Publication Search

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), financial performance, and Earning Per Share (EPS) on firm value. The object of this research consists of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2021–2024. This study employs a quantitative approach using secondary data in the form of annual financial statements as the primary source. The sample was selected using purposive sampling based on predetermined criteria, ensuring that only companies with complete data and consistent reporting were included in the analysis. The independent variables analyzed include the audit committee, independent commissioners, institutional ownership, Return on Assets (ROA), and Earning Per Share (EPS). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to process the data in this study, allowing the researchers to examine the simultaneous and partial effects of the variables on firm value. The findings indicate that firm value is significantly influenced by financial performance, particularly ROA, highlighting the importance of operational efficiency and profitability in enhancing shareholder wealth. While certain GCG variables such as institutional ownership showed positive influence, other elements like audit committees and independent commissioners produced mixed results, suggesting that governance mechanisms may have varying effects depending on organizational context. Meanwhile, EPS demonstrated inconsistent results in relation to firm value, implying that market perceptions of earnings may not fully capture the impact on overall firm valuation. This study provides insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate managers on the relative importance of governance and financial indicators in value creation for state-owned enterprises.

This study aims to analyze the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Firm Size, and Sales Growth on Financial Performance at PT Ace Hardware Indonesia Tbk listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2015–2024 period. Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in this study is proxied by institutional ownership, financial performance is measured using Return on Assets (ROA), firm size is measured by the natural logarithm of total assets, and sales growth is measured using the sales growth ratio. This study employed a quantitative method with a descriptive approach. The data used were secondary data in the form of annual financial statements obtained from the official websites of the IDX and the company. Data analysis techniques included descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, multiple and simple linear regression analysis, and hypothesis testing consisting of t-test, F-test, and coefficient of determination with the assistance of SPSS version 27 software. The results of the study indicate that partially, the Good Corporate Governance (GCG) variable has a t-value of -1.526 < t-table 2.447, meaning that it has no significant effect on financial performance. The firm size variable has a t-value of -2.857 > t-table 2.447, indicating a significant negative effect on the company’s financial performance. The sales growth variable has a t-value of 1.593 < t-table 2.447, meaning that it has no significant effect on financial performance. Simultaneously, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), firm size, and sales growth have a significant effect on financial performance, with an F-value of 13.023 > F-table 4.76 and a significance value of 0.005 < 0.05. This study is expected to provide consideration for management and investors in decision-making and serve as a reference for future research in related fields.

This study analyzes the effect of Integrated Reporting (IR) on the Cost of Equity (COE) by examining the moderating role of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) mechanisms in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2020-2024 period. Governance quality is operationalized through two key mechanisms: institutional ownership and the proportion of independent board of commissioners. Employing Process Hayes Model 2 with bootstrap iterations of 5,000, and a final sample of 323 company-year observations after outlier removal, the study finds that Integrated Reporting does not exert a significant direct influence on Cost of Equity. However, the proportion of independent board of commissioners significantly moderates the negative relationship between Integrated Reporting and Cost of Equity, while institutional ownership fails to produce a significant moderating effect. Notably, under conditions of high institutional ownership paired with a low proportion of independent commissioners, Integrated Reporting paradoxically increases the Cost of Equity, underscoring the critical role of internal governance mechanisms in establishing the credibility of disclosed information. These findings confirm that the effectiveness of Integrated Reporting in reducing Cost of Equity is contingent upon the quality of the governance environment- particularly board independence. The study contributes to both theory and practice by demonstrating that the economic benefits of Integrated Reporting are realized only when accompanied by robust independent oversight structures.

This study aims to analyze the influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) mechanisms, proxied by the Board of Commissioners and Audit Committee, as well as Environmental Performance on Financial Performance in food and beverage manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2020-2023 period. The research method used is quantitative, with a purposive sampling technique that resulted in 22 companies as samples, totaling 88 observations over the four-year study period. The research data is secondary data obtained through financial statements and annual reports from the official IDX website. Literature reviews indicate inconsistencies in previous studies; however, the hypothesis of this research suggests that the Board of Commissioners, Audit Committee, and Environmental Performance have a positive and significant effect on the company's financial performance. The board of commissioners and audit committee play a role in strengthening the oversight function to minimize agency costs and improve efficiency. Meanwhile, good environmental performance, measured through PROPER ratings, is expected to enhance the company's positive image in the eyes of investors and stakeholders. 

