Publication Search

The rapid growth of Indonesia’s digital economy has created opportunities while simultaneously increasing the risk of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. To address these issues, the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) introduced behavioral remedies as an alternative dispute settlement mechanism. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of behavioral remedies in cases of market control and abuse of dominant position. The research employs a doctrinal legal method. Effectiveness is assessed through two main indicators, namely the restoration of market conditions and the prevention of repeated violations. The findings show that this mechanism is generally effective in restoring competition and preventing recurrence, as demonstrated in several KPPU cases, including Case No. 04/KPPU-I/2024. However, its effectiveness remains conditional, as the mechanism is reactive, does not impose fines, and is monitored only for a relatively short period. Moreover, although KPPU Regulation No. 2 of 2023 regulates this mechanism, it does not provide sufficient legal explanation regarding the classification of articles that are permitted. Therefore, stronger monitoring and more detailed legal clarification are required to ensure the sustainable effectiveness of this mechanism in maintaining fair competition.

Legal protection for consumers is a crucial element in the legal relationship between business actors and the public, particularly in high-risk service sectors such as gas stove repair services. In practice, many consumers still experience losses due to negligence by service providers, whether caused by inadequate technical handling or insufficient information regarding the condition of the stove after repairs. This study aims to identify and analyze the forms of legal protection available to consumers who suffer losses as a result of such negligence, as well as to determine the types of legal liability that may be imposed on gas stove repair service providers. Using a normative legal research method, this study applies both legislative and conceptual approaches. The legislative approach examines relevant laws and regulations concerning consumer protection, while the conceptual approach analyzes legal principles and expert doctrines related to liability. The findings indicate that consumer protection is provided in two forms: preventive protection, which ensures product and service safety in accordance with Indonesian National Standards (SNI), and repressive protection, which is implemented through enforcement mechanisms such as claims for compensation or dispute resolution through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) or the courts. Business actors who commit negligence in providing repair services can be held legally responsible based on the principles of negligence or strict liability. To strengthen consumer protection, the study recommends the establishment of derivative regulations concerning technician certification, standardized repair service procedures, and integrated supervision of safety compliance within the gas stove repair service industry.

Indonesia is a country with a high level of labor-related issues, particularly in relation to the protection and fulfillment of workers’ rights. Common problems include termination of employment, unpaid wages, and inadequate severance payments. One such case is the bankruptcy petition filed against PT. Setiaji Mandiri, which serves as the focus of this study. The objective of this research is to analyze the legal considerations behind the Commercial Court’s decision to grant the bankruptcy request and its implications for labor rights. This study employs a normative juridical method by analyzing relevant legislation and court rulings, particularly referring to Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, and Law No. 2 of 2004 on Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement. The findings show that PT. Setiaji Mandiri had indeed made efforts to settle its financial obligations, but these efforts were deemed insufficient by the court, leading to the acceptance of the bankruptcy petition. However, a key issue that emerged was the absence of debt registration with the Industrial Relations Court (PHI), which is mandated by law in cases involving employment disputes. According to the prevailing labor laws, the PHI must first determine the amount of severance pay owed to employees, which can then be used as a reference in bankruptcy proceedings. The study concludes that there was a procedural oversight in the handling of labor claims in this bankruptcy case. It emphasizes the importance of adhering to legal mechanisms that protect workers’ rights and recommends stricter coordination between commercial and labor courts to prevent similar issues in the future.

Public policies in the fields of health, environment, and safety are increasingly subject to disputes through the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism. However, state efforts to protect the public often face claims from investors who consider themselves harmed. This situation carries serious consequences, as states not only bear high litigation costs but may also be required to pay significantly larger compensation if they lose the dispute. This gives rise to regulatory chill, a condition in which governments delay, weaken, or revoke regulations due to concerns over potential investment disputes. Even when some cases result in a state victory, the potential for regulatory chill remains significant, as investors do not need to win disputes to create regulatory uncertainty and pressure policymakers. This phenomenon can manifest in three forms precedential chill, anticipatory chill, and specific response chill, each affecting the policy-making process differently. Regulatory chill narrows the regulatory space, limits state capacity to protect public interests, and creates a deterrent effect on the implementation of new regulations. Using a normative juridical approach enriched with comparative case studies, this paper examines three primary sources of regulatory chill: the economic burden of arbitration and potential compensation, long-term commitments, and institutional limitations in meeting the standard of fair and equitable treatment.

