Publication Search

In a transaction, especially electronic goods cannot be separated from the possibility of defects or damage to goods, thus causing electronic goods manufacturers to provide guarantees (warranties) to consumers. Law Number 8 Article 27 Letter (e) of 1999 discusses consumer protection, which one of the articles is the period for demanding damaged goods is 4 years or in accordance with the contract, not exceeding the maximum period. This study aims to describe the period of return of electronic goods warranty system from the perspective of shafi'I school of thought and the period of return of electronic goods warranty system according to consumer protection law number 8 article 27 letter (e) of 1999. The research method used is a qualitative method through data techniques in the form of, observation, and documentation. The analysis technique uses the content analysis method. The results of the study concluded that: Imam Shafi'i Mazhab argues that the state of khiyar is not more than three days, it is a relief (rukshah).  In transactions, especially electronic products, manufacturers use a warranty system that is in accordance with Law No. 8 Article 27 letter (e). The period to sue for defective goods is 4 years or according to the contract, not exceeding the maximum period.

This study aims to determine the guarantee of the consumer protection institution foundation for consumer rights to the forced recall of vehicles. The research method used is an empirical legal research method using a descriptive approach and qualitative analysis techniques. The results of this study show that YLKI's role in guaranteeing consumer rights regarding the case of the forced withdrawal of motorized vehicles by the leasing party includes providing awareness to the public and providing advocacy and legal consultation for consumers who experience losses. On the first point In order to increase consumer awareness, LKY consistently strives to carry out community-based activities so that more and more people can find out about the materials or messages being disseminated to increase understanding and awareness of consumer rights. While providing advocacy and legal consultations for consumers who have experienced losses as an effort to fight for the rights of consumers who have suffered losses from finance companies. The two roles mentioned above are a form of guarantee of legal protection for consumers who experience losses.

This study aims to determine the guarantee of the consumer protection institution foundation for consumer rights to the forced recall of vehicles. The research method used is an empirical legal research method using a descriptive approach and qualitative analysis techniques. The results of this study show that YLKI's role in guaranteeing consumer rights regarding the case of the forced withdrawal of motorized vehicles by the leasing party includes providing awareness to the public and providing advocacy and legal consultation for consumers who experience losses. On the first point In order to increase consumer awareness, LKY consistently strives to carry out community-based activities so that more and more people can find out about the materials or messages being disseminated to increase understanding and awareness of consumer rights. While providing advocacy and legal consultations for consumers who have experienced losses as an effort to fight for the rights of consumers who have suffered losses from finance companies. The two roles mentioned above are a form of guarantee of legal protection for consumers who experience losses.

This research examines more deeply the analysis of legal certainty for victims of Doni Salmanan's fraud in trading through an application called QUOTEX. In relation to the decision of the Bale Bandung District Court number 576/Pid.Sus/2022/PN BlB, in which the Panel of Judges gave a verdict of imprisonment and confiscation of assets owned by the defendant generated through trading by utilizing his victims for profit and the assets were confiscated by the state. However, in the verdict there was no decision at all to provide compensation to the victim of Doni Salmanan's fraud, in this case the element of legal justice for the victim was not fulfilled by this decision. However, the aspect of legal certainty for the victim is very strong so that the defendant gets a death sentence and a fine for his actions. The legal certainty in question is a guarantee that the law is carried out properly in processing the rights and obligations of the defendant for his crime. Material law as an element of legal certainty has been carried out and linked to various laws and regulations relating to the case. Law No. 8/1999 on Consumer Protection for the losses suffered by the victim as a consumer, Law No. 19/2016 on the Amendment to Law No. 11/2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions because the case involved electronic networking devices, and Law No. 8/2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering because in the prosecution the defendant was deemed to have disguised his wealth generated through criminal acts.