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Financial Risk, dan Capital terhadap Opini Audit, dengan Earning sebagai variabel intervening dan Reputasi Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) sebagai variabel moderasi, pada perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) periode 2020–2024. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif kausal dengan data panel dari 15 bank yang dipilih secara purposive sampling, sehingga diperoleh 75 observasi bank-tahun. GCG diproksikan dengan jumlah Dewan Direksi dan Komite Audit; Financial Risk diproksikan dengan Non-Performing Loan (NPL) dan Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR); Capital diproksikan dengan Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) dan Debt to Asset Ratio (DAR); Earning diproksikan dengan Return on Assets (ROA) dan Return on Equity (ROE); dan Opini Audit diukur dengan skor 1–5 berdasarkan jumlah catatan tambahan auditor. Data dianalisis menggunakan Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) berbantuan SmartPLS dengan konstruk formatif dan prosedur bootstrapping 5.000 resample. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Financial Risk dan Capital berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap Earning, sedangkan GCG tidak berpengaruh signifikan. GCG dan Capital berpengaruh signifikan meskipun dengan arah negatif terhadap Opini Audit, sementara Financial Risk dan Earning tidak berpengaruh signifikan. Earning tidak terbukti memediasi pengaruh variabel eksogen terhadap Opini Audit, dan Reputasi KAP tidak terbukti memoderasi hubungan Earning-Opini Audit, meskipun berpengaruh positif secara langsung terhadap Opini Audit. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa pada industri perbankan yang sangat teregulasi, opini audit lebih ditentukan oleh kewajaran penyajian laporan keuangan dan kredibilitas auditor dibandingkan kinerja profitabilitas semata.

This research aims to investigate the impact of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) which are measured by 3 indicators; institutional ownership, managerial ownership, board indeoendence, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Tax Avoidance in Multinational Companies on Indonesia. The study used multiple linear regression with periods start from 2022 until 2024. The sample of this study is a multinational companies in Indonesia with the total of 47 samples for 3 years, the criteria of the company can be said multinational companies is if the companies had a entities in more than one country. Tax avoidance is measured using the Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR), while GCG variables and CSR disclosure are measured based on relevant ownership structures, board composition, and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) index. The result shows that Institutional ownership had a significantly negative effect of tax avoidance, while the other three independent variables had no significant power in Tax Avoidance. This study concludes that tax avoidance in multinational companies is a complex phenomenon influenced by various internal and external factors beyond the scope of this research. The findings provide practical implications for regulators and investors and suggest that future research should consider additional variables, longer observation periods, and alternative tax avoidance proxies.

This study discusses the function of corporate criminal liability for State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), particularly SOEs, by examining a case of corruption in the sale of commodities at Perum Bulog Jakarta in 2022-2023, which caused financial losses to the state amounting to approximately IDR 7.192 billion. This case illustrates the abuse of authority by SOE officials, which not only reflects individual violations but also is a symptom of weaknesses in the culture of internal control and compliance in state-owned companies. The purpose of this study is to examine the regulation and application of the principle of corporate criminal liability in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) with reference to Law Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes, the latest Criminal Code (Law Number 1 of 2023), and Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016. The method used is normative legal research with a juridical approach, which focuses on the review of legislation, the concept of corporate criminal liability, and the analysis of related court decisions. The results of the study show that acts of corruption involving Bulog have fulfilled the elements of corporate criminal liability, because they were carried out in the exercise of official authority and were intended for the benefit of the institution. The application of the provisions in the new Criminal Code, particularly Articles 45 to 47 and Article 118, confirms the position of corporations as legal subjects in the criminal law system. The implications of this research highlight the need to strengthen the Good Corporate Governance (GCG) system in SOEs and the need for consistent enforcement of corporate criminal liability by law enforcement officials to ensure justice, transparency, and the prevention of structural corruption in Indonesia.  

The primary focus of this research is to evaluate the influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), profitability levels, and entity scale on the market value of coal mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) between 2021 and 2023. This study adopts a quantitative design by utilizing secondary data from the official IDX website, where 8 companies were selected as samples from a total population of 34 coal sub-sector companies through purposive sampling techniques. Data processing was carried out through panel data regression analysis using Eviews 12 software. The research data indicates that, independently, the implementation of good corporate governance and the level of profit acquisition do not contribute significantly to determining the value of the entity. Conversely, company size is proven to have a significant negative impact. Simultaneous testing confirms that these three independent variables collectively have a significant effect on company value. These findings indicate the need for strategies that consider factors beyond good corporate governance and profitability in efforts to increase company value, such as operational efficiency and proper asset management.

