Publication Search

This research is aimed at analyzing the level of bank health at PT BPR Bank Jombang Perseroda which was carried out using RGEC method. The data used comes from the financial reports of PT BPR Bank Jombang Perseroda for the 2018-2022 period or five years and 40 company data was found. The RGEC method was employed during the data analysis. Based on the conducted analysis, it was discovered that PT BPR Bank Jombang Perseroda had a fairly excellent rating from 2018 to 2022 (Composite rating 3).    

This research aims to analyze the level of bank health and performance of Indonesian sharia banks using the RGEC method during the 2021-2022 period. Through this holistic approach, the research examines aspects of bank health, including risk profile, good corporate governance, income and capital. Data was obtained from the financial report of PT Bank Syariah Indonesia Tbk, and analysis was carried out on credit risk, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Return on Assets (ROA), and Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). Research findings show that Indonesian sharia banks demonstrate health and stability in their operations, despite a decline in several performance indicators. These conclusions provide valuable insights for stakeholders in the Islamic banking industry to improve bank performance and stability.    

This research aims to determine the effectiveness of assessing banking soundness levels using the PT RGEC method. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk in 2018-2020. In this research, researchers used several research variables which include Risk Profile (NPL and LDR), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings (ROA, ROE, NIM, BOPO) and Capital (CAR). Based on research on the effectiveness of assessing the level of banking health at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk, using the RGEC method, shows that the bank's health status is in accordance with the standards set by Bank Indonesia regulations. For the 2018 period it can be concluded that PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk received a composite rating of 1, namely "Very Healthy" with a composite score of 90%, for the 2019 period it can be concluded that PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk received a composite rating of 1, namely "Very Healthy" with a composite score of 92.5%, for the 2020 period it can be concluded that PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk received a composite rating of 1, namely "Very Healthy" with a composite score of 90%. As well as the bank's health level in terms of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, earnings and Capital indicators at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk for 2018-2020 is "Very Healthy". It is hoped that future researchers will be more careful in carrying out calculations, can use better methods than this research and can add ratios so that the results of the research are more robust.

This study aims to see how the difference in financial performance between state-owned banks and national private banks through analysis from 2019 to 2022, using the RGEC approach to measure the level of bank health and the Zmijewski model to measure financial distress. With descriptive and comparative research types, as well as a quantitative approach, secondary data from four state-owned banks (Mandiri, BRI, BNI, BTN) and four private banks (BCA, CIMB, Danamon, Permata) were used. The analysis shows that private banks and state-owned banks do not have significantly different health levels in terms of risk profile (LDR and NPL), GCG, and earnings (NIM, ROA, BOPO). However, there are differences in the capital aspect (CAR). Overall, based on the Zmijewski X-score method, between private banks and state-owned banks do not have significantly different financial distress conditions. In conclusion, from 2019 to 2022, both state-owned banks and private banks show healthy financial conditions. Even though there are differences in the capital aspect, the overall health of state-owned banks is not significantly different from private banks.