Publication Search

This research aims to determine the influence of the physical work environment, work discipline and work stress on employee performance at the UD Bunga Mas brown sugar factory. The variables used in this research are Physical Work Environment (X1), Work Discipline (X2), Work Stress (X3), and Employee Performance (Y). The research location is the UD Bunga Mas Brown Sugar Factory which is located in Karanglo Hamlet, Tales Village RT 01 RW 04 Ngadiluwih District, Kediri Regency. By using data collection techniques in the form of interviews, questionnaires and observations.Meanwhile, the analysis used uses quantitative methods with multiple linear regression tools using the SPSS version 25.0 software program. Based on tests carried out by partial linear regression analysis, it shows that the Physical Work Environment (X1) has a negative and insignificant effect on Employee Performance (Y) and Work Discipline (X2) has a positive and insignificant effect on Employee Performance (Y). Meanwhile, the Job Stress variable (X3) has a negative and significant influence on Employee Performance (Y). This shows a significant value for variable X1 0.116 > 0.05, variable X2 0.538 > 0.05, and X3 0.000 < 0.05. Partially, the Physical Work Environment (X1), Work Discipline (X2), and Work Stress (X3) have a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance (Y) at the UD Bunga Mas Brown Sugar Factory.

Community Health Centers are functional organizational units that carry out comprehensive, integrated, equitable health efforts that are acceptable and affordable to the community with the active participation of the community and using the results of the development of appropriate science and technology, at a cost that can be borne by the government and the wider community. in order to achieve optimal health status, without neglecting the quality of service to individuals and the community.

This research is motivated that in institutions engaged in the health sector, in this organization human resources are very important in achieving the goals and success of the agency. This study aims to determine the influence of work discipline and work stress on employee performance. This study used quantitative methods. The sampling technique uses Nonprobability Sampling with a saturated sampling method of 47 employees. Testing in this study using SPSS software program version 25.0. The analysis techniques used are validity test, reliability test, classical assumption test, multiple linear regression analysis, t test, F test and determination coefficient test. The results of this study show that  partially the variable of work discipline has a positive and significant effect on employee performance with a calculated tvalue of  3.059>ttable 2.01537 with a signification value of 0.004<0.05 and partially the variable of work stress has a positive and significant effect with  a calculated tvalue of  2.468>ttable  2.01537 with a signification value of 0.018<0.05, simultaneously the variables of work discipline and work stress have a positive and significant effect on employee performance  with a calculated Fvalue of  8.265>Ftable 3.21 with a signification value of 0.001<0.05.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of work discipline on employee performance, analyze the effect of work stress on employee performance, and analyze the effect of work motivation on employee performance. The object of this research is at Bank BRI Cabang Pattimura Semarang. The method in this study is a survey research method with a quantitative approach. The population in this study were all employees at Bank BRI Cabang Pattimura Semarang. The number of samples in this study were 80 respondents who were obtained using saturated sampling, namely the sampling technique when all members of the population are used as samples. Methods of data collection through questionnaires and data analysis using SPSS which includes validity test, reliability test, classic assumption test, multiple linear regression analysis, hypothesis testing using t test, R² test. The results showed that the independent variables, namely work discipline (X1), work stress (X2), work motivation (X3) have a positive and significant effect on employee performance (Y) partially or simultaneously (together). Based on the coefficient of determination of 0.565, which means that the variables of work discipline (X1), work stress (X2), and work motivation (X3) are simultaneously able to explain the employee performance variable (Y) of 56.5%. The remaining 43.5% of employee performance (Y) is explained by other variables not included in this study.

History of the Development of Philosophy We can conclude that Philosophy, as a scientific discipline that questions the nature of existence, knowledge, values, and reality, has gone through a long journey and is full of revolutionary thoughts throughout human history. The development of this philosophy not only reflects changes in human views of the world, but also emerges as a response to intellectual challenges, social changes, and scientific developments that have occurred from time to time. The earliest period in the history of the development of philosophy is the philosophy of ancient Greece. In ancient Greece, philosophers such as Thales, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle introduced fundamental questions about the universe, ethics, politics, and knowledge. They try to understand the universe and human place in it through reason and reason. After the Greek classical period, philosophy underwent changes during the medieval period. During this time, Patristic and Scholastic philosophy became dominant. Patristic philosophy is closely related to early Christian thought and the influence of Church Fathers such as St. Augustine. At the same time, Scholastic philosophy, influenced by the work of Aristotle, attempted to integrate philosophy with Christian theology. The next period in the history of philosophy is the Age of Enlightenment, during which philosophy underwent major shifts. Philosophers such as Descartes, Kant, and Voltaire advocated ideas of rationality, freedom, and scientific progress. They challenge traditional dogma and authority and advance knowledge through rational thinking and the scientific method. The development of modern philosophy also includes schools such as German idealism led by figures such as Kant, Hegel, and Schopenhauer. They focus on thinking about consciousness, ideals, and oneness in search of an understanding of reality. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, important schools such as empiricism and utilitarianism emerged. Philosophers such as John Locke, David Hume, and Jeremy Bentham stressed the importance of experience and utility as the foundations of knowledge and ethics. Then, pragmatism and the analytic school, pioneered by figures such as William James, Bertrand Russell, and Ludwig Wittgenstein, put forward the practical use of knowledge and language in achieving a better understanding. Contemporary philosophy involves various schools of thought. Schools such as phenomenology (Husserl), existentialism (Sartre, Camus), hermeneutics (Gadamer, Ricoeur), and structure.