This study aims to analyze the implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) principles at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk as one of the state-owned banks that plays a strategic role in the Indonesian banking system. The implementation of GCG is crucial in maintaining public trust, improving performance, and ensuring business sustainability in the banking sector. This research employs a qualitative method with a descriptive approach, focusing on secondary data analysis obtained from annual reports, corporate governance reports, sustainability reports, and official information published on the website of PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. The results indicate that Bank Mandiri has consistently implemented the principles of transparency, accountability, responsibility, independency, and fairness in its corporate governance system. These principles are reflected in information disclosure practices, clear organizational structures, regulatory compliance, independent decision-making processes, and fair treatment of all stakeholders. Overall, the implementation of GCG at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk contributes positively to strengthening internal control systems, enhancing public trust, and supporting the stability and sustainability of banking operations.

The policy of involving expatriates in the board of directors of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) has become a debated issue, particularly regarding its implications for corporate governance and national workforce interests. The main problem discussed in this article is how the policy of expatriate involvement in the board of directors of PT Garuda Indonesia is viewed from the perspective of Good Corporate Governance (GCG). This study aims to analyze the suitability of the policy with GCG principles and its implications for corporate governance and company performance. The research method used is a literature review by examining laws and regulations, academic journals, policy reports, and other relevant secondary sources. The analysis is conducted based on five main GCG principles, namely transparency, accountability, responsibility, independence, and fairness. The results show that the involvement of expatriates in the board of directors of PT Garuda Indonesia has the potential to strengthen corporate governance through the adoption of global managerial standards, improvement of institutional credibility, and acceleration of organizational transformation and efficiency. However, this policy also faces challenges, especially related to transparency in the selection process and the assurance of knowledge transfer to local human resources. It can be concluded that the expatriate involvement policy will provide optimal benefits if it is implemented consistently with GCG principles and accompanied by a strong commitment to strengthening local managerial capacity.

The revision of the State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) Law fundamentally changes the concept of SOE losses by emphasizing that losses incurred in SOE operations constitute corporate losses, not state financial losses. This change has a direct impact on the construction of directors' accountability, which has often been associated with corruption when companies experience losses. This study aims to analyze the provisions of SOE directors' responsibilities based on Good Corporate Governance (GCG) principles within the new regulatory framework, as well as to examine the application of sanctions against directors who violate these principles and cause corporate losses. The study uses normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The analysis was conducted by examining the provisions of the Limited Liability Company Law, the revised SOE Law, related implementing regulations, and several important decisions, such as those concerning Jiwasraya, Asabri, Garuda Indonesia, and Pertamina-TPPI. The results show that the principles of GCG, fiduciary duty, and the Business Judgment Rule are the primary instruments in assessing directors' actions. Civil and administrative sanctions are the first line of defense for assessing directors' accountability, while criminal sanctions can only be imposed if there is an element of abuse of authority, conflict of interest, or other fraudulent acts. This research emphasizes the need for a clear distinction between business risks and unlawful acts to prevent directors from being criminalized for business decisions made in good faith and in accordance with good corporate governance principles. These findings are expected to serve as a reference in formulating state-owned enterprise policies and promoting more proportionate law enforcement against directors.

The banking sector is a strategic pillar that supports national economic stability and relies heavily on public trust. To maintain this legitimacy, banks are required to implement Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which is not only a moral obligation but also a legal duty as regulated in several laws such as Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies and Law No. 21 of 2011 on the Financial Services Authority (OJK). This study aims to analyze the responsibility of OJK in managing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds based on the principles of Good Governance and to examine the role of banking institutions in maintaining public trust through transparent and accountable Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices. This research employs a normative juridical approach by reviewing relevant legislation, literature, and regulatory documents. The results show that OJK holds normative, institutional, and legal responsibilities in supervising Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) implementation to ensure compliance with the principles of transparency, accountability, independence, responsibility, and fairness. Meanwhile, banking institutions play a crucial role in ensuring that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) becomes an integral part of their sustainability strategy rather than a mere administrative formality. The application of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) has a positive impact on increasing public trust, as transparency and accountability in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) management strengthen the social legitimacy of banking institutions. Therefore, synergy between OJK and the banking sector in enhancing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) governance is the key to achieving an ethical and sustainable financial system.

The implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) is a crucial foundation for maintaining public trust in Indonesia’s Islamic banking sector. Yet, the effectiveness of GCG is often debated because formal practices tend to be technocratic and procedural, lacking deeper internalization of Sharia Ethical values. This study analyzes the application of GCG based on Sharia Ethics at Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI), with a case study at KCP Sawangan Sari Plaza. Using a qualitative approach and case study method, data were collected through source triangulation, including in-depth interviews with the Branch Operation and Service Manager (BOSM), customer service officers, and tellers. These interviews were supported by participatory observation and an examination of corporate documents. The findings reveal no significant discrepancy between formal GCG practices and Sharia Ethics at the research site. GCG principles such as Transparency, Accountability, Responsibility, and Fairness are consistently implemented and rooted in ethical values like Amanah (trustworthiness), Shidq (honesty), and ’Adl (justice). A key insight from this study is the shift in employee motivation from fear-based compliance toward value-based compliance. This shows that the integration of GCG and Sharia Ethics is strongly influenced by ethical leadership and the development of a spiritual work culture at the branch level.

Firm value reflects investors’ perception of a company’s success, which is generally measured through its stock price. To enhance firm value, companies are required to manage their operations with integrity, efficiency, and professionalism, while safeguarding stakeholders’ interests through the implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG). GCG establishes a framework governing the relationships among shareholders, management, creditors, and the government in relation to their respective rights and responsibilities. In addition to GCG, environmental performance also plays an important role in influencing firm value. Effective corporate management should therefore align with the three dimensions of the Triple Bottom Line framework: profit, people, and planet. This study aims to obtain empirical evidence on the effect of Good Corporate Governance implementation and environmental performance on firm value. The research was conducted on manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2021–2024 period. A total of 41 companies were selected as samples using the purposive sampling method. Data were collected from the official IDX website (www.idx.id) and the respective companies’ official websites. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. The results indicate that the independent board of commissioners, board of directors, and environmental performance have a positive and significant effect on firm value. However, the audit committee does not have a significant effect on firm value.

This study aims to determine the extent to which certain profitability ratios, such as ROA and ROE, influence bank health, moderating these variables using Good Corporate Governance reports. A quantitative approach is used in this study, and secondary data from previous years are required for testing, sourced from PT. BPR BKK Purwodadi's report data. These findings demonstrate that companies with high profitability have incentives to maintain bank health, as this reflects effective operational and managerial performance. Furthermore, organizations with good corporate governance (GCG) generally have greater resources and a robust organizational structure, providing them with more opportunities to maximize performance. This study is expected to provide new perspectives on bank health maintenance practices, particularly for business entities in the banking sector. Particularly in the strategically significant banking industry, the results of this study are crucial for authorities such as the Financial Services Authority (OJK) to understand the relationship between corporate profitability, good corporate governance (GCG), and bank health. This understanding helps in developing more appropriate policies to maintain economic stability and financial fairness. The emphasis on business entities in the regional government-owned banking sector (Perseroda) during 2020 to 2024, a dynamic period with economic fluctuations, banking policy transformations, and major geopolitical challenges, distinguishes this study.

Penelitian ini mengkaji dampak dari mandatory disclosure serta praktik Good Corporate Governance (GCG) terhadap kualtias audit pada perusahaan yang tergabung dalam indeks LQ-45 Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode 2022-2024. Analisis menggunakan metode regresi logistik biner dengan sampel sebanyak 78 perusahaan yang secara konsisten tercatat dan menyajikan laporan keuangan lengkap. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa GCG memberikan pengaruh positif yang signifikan terhadap kaultias audit, yang tercermin dari meningkatnya kemungkinan perusahaan diaudit oleh Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) tipe Big Four yang dikenal memiliki standar audit berkualitas tinggi. Di sisi lain, pengungkapan wajib tidak menunjukkan dampak signifikan terhadap kualitas audit. Temuan ini menggarisbawahi pentingnya penarapan tata kelola perusahaan yang baik sebagai mekanisme untuk emngurangi potensi konflik antara pemegang saham dan manajemen, yang pada akhirnya meningkatkan mutu audit. Oleh sebab itu, disarankan agar kerangka GCG diperkuat guna mendukung peningkatan kualitas audit, serta regulasi fokus pada pengembangan tata kelola perusahaan yang efektif dan transaparan

