Publication Search

The biggest problem for children who are faced with the law is because of Law no. 3 of 1997 regarding Juvenile Court is no longer relevant, both from the juridical, philosophical and sociological aspects. This law does not provide the right solution for the handling of children as children in conflict with the law. Children who are in conflict with the law that is resolved in court, result in mental and psychological pressure on the child who is in conflict with the law, thus disturbing the child's development and development. Thus, there is a need for a criminal law policy in handling bullying. The research method used in this research is juridical empirical by looking at the facts that exist in practice in the field. The research objective is to explain policies in law enforcement against child bullies. Settlement of the criminal law for bullying offenders against student victims of violence at school has not been going well because bullying has not been regulated in a law that specifically regulates it.   Keywords : children, underage, criminal law, policy, bullying.

Thomas Aquinas (1225/1224-1274) is one of greatest thinker in the history of Medieval philosophy. He wrote his par excellence work, called Summa Theologiae. It is a theological work but rich with philosophical arguments. He established his arguments by citing Greek thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle. One of Thomas’ important argument is the prove of God’s existence or what nowdays calls as The Five Ways. Thomas presents his readers that God exists and proves it philosophically than theologically. Richard Dawkins (1941 - ) revives The Five Ways to modern readers by critizing Thomas’ arguments in his The God Delusion. Dawkins bases his critique on the evident character of modern science. His critique is supported by his Darwinism background and his efforts to promote atheism. According to Dawkins, The Five Ways does not prove anything about God. This article tries to examine and interprateThomas’ arguments on The Five Way and how Dawkins reads and critizes it from atheism point of view.