Publication Search

This study aims to explore students’ perceptions of the implementation of the Pancasila Student Profile Reinforcement Project (P5) based on deep learning within the Islamic Religious Education (PAI) subject at SMA Fajrul Islam. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method with data collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation. Interviews were conducted with 10 students from grades X and XI. The findings indicate that students perceive the deep learning–based P5 as a more meaningful and enjoyable learning process. They reported feeling more motivated to participate in project activities. However, several students also mentioned challenges such as the need for more intensive guidance, differences in group members’ discipline, and project-related costs that they considered burdensome. Overall, students’ perceptions of this learning model are positive, as it is viewed as effective in enhancing understanding, participation, and character development in alignment with the goals of the P5 program.  

The focus of research are : 1. What are the Perceptions of Intensive Program Students towards Study Discipline at IDIA 2. What are the Supporting and Inhibiting Factors for Learning Discipline at IDIA in the Intensive Program. In this research, researcher used a qualitative approach. The data collection method in this research uses interviews and documentation. And the informants in this research came from Mudir Ma'had Lil-Banat, Naibah Mudir Ma'had Lil-Banat, academic section teacher, Student Executive Council Boarding Ma’had (BEMA), and IDIA intensive program students. The perception of intensive program students towards the learning discipline at IDIA is very positive. This can be seen from the different opinions and expressions in expressing perceptions about learning discipline at IDIA in the intensive program. Supporting factors for learning discipline in the intensive program at IDIA are the existence of clear regulations, the professionalism of internship teachers, and the existence of good and strong cooperation between internship teachers and BEMA. Meanwhile, the inhibiting factors are the different characters or dispositions of intensive program students, teachers/instructors who cannot be present while teaching, and limited learning environment.