Good Corporate Governance (GCG) is a form of decision by placing the company to be more organized and structured, according on the principles of transparency, independence, responsibility, accountability, also fairness. This study goal to determine the effect of professionalism, internal control systems, also internal audits on the implementation of GCG. This study uses a quantitative research type. The population comprised of 156 individuals is the personnel of the Administration & Commercial Division, Engineering Division, and Operational Division at PT Angkasa Pura Indonesia, Supadio Airport Branch, which are involved in the implementation of GCG. Utilizing the Slovin formula and data collection techniques, the sampling technique is purposive and non-probability, with a total of 115 respondents receiving questionnaires. Validity, reliability, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression analysis, t-test, also coefficient of determination were used in this study to facilitate data processing, assisted by IBM SPSS version 25. The study findings indicate that professionalism, internal control systems, also internal audits on the implementation of GCG. Partially, the professionalism has a significant positive impact on the implementation of GCG, can be seen from the sig value 0.007 < 0.05, the internal control system has a significant positive impact on the implementation of GCG, can be seen from the sig value 0.000 < 0.05, and internal audit has a significant positive impact on the implementation of GCG, can be seen from the sig value 0.000 < 0.05.

Solid financial performance is a crucial foundation for companies to achieve long-term success. In the banking context, financial health assessments are essential, as they directly relate to the stability of the national financial system. Therefore, the Financial Services Authority (OJK) has established standards for evaluating bank soundness using the RGEC method, which includes four key aspects: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings, and Capital. This study aims to analyze the soundness level of PT Bank Central Asia Tbk (BCA) during the 2020–2024 period using the RGEC approach. The assessment is conducted by evaluating financial ratios such as Non-Performing Loan (NPL), Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Return on Assets (ROA), Net Interest Margin (NIM), and Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). The analysis results show that BCA achieved a "very healthy" rating (PK-1) in all RGEC aspects. This reflects BCA's ability to effectively manage risk, implement sound corporate governance principles, and maintain strong profitability and capital. These findings strengthen BCA's position as one of the best-performing banks in Indonesia and demonstrate the company's commitment to maintaining financial stability and customer trust.

This study aims to analyze the influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) principles on the financial performance of Koperasi Pemasaran Trangsan Manunggal Jaya, including transparency, accountability, responsibility, independence, and fairness. Data were collected through questionnaires, observations, and literature studies involving 46 respondents knowledgeable about GCG implementation within the cooperative. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression, t-test, F-test, and coefficient of determination (R²). The results show that transparency, accountability, and responsibility have a significant effect on financial performance, while independence and fairness do not. The regression model is statistically significant, with an R² value of 0.549, indicating that the independent variables explain 52.8% of the variation in financial performance, while the remaining 47.2% is influenced by other factors outside the model, such as work environment, company size, market competition, operational costs, and working capital

The concept of company value is critical for investors as it reflects the potential growth, profitability, and long-term sustainability of a business. Company value is a critical factor that guides investment decisions, as it embodies both tangible and intangible factors that contribute to the firm’s success. The factors that influence company value include Good Corporate Governance (GCG), which refers to the practices that ensure a company’s management is held accountable, transparent, and efficient. It also includes profitability metrics, such as Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE), which indicate how well a company is performing in generating profits from its assets and equity. This study aimed to analyze how GCG and profitability influence company value, specifically in the infrastructure sector of Indonesia, listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). By using multiple linear regression analysis with data collected from 8 companies between 2020 and 2024, the research uncovered some insightful findings. It was found that the presence of Independent Commissioners, as part of GCG, had a positive and significant effect on company value. This highlights the importance of having independent oversight to ensure that the company operates in the best interests of its shareholders. In contrast, Institutional Ownership had no significant impact on company value, which might suggest that larger institutional investors do not always influence the company’s strategic direction in a way that directly affects value. Additionally, profitability, as measured by ROA and ROE, had significant effects on company value. ROA negatively influenced company value, which may indicate that companies with higher assets do not always perform better in terms of profitability, possibly due to inefficiencies. However, ROE had a positive influence on company value, suggesting that companies that efficiently use equity to generate profits are viewed more favorably by investors.