International trade disputes are one of the main challenges in global economic relations. The role of the World Trade Organization (WTO) as a multilateral institution is crucial in providing a fair and efficient dispute settlement mechanism. This article discusses the process of resolving international trade disputes through the WTO, as well as its role and contribution in maintaining stability and fairness in global trade. With a structured dispute settlement mechanism in place, the WTO acts as a guardian of the rules in international trade, preventing larger conflicts and ensuring legal certainty for world trade actors.

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (“OIC”) seeks to enhance economic collaboration between its member states, as outlined in the OIC Charter. Its key efforts is the Agreement for Promotion, Protection and Guarantee of Investments among OIC Member States (“OIC Investment Agreement”), which provides safeguards for cross-border investments and outlines procedures for resolving disputes between investor-states. Article 17 of the Agreement allows for dispute resolution through conciliation or arbitration. However, the lack of a dedicated dispute resolution body and clear procedural mechanisms has led to uncertainty and differing interpretations, weakening its effectiveness. This article explores the OIC’s role in investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) under the Investment Agreement. It highlights the need for a more structured and permanent mechanism to ensure fair and consistent resolution of ISDS cases, in alignment with the objectives of the OIC Charter.

Consumer dispute resolution in Indonesia is an increasingly relevant issue, considering the high dynamics of transactions that occur in the goods and services sector, including in the property sector. Consumers, as the weaker party in business transactions, often face problems related to the quality of goods/services received, delays, unilateral cancellations, or even failure in property development. Therefore, resolving consumer disputes is very important and requires adequate legal protection. This type of research is normative juridical research. Normative research is literature research by examining theoretical approaches and concepts that examine consumer disputes. Normative juridical research is legal research that places law as a building system of norms. Problems arise when consumers in good faith have paid all Down Payment obligations, but the business actor actually takes a unilateral decision to cancel the apartment construction project. Consumers who have invested funds amounting to IDR 307,530,900 are trying to get a refund, but the business actor does not show responsiveness and good faith in the refund process. This situation finally forced consumers to take legal action by filing a lawsuit with BPSK Medan City on December 5 2022. This case is a clear example of the application of consumer protection and the importance of BPSK as an alternative for resolving disputes outside of court. This decision also reflects the principles of justice and legal certainty in consumer disputes, where agreed consumers can obtain their rights through an arbitration mechanism.

Settlement of banking disputes through BPSK in the protection of banking customers is a legal defect because it is the authority of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution for the Financial Services Sector, BPSK is more appropriate for consumer disputes within the scope of industry and trade. The formulation of the problem in this thesis is how is the legal regulation of consumer protection for banking institutions, how is the settlement of banking disputes through alternative institutions in customer protection, and how are the judges' legal considerations in the Supreme Court Decision of the Republic of Indonesia Number 253 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017. The research method used is descriptive analysis that leads to normative juridical legal research, namely research conducted by referring to legal norms, namely researching library materials or secondary materials. Secondary data by processing data from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that legal regulation of consumer protection for banking institutions is regulated in Law Number 21 of 2011 and Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) Number 1/POJK.07/2013 in conjunction with Number 1/POJK.07/2014. Settlement of banking disputes through alternative institutions in customer protection is settlement by Arbitration between bank customers and the banking sector is the authority of the Alternative Dispute Settlement Institution for the Financial Services Sector. The judge's legal considerations after carefully examining the memorandum of cassation dated December 7, 2016 and the counter memorandum of cassation dated December 28, 2016 are related to Judex Facti's considerations, in this case The Kisaran District Court is not wrong in applying the law because the a quo case is a breach of contract that originates from a credit agreement.

Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health brings significant changes in the handling of medical professional errors in Indonesia. This research aims to analyze the mechanism for the formation and authority of the Medical Dispute Settlement Council as well as the role of the state in Gustav Radbruch's legal perspective. The research method used is a normative juridical approach with descriptive analysis. The research results show that this law integrates various previous regulations, establishing a permanent or ad hoc assembly to uphold ethical standards and professionalism for health workers. The Assembly is tasked with handling complaints and alleged disciplinary violations before they enter the realm of criminal law, offering fairer and more efficient dispute resolution through a restorative and non-litigation approach. The role of the state is very important to guarantee justice, legal certainty and benefits, ensure that the assembly operates fairly and