Publication Search

Employment agreements are essential legal instruments that regulate the rights and obligations of workers and employers in industrial relations, aiming to ensure legal certainty and balance. In practice, however, the implementation of employment contracts often faces challenges such as differing interpretations, unequal bargaining positions, and inconsistent application of labor regulations. These issues require an effective and constructive dispute resolution mechanism that can address contractual problems while preserving employment relationships. In the Indonesian labor law system, mediation is recognized as a key non-litigation mechanism facilitated by government-appointed mediators to help parties reach mutually acceptable solutions. This study examines the mediation mechanism for resolving employment agreement disputes in Indonesia and analyzes its role as an alternative to court proceedings that emphasizes deliberation, efficiency, and cooperation. Using a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study analyzes relevant labor laws, mediation regulations, and legal doctrines through a comprehensive literature review. The findings show that mediation is conducted through structured stages, including dispute registration with labor authorities, mediator appointment, facilitated negotiations, and the formulation of agreements or written recommendations. Mediation effectively promotes consensual solutions, reduces procedural complexity, and encourages cooperative communication. It also supports the preservation of harmonious and sustainable employment relationships by prioritizing consensus over adversarial processes. Strengthening mediator competence and improving legal awareness among workers and employers are therefore crucial to optimizing the effectiveness of mediation in resolving employment agreement disputes in Indonesia.

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has opened up exciting new horizons in the field of Islamic law including visually impaired people. Thanks to its ability to process data quickly and in a structured manner, AI is seen as a potential instrument to support the legal deduction process. However, the use of AI in the realm of legal decision making is not simple. There are fundamental ethical and epistemological problems, because these digital devices do not have fiqh intuition, a moral compass, let alone a deep understanding of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah. This study uses qualitative research through a literature review. This study tries to dissect the position of AI in the view of the consensus (ijma') of ulama and its relevance to current innovation trends. Based on the analysis carried out, an agreement was found among ulama that AI should be positioned as a mere analytical tool that remains under the control of sharia experts. Even though AI is very superior in speeding up reference searches and mapping arguments from classical texts, the authority of a mujtahid in establishing laws cannot be replaced by machines. This research emphasizes that the main key to utilizing AI lies in ethical management and strict regulations. Collaboration between technology developers and religious institutions is very crucial in ensuring that the use of this technology remains within the corridors of sharia. In the end, AI integration that is in line with the principles of maqāṣid al-syarī'ah is expected to be able to bring benefits to the people without eroding the integrity and noble values ​​of Islamic law itself.

Abstract. Government data centers in Indonesia face significant challenges related to data integrity and transparency, impacting policy-making accuracy, operational efficiency, and public trust. Data fragmentation, information inconsistency, and vulnerability to manipulation and cyberattacks have become crucial issues. Blockchain technology, with its fundamental characteristics such as decentralization, immutability, cryptography, and consensus mechanisms, offers innovative solutions to address these problems. This research employs a systematic literature review and conceptual analysis approach to identify how blockchain principles can be effectively applied. The proposed conceptual model, which utilizes permissioned blockchains like Hyperledger Fabric and distributed storage systems such as the InterPlanetary File System (IPFS), demonstrates significant potential in creating a secure, transparent, and auditable data ecosystem. Blockchain implementation is expected to enhance data security, strengthen auditability, prevent fraud, improve operational efficiency, securely manage digital identities, and increase data availability and redundancy. Although implementation challenges exist, including technical complexity, immature regulations, costs, and human resource gaps, global case studies and initial initiatives in Indonesia indicate significant feasibility and benefits. This report recommends a holistic approach encompassing adaptive regulatory development, infrastructure and human resource investment, phased pilot projects, and multi-stakeholder collaboration to realize blockchain's full potential in improving government data governance.   Keywords: Blockchain, Cybersecurity, Data Integrity, Data Transparency, Government Data Center

In the customary law system, there is a pattern of punishment and prosecution which is more or less similar to the Islamic legal system, where the role of the victim's family is very important in determining whether or not the perpetrator will be prosecuted and punished. In customary law, legal settlements are carried out with an emphasis on togetherness or harmony. Settlement of criminal cases, especially bullying through customary law, is a process of resolving cases outside of court which consists of first, a mediation system with a consensus approach through deliberation. Second, the restorative justice system is a case resolution system with the aim of restoring the situation that arose for the victim so that a sense of brotherhood between each party is re-established. This system produces an agreement that is a win-win solution, guarantees the confidentiality of the parties' disputes, avoids delays caused by procedural and administrative matters, and resolves problems comprehensively together and while maintaining good relations. Thus, these customary sanctions do not provide legal protection and fulfillment of children's rights for children who are victims of sexual violence. In sexual crimes against children, children are positioned as victims who experience detrimental impacts, namely physical and psychological harm. Therefore, it is mandatory to be protected, not judged.