Publication Search

Non-litigation legal assistance in land dispute resolution is carried out by the Ansor Legal Aid Institute (LBH Ansor). This assistance is crucial considering the complexity of land law and the high demand of the community, especially vulnerable groups, for access to fast, efficient, and low-cost conflict resolution. This research is driven by the low public understanding of non-litigation mechanisms and the challenges in realizing proportional access to justice. The main objective is to comprehensively document the assistance procedures and identify the applied advocacy model. This research method uses a normative legal approach with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study describe that LBH Ansor plays a strategic role as a mediator and legal facilitator, which includes initial case assessment, preparation of a mediation framework, and assistance in negotiations between the disputing parties. The main findings show that LBH Ansor's non-litigation assistance practices have successfully increased the effectiveness of land dispute resolution by prioritizing the principles of restorative justice and peace agreements, while also providing a replicable model for increasing access to justice outside the courts.

Problematic financing is an unavoidable risk for banks in providing financial services. This situation can occur when the debtor fails to fulfill his obligations to the bank, either due to business failure or deliberately not paying financing obligations according to the agreement due to the debtor's bad character. This research aims to identify the factors and impacts of problematic financing in sharia banking, the resolution mechanism, as well as the regulation and relevance of sharia economic law in resolving these problems. The method used is normative juridical (legal research) which focuses on studying the application of applicable positive legal rules or norms and is related to the substance of the research. The research results show that problematic financing factors originate from internal factors (managerial errors) and external factors (debtor errors). Resolving problematic financing can be done through alternative dispute resolution or litigation (resolved by the court). Meanwhile, sharia economic law regulations regarding the resolution of problematic financing can be carried out by means of tahkim, through qadhi, or resolved by means of al-ishlah.

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of Managerial Ownership, Debt Convenant and Litigation Risk on Accounting Conservatism. The population in this study consisted of manufacturing companies, the consumer goods industry sub-sector which were listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2018. A sample of 12 companies used in this study was found by purposive sampling method. The data used is secondary data. Data analysis was performed with descriptive statistics using panel data regression analysis techniques. The empirical results of this study indicate that independent Debt Convenant does not have a statistically significant effect on Accounting Conservatism while Managerial Ownership and Litigation Risk have a significant negative effect on Accounting Conservatism. The results show that managerial ownership has a significant positive effect on Accounting Conservatism, and Litigation Risk has a significant positive effect on Accounting Conservatism, debt agreements do not have a significant effect on Accounting Conservatism, and managerial ownership, litigation risk together have an effect on Accounting Conservatism.