Publication Search

This study aims to develop a PAFE (KPK FPB BOARD) learning medium for KPK and FPB materials for fifth-grade students at SDN 47 Gresik. This research uses the ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate) model, which focuses on the analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation, and feasibility testing of the resulting learning media. This media was developed as an interactive tool capable of increasing learning interest, strengthening conceptual understanding, and providing a more enjoyable learning experience. The results indicate that Math Space media meets three main aspects of educational media development: validity, practicality, and effectiveness. In terms of validity, the media expert's assessment obtained a percentage of 95% and a percentage of 80.9%, respectively. Based on the average of the two results, the percentage obtained was 87.9%, making it highly valid. In terms of practicality and effectiveness, the N-gain calculation result of 0.80 is categorized as very effective, thus demonstrating that the use of the media significantly improves understanding of the KPK and FPB concepts. In terms of practicality, student responses reached 92.8%, indicating that this media is highly practical, easy to use, engaging, and supports independent learning. Overall, the PAFE (KPK FPB BOARD) learning media was deemed feasible, practical, and effective for use in mathematics learning, particularly in KPK and FPB. Furthermore, this media is flexible and can be used for both in-class and out-of-class learning.

This study aims to (1) describe the development of Dakpin media for learning the concepts of Greatest Common Factor (GCF) and Least Common Multiple (LCM) for fourth-grade students at MI Tarbiyatul Banin, and (2) determine the validity of the developed media. The research employed the ADDIE development model, consisting of Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate stages. The study was conducted at MI Tarbiyatul Banin during the first semester, involving 11 fourth-grade students as research subjects. Data were collected through material and media expert validation questionnaires, student response questionnaires, tests, observations, and interviews. The results indicate that the Dakpin media was successfully developed through all stages of the ADDIE model and was considered highly valid for use in mathematics learning. Validation results showed an average score of 93.75% from material experts and 94.79% from media experts, both categorized as “very valid.” In addition, student responses toward the use of Dakpin media reached 91%, indicating a highly positive reception. These findings suggest that Dakpin media is appropriate and effective as a learning tool to support students’ understanding of GCF and LCM concepts in elementary mathematics learning.

This study aims to analyze the dynamics of interest groups in the food vendor appointment process in Medan City, particularly those based on political proximity. Using a qualitative approach with library research method and content analysis technique, data were collected from official documents, government reports, accredited scientific journals, laws and regulations, and publications from institutions such as the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the Government Procurement Policy Institute (LKPP), and the Statistics Indonesia (BPS). The analysis shows that the food vendor appointment process in Medan City is not entirely meritocratic. Political proximity and personal relationships play a dominant role as informal mechanisms in vendor selection. Procurement transparency remains limited, as reflected in the low public access to tender documents and vendor evaluations. This practice indicates systemic political patronage, which results in budget inefficiency, a decline in the quality of public services, and an erosion of public trust. This study recommends strengthening the electronic procurement system (e-procurement), increasing participatory oversight, and reforming the bureaucracy at the regional level.

Integrity is a fundamental value in realizing clean, transparent, and accountable public sector governance. Various integrity assessment instruments have been implemented in the public sector in Indonesia, such as the Integrity Assessment Survey (SPI) by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the Integrity Zone (ZI) by the Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform (PANRB), and IntoSAINT developed by INTOSAI. However, all three still have limitations. This study aims to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of these three instruments and develop an alternative assessment tool, the Integrity Assessment Tool (IAT), which can be an alternative choice to the integrity assessment model in Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative descriptive approach through literature studies and analysis of integrity policy documents, with a theoretical foundation of the OECD Integrity Framework and the Anti-Bribery Management System (SNI ISO 37001). The results show that the Integrity Assessment Tool is able to assess organizational integrity comprehensively and objectively through four main dimensions: history, performance, potential, and perception. This approach integrates quantitative, qualitative, and psychometric aspects to produce a more accurate and sustainable picture of the integrity position of public sector organizations. Theoretically, this research enriches the study of public sector integrity management, while practically, it provides guidance for government agencies in building a measurable, systematic, and sustainable integrity evaluation system as a basis for establishing a national model for integrity assessment.

Penelitian ini menganalisis efektivitas hukum pelaksanaan lelang kendaraan dinas melalui Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang (KPKNL) dalam memperkuat transparansi pengelolaan aset pemerintah. Permasalahan penelitian difokuskan pada bagaimana implementasi empiris mekanisme lelang berkontribusi, apakah pelaksanaan telah memenuhi Peraturan Menteri Keuangan, serta faktor kelembagaan yang memengaruhi efektivitasnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji kesesuaian antara kerangka regulatif dan praktik administratif dalam pelaksanaan lelang kendaraan dinas. Penelitian hukum empiris serta pendekatan kualitatif diaplikasikan sebagai metode dengan melaksanakan wawancara dan studi dokumen di KPKNL Madiun. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan lelang elektronik meningkatkan transparansi prosedural melalui keterbukaan informasi, mekanisme yang terstandar, dan proses yang dapat ditelusuri. Namun, transparansi substantif masih dipengaruhi oleh kesiapan administrasi, koordinasi antar instansi, serta literasi digital masyarakat. Dengan demikian, lelang kendaraan dinas efektif secara prosedural, tetapi memerlukan penguatan kelembagaan guna mewujudkan tata kelola aset yang transparan dan akuntabel secara optimal.

