Publication Search

The rapid development of Islamic banking in Indonesia faces significant challenges in maintaining liquidity and profitability amidst dynamic capital market conditions. The urgency of this study arises from the need to examine whether traditional financial ratios, such as the Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) and Return on Equity (ROE), play a decisive role in influencing investment decisions, which are proxied by the Price to Earning Ratio (PER). The main objective of this research is to empirically test the effect of liquidity and profitability, both partially and simultaneously, on investment decisions in Islamic commercial banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2021–2025 period. This study adopts an associative design with a quantitative approach, utilizing secondary data from financial reports obtained from the IDX, and analyzed using multiple linear regression on 68 observation samples. The findings reveal that neither liquidity nor profitability significantly influence investment decisions, either partially or simultaneously. These results suggest that investors in the Islamic banking sector tend to prioritize non-financial factors such as sharia compliance, governance, macroeconomic conditions, and ESG trends, rather than conventional financial indicators. In conclusion, this research extends the understanding of the limitations of Signaling Theory in the sharia context and recommends the development of a more holistic investment evaluation model. Future studies are encouraged to incorporate non-financial variables for a more comprehensive analysis.

Thisl study aims lto determine lthe health llevel of lPT. Bank lSyariah Indonesia (lBSI) Tbk inl 2021-2024. The assessmentl indicators usedl in lthis study lare Capital, lAsset Quality, lManagement, Earning, andl Liquidity lor abbreviated las CAMEL. Thel Camel methodl is one of the factors lthat greatly ldetermines the healthl of la bank. Thisl study wasl conducted withl a lquantitative descriptive lapproach, namely usingl secondary ldata obtained lfrom library sources such as academic journals, government publications and annual lfinancial reports published lon the lcompany's officiall website, lby analyzing lthe CAR, lNPF, PDN, lROA, ROE, lBOPO, NI, land FDR lratios. The resultsl of thel study lshowed that lthe CAR lratio for the 2021-2024 periodl was given the predicatel "very lhealthy". The lNPF ratio lfor the 2021-2023l period was given thel predicate "lhealthy", whilel in 2024 lit was lgiven the lpredicate "veryl healthy". lThe PDN ratiol for thel 2021-2024 period lwas given lthe predicate "quite lhealthy". The ROAl ratio lin 2021-2024 was givenl the lpredicate "very healthy". lThe ROE lratio in 2021-2024 lwas given lthe predicate "lhealthy". The BOPO ratio in 2021-2024 lwas given lthe predicate "veryl lhealthy". The lNI ratio lin 2021-2024 lwas given lthe predicate "lhealthy". The lFDR ratio lin 2021 was lgiven the lpredicate "very lhealthy". However, inl 2022-2024 itl decreased and was givenl the lpredicate "healthy". lThe findings show lthat based lon these lindicators, the performance of Bank Syariahl Indonesial lTbkl in 2021-2024 was on average in the "very healthy" category, which indicates goodl financial health laccording to lthe overall lassessment.

This study aims to analyze the financial performance differences of Bank Syariah Indonesia before and after the merger based on three key ratios: Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR), Operational Expenses to Operating Income (BOPO), and Return on Assets (ROA). A comparative quantitative approach was applied using financial statement data from the 2017–2024 period, analyzed with normality tests and paired sample t-tests. The normality test results indicate that all data are normally distributed. The paired sample t-test reveals no significant difference in the FDR ratio before and after the merger, while significant differences are found in BOPO and ROA. These findings indicate that the merger affected the efficiency and profitability of the bank, but not directly the effectiveness of fund distribution. The study implies that Bank Syariah Indonesia needs to strengthen operational efficiency and asset management post-merger. Future researchers are encouraged to include non-financial variables and apply qualitative approaches to gain more comprehensive insights.

The purpose of this research is to analyze the effect of financial ratios on financial distress in Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia. This study uses determinants financial distress that isDebt Ratio (DR), Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR), Non Performing Financing (NPF), Return On Equity (ROE), and Operating Expenses Operating Income (BOPO). The population of this study is all Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia. The sample taken is the quarterly financial reports of Islamic commercial banks for 9 periods, namely the 2016-2024 period using the purposive sampling and using panel data binary logistic regression testing techniques. Based on the research conducted, the results show that Debt Ratio (DR), Non Performing Financing (NPF), Return On Equity (ROE), and Operational Expenses Operating Income (BOPO) have an effect on financial distress. Whereas Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) has no effect on financial distress.

The objective of this study is to examine and compare the financial performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks in Indonesia during the 2019–2023 period. This research is motivated by the rapid growth of the Islamic banking industry; however, its market share remains relatively small compared to conventional banks. The study evaluates various financial ratio indicators, including Return on Assets (ROA), Net Interest Margin (NIM), Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), BOPO, Non-Performing Loans (NPL), and Non-Performing Financing (NPF), using a quantitative approach and comparative method. Data were collected from the annual financial reports of several major banks selected through purposive sampling. The results of the analysis indicate that conventional banks generally outperform in terms of profitability and operational efficiency, as reflected in the ROA and BOPO ratios. On the other hand, Islamic banks demonstrate more stable financing quality and liquidity, as indicated by relatively stable NPF and FDR ratios. These performance differences stem from the distinct operational principles of the two banking systems: interest-based operations for conventional banks and profit-sharing principles for Islamic banks. The study concludes that a more comprehensive evaluation method, integrating both sharia compliance and financial elements, is essential to provide a fair and accurate assessment of bank performance. The findings are expected to be valuable for regulators, academics, and industry practitioners in formulating policies that support a more inclusive and sustainable banking system.