Publication Search

This study discusses the discourse of fiqh al-nawāzil which is rooted in the fundamental disparity between Islamic Family Law (classical inheritance and will law) and Contemporary Law (Hajj queue regulation Law No. 8 of 2019 and fiat of the transfer of one person to the Director General of PHU No. 130 of 2020). This background raises a normative dilemma when the right to worship (al-haq al-'ibādi) is threatened with forfeiture because classical instruments clash with the principle of lā waṣiyyata li wārith and the limits of al-thuluth. The main purpose of this research is to propose a Mandatory Will as a transformative solution of Islamic Law to provide a fair and strong sharia foundation for the existing state administrative policies. The method used is Fiqh al-Nawāzil with the approach of Istislah (Maslahah Mursalah) and Qiyās Istiḥsānī, which places the portion of Hajj as an obligation that must be fulfilled (al-wājib al-waṣiyyah) equivalent to debt, so that it can methodologically neutralize the limitation of classical inheritance. The conclusion shows that the Obligatory Will has succeeded in bridging this conflict, providing a Legal Impact in the form of modernizing Islamic Family Law, and affirming the ability of Islamic Law to realize maqāṣid al-sharī'ah (ḥifẓ al-dīn and ḥifẓ al-māl) in the contemporary era. The recommendation urges that amendments to the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) and hajj regulations (including the strengthening of Kepdirjen 130/2020) be immediately carried out to institutionalize the Obligatory Will, accompanied by the DSN/MUI Fatwa to prevent the commercialization (tadāwul) of the hajj portion and ensure substantive justice for the heirs.

Divorce has a significant impact on a child's psychological and social development, particularly in the aspect of determining custody rights, which should prioritize the principle of the child's best interests. This study aims to analyze the balance between Islamic legal norms as stipulated in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) and positive law in Indonesia, in cases where children under the age of 12 express a desire to live with their father after the divorce. The research approach used is a juridical-normative with a qualitative analysis method that focuses on a literature review of laws and regulations such as the KHI, the Marriage Law, the Child Protection Law, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, as well as relevant legal and jurisprudential literature. The results of the study indicate that although normatively the KHI prioritizes the mother as the caregiver of children under 12 years old, there is room for flexibility that allows the court to consider the child's wishes if it better ensures the child's welfare and safety. This approach is supported by the principle of maslahah mursalah in Islamic law, which allows adjustments for the benefit of the child. The main challenges in its implementation include the minimal involvement of professionals such as child psychologists in the evaluation process, the existence of gender stereotypes that influence judges' decisions, and emotional conflicts between parents that often override the interests of the child. Therefore, this study recommends that judicial institutions actively involve psychologists and mediators in custody proceedings, improve training for judges in understanding the psychosocial dynamics of children, and update legal guidelines so that children's wishes can be assessed objectively. Furthermore, education to the wider public about the importance of gender non-discrimination in child care is also needed so that custody decisions truly reflect the principles of comprehensive child protection and welfare.

This paper focuses on the legal thought of Imam Malik bin Anas through a social historical approach. This study represents a relatively new area in Islamic legal scholarship, and therefore, it has garnered limited attention from academics. Imam Malik is one of the four imams of the Sunni schools of thought, known as ahlu hadits. Throughout his life, he never left the city of Madinah except for the pilgrimage to Mecca. His residence in Madinah, the place where the Prophet lived, greatly supported his ability to address various legal issues, most of which could be resolved through hadith. The environment of Madinah, characterized by relatively simple social problems, also influenced Imam Malik's approach. Although he is recognized as ahlu hadits, he was nonetheless affected by the use of reason in ijtihad due to the social conditions of his time. This is evidenced by his application of principles such as the practices of the people of Madinah (Amal ahli Madinah), the fatwas of the companions (sahabat), qiyas (analogical reasoning), al-maslahah mursalah (public interest), az-zari'ah (preventive measures), and al-'urf (custom) in deriving Islamic law. Like other schools of thought, Imam Malik regarded the Qur'an and hadith as primary sources in legal decision-making.