Corruption remains a systemic challenge in Indonesia, particularly in the administration of government grant funding, undermining public trust, institutional integrity, and sustainable development. Despite the establishment of the Corruption Eradication Commission (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, KPK) and other specialized bodies, law enforcement continues to face institutional, political, and cultural barriers. This study explores how Islamic criminal law can strengthen anti-corruption strategies by integrating empirical legal practices with normative religious principles. Using a normative-empirical socio-legal approach, the research combines case studies of KPK’s enforcement processes with doctrinal analysis of fiqh jināyah. Data were collected through legal document analysis, policy reviews, and qualitative evaluations of institutional reports and court rulings. Findings indicate that Islamic legal concepts such as khiyānah (breach of trust), ghulūl (misappropriation of public assets), amānah (trustworthiness), ʿadl (justice), and maṣlaḥah (public interest) provide a strong ethical foundation that complements positive law enforcement. While KPK has demonstrated effectiveness in investigation, prosecution, and prevention, its performance is constrained by political pressure, regulatory gaps, and limited resources. The study concludes that embedding Islamic ethical principles into governance, legal education, and public administration can enhance institutional accountability, reinforce preventive measures, and cultivate a culture of integrity. This normative convergence advances socio-legal pluralism and offers practical insights for value-based anti-corruption policy in Indonesia.

Digital transformation in the management of state property is a necessary step towards achieving transparent and accountable governance. The Minstry of Finance, through the Directorate General of State Assets, has developed the State Asset Management Information System Version 2 application as a means of digital based management, but its implementation still faces challenges related to interest in its use by work unit operators. This study aims to evaluate the impact of intentions, attitudes, and subjective norms on interest in using the SIMAN V2 application at the Surabaya State Assets and Auction Service Office using the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) approach. Using a quantitative design through a survey, this study was conducted at the Surabaya KPKNL with subjects being SIMAN V2 application operators in work units in the working area. Data colection techniques used a questionnaire with a Likert scale. Data analysis was performed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) based on Partial Least Square (PLS) using SmartPLS software. The results of the study indicate that intention, attitude, and subjective norms have a positive and significant effect on interest in using the SIMAN V2 application. This study shows that psychological and social factors play an important role in supporting technology adoption in the public sector. The conclusion emphasizes that increased interest in use can be achieved by strengthening individual intentions, forming positive attitudes, and providing workplace support. Increased socialization, ongoing technical training, and recommendations for further research institutional supportfrom agencies to optimize the use of the SIMAN V2 application.

This kind of research can reveal a purpose, namely to be able to carry out an analysis of the important role of the government together with the community in realizing policies to combat corruption of village funds. It is necessary to understand that village funds have been made one of the government's priority programs in order to increase the level of prosperity of rural communities and village development through the Village Law. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify policy solutions provided by the government and the community to prevent corruption of village funds. This study utilizes a literature study method through a qualitative approach that can be used to assess the role of the government and the community in implementing policies to combat corruption of village funds as an effort to uphold the integrity of the village administration system. Meanwhile, the research data sources obtained came from secondary data, which included the collection of scientific journals in the last five years, reading books in the last ten years, reports in the mass media, and government regulations. The findings of this study describe that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has identified several loopholes that are often exploited by village officials in misappropriating Village Funds. Then there were 98 cases of corruption that caused the state to lose up to Rp. 37.2 billion. This creates an urgency for the government and the community to play a role in creating village regulations that are capable of overcoming corruption of village funds.

. Corruption is an extraordinary crime that has a systemic impact on economic stability, governance and the protection of human rights. Indonesia and Singapore show significant differences in the effectiveness of corruption eradication, despite both applying the rule of law principle. Indonesia established the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) through Law Number 30 of 2002 jo. Law No. 19/2019 as an independent institution with powers to investigate and prosecute, but its effectiveness has been weakened by political interference, regulatory revisions, and bureaucratic obstacles. Singapore, on the other hand, relies on the Corrupt Practices Investigation (CPIB) under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1960, which has historical legitimacy, stable political support, and consistent regulations. This difference in effectiveness is reflected in the 2024 Corruption Perception Index, where Indonesia ranks 99th with a score of 37/100, while Singapore ranks 3rd with a score of 84/100. Although the KPK normatively has broader authority, 2024, where Indonesia ranked 99th with a score of 37/100, while Singapore ranked 3rd with a score of 84/100. Although the KPK normatively has broader authority, empirical results show that the success of corruption eradication is determined by institutional integrity, regulatory consistency, and structural independence. This research uses a normative juridical method with a literature study approach and deductive thinking method to analyze the legal basis, and implementation of the two institutions. The results of this study found that the differences between the anti-corruption institutions of the two countries do not merely depend on legal instruments, but on political structure, organizational culture, and institutional commitment in upholding integrity. It is expected to provide normative recommendations to strengthen Indonesia's anti-corruption institution, namely the KPK, through structural, regulative, and institutional reforms