well as aggravating and mitigating factors. The author believes that the appropriate model of criminal liability is the imposition of criminal liability on corporations and corporate managers, so that there is a deterrent effect for corporations.

The purpose of this research is to analyze the efforts of prosecutors as executors in recovering state financial losses resulting from corruption crimes. This research is an empirical legal research conducted at the Kupang City State Attorney's Office. The data collection technique uses observation, interview, and literature/document study techniques. The data used are primary and secondary data. This research was conducted in Kupang City. The results of data processing were analyzed descriptively qualitatively using the inductive method. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be seen: (1) The efforts of the prosecutor as the executor at the Kupang City District Attorney's Office in recovering state financial losses due to corruption are four, namely, tracking, blocking, confiscation, seizure. (2) obstacles faced by prosecutors as executors in recovering state financial losses.

Corruption is an unethical act, such as embezzlement, accepting bribes, and similar actions. The practice of corruption has permeated all levels of government, including the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, both at the central and local levels. As democracy has developed in Indonesia, the quantity and quality of corrupt activities have also increased. On the other hand, Administrative Law can be described as a guide for government actions, the implementation of activities, the management of public policies, decision analysis, and the tasks of individuals and groups in providing public services and goods. Additionally, Administrative Law is also an academic and theoretical field related to state governance. This research aims to investigate how Administrative Law can play a role in preventing corrupt practices. The results of this study indicate that Administrative Law plays a crucial role in establishing transparent and corruption-free governance. The role of Administrative Law in preventing corruption involves optimizing leadership, improving policy implementation, enhancing the integrity and ethics of the bureaucracy, and increasing public understanding of laws related to corruption.

Organizations are made up of people who react differently to the impact of corruption. Organizational integrity includes the integration of systems, operational organization, strategy, control, corruption, and ethical standards, thereby creating norms of behavior. Another misconception is that corruption originates from organizations, not the individuals within them, as if ethical violations in practice occur almost by osmosis from organizations that are not accountable to those individuals. Individual efforts to eradicate corruption are likely to be less successful than efforts made by organizations. The transfer of money from individuals into organizational dynamics can be seen in the case of criminal corporations. Disruption if the organization provides a structural framework that eliminates the possibility of practical corruption. The ability of individuals to interpret rules or decide whether to implement certain protocols should be avoided in systems that cannot be manipulated.

Corruption in Indonesia is a chronic problem that damages the social and economic structure of the country. This paper explores the history of corruption from feudal times to the modern era, highlighting corrupt practices as part of the culture of government. The government has taken serious steps by establishing anti-corruption regulations and institutions to eradicate corruption that harms society and the state. This research uses the literature study method with a focus on improving governance and increasing transparency as an effort to prevent corruption. Through qualitative analysis, this research evaluates the effectiveness of existing anti-corruption regulations and institutions, as well as understanding the impact of corruption on people's social and economic rights. The results show that the government has taken concrete steps, such as establishing the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and encouraging the use of information technology. However, the fight against corruption is faced with structural, cultural, instrumental and management barriers. Measures to improve governance and increase transparency are key to preventing corruption. Challenges include organized corruption, corrupt practices in the private sector, and non-compliance with regulations. Lack of resources is a constraint, and corruption in complex bureaucratic systems complicates case handling. Improving coordination, transparency, and public participation is needed to overcome these challenges. The government needs to continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of corruption-fighting measures. Regular evaluation, public participation, and human resource capacity building are key to creating a strong and resilient system against corrupt practices. Collective awareness and cooperation between the government, anti-corruption organizations, and society are essential to build an Indonesia that is clean from corruption and just for all its people.  

Corruption can be defined as bad habitual behavior and is a common phenomenon in society. This concern arises because the perpetrators of corruption exist in both government and private organizations and may also involve leaders of organizations who are role models for the younger generation. One of the efforts to reduce the increase in corruption cases is to focus on the legal aspect. However, there have not been many preventive efforts through education that have the potential to eradicate the "culture of corruption". Anti-corruption education is a preventive effort to increase self-awareness and integrity in the face of corrupt practices. The purpose of this study is to determine whether anti-corruption education can develop students' sensitivity and awareness of corruption issues. The research method is to combine collective self-reflective action research with student-centered learning, conducted in small groups, and realized through critical reflective actions of group members as individuals, and measure the learning outcomes. The participants in this study amounted to 25 students in one class. The results obtained show that students are able to identify corrupt practices based on individual and collective experiences. Documented student corruption includes cheating, tardiness and fraud. Participants were also able to identify the impact of corrupt practices on individuals and (groups). Participants realized that corruption can create a "domino effect" of corrupt behavior over time. At the reflection stage, participants revealed the existence of integrity values in the form of honesty, responsibility, consistency of attitudes and behavior, and religious values that are believed to prevent corrupt practices. Activities carried out in the form of socialization as a form of change in the management of student organizations that are clean and anti-corruption.

The anti-corruption attitude of legislative candidates in the context of overcoming corruption in Indonesia is an interesting thing to observe and study, Indonesia has stipulated MPR RI Decree Number XI / MPR / 1998 concerning the administration of a State that is Clean and Free of Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism, it turns out that the provisions that have been determined do not become a reference for legislative members so that corruption cases are still rampant within the legislative body. Normative legal research or library research, with a statute approach, conceptual approach, comparative approach, historical approach. The nature of the research used in this research is descriptive-prescriptive, the author uses content analysis. The results of this study are anti-corruption attitudes for legislative candidates with the MPR decree, the Election Law should pay more attention to former corruption convicts who can run as legislative candidates, apart from contradicting the MPR decree, the decision in the Election Law can eliminate public trust in state administrators.