Publication Search

The assessment rating of bank hlth is expected to evalute the prformance of the banking industry. Because bank healtiness represent good financial condition and good management. Risk-based Bank Rating (RBBR) method is used Bank Indonesia as a standard to appraise the rating of the bank health. This study to find out the sundeness level of bank in terms of the aspects of Risk profille, Good Corporate Govermance (GCG), Earnings, and Capital. This was an deskriptif analysis, with the object study is BPR Supra Artapersada Kc. Cibadak, PT. the data were collected through documentation and date analysis techniquen was an analysis of the soundness of bank using the Risk-Bases Bank Rating approach with an assesment converage including Non Ferforming loand, Loan to Deposit Rating, Good Corporate Governmence, Return on Assets, Operational costs on operating income, and Capital Adequacy Ratio factors. The resulth howed the condition of BPR Supra Artapersada Kc. Cibadak, PT. at “healthy criteria” with Non performing Loand of 1,8%, Loan to Deposit Rating of 85%, Maximum credit limit of 0,083%, Return on Assets of 0,034%, Operational costs on operating income of 0,070%, and Capital Adequacy Ratio of 41%..

This study aims to determine the comparison of the soundness level of PT.  Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk based on Bank Indonesia Regulation (PBI) No.13/1/PBI/2011 concerning Assessment of Commercial Bank Validity Level using RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Eaming and Capital). The period used in his research was 5 years, starting from 2018 to 2022. The type of research used is descriptive research kualitative. The data obtained is in the form of secondary data in the form of annual financial statements of PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.  This study used an assessment method based on the calculation of each variable. Risk Profile assessment uses Non Performing Loan (NPL) and Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) ratios. Good Corporate Governance uses the results of Self Assessment of GCG implementation that has been published by PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. Earnings valuation uses the ratio of Return On Asset (ROA) and Operating Expense Against Operating Income (BOPO).. Capital uses the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). The results of research and data analysis using RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital) methods can be concluded that PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk received a Composite Rating of 1 (PK-1) with the predicate "Very Healthy". This is evidenced by PT Bank Central Asia Tbk obtaining an average composite value of 97.33% and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk of 94.00% for the past 5 years. So it is proven that PT Bank Central Asia has a higher performance than PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

The purpose of the study was to specify the increase in financial performance for the pandemic in pharmaceutical division. PT. Kalbe Farma Tbk registed on Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX). The approach method used is the quantitative descriptive approach. The species of data used is secondary data facile from the Indonesia Stock Exchange, ie financial statements of PT. Kalbe Farma Tbk from 2018 to 2021. The ratio analysis used in this study includes analysis of liquidity, solvency, activity and profitability ratios. As a result, the liquidity and solvency ratios over the past four years have been in good shape for the company as it has been competent to meet all its obligations, but the profitability and activity ratios have fluctuated and are trending downward. It was shown that there was Researchers say PT. Kalbe Farma Tbk uses ratio analysis to measure financial performance, and the results generally increase percentages, but not significantly.      

Bond ratings are character symbols given by rating agencies to indicate the risk of a bond. This study aims to determine the effect of Leverage using debt to equity ratio (DER) calculations, Profitability using Return on Assets (ROA) calculations on Bond Ratings using calculations according to Bond Rating Interpretations in Financial Services Companies in the Banking Sector at PT. Pefindo for the 2017 – 2021 period used a purposive sampling technique to obtain 6 companies in a period of 5 years so that 30 samples were observed. The data analysis method used in this study is the panel data regression model. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, that Leverage has a negative effect and Profitability has no effect on Bond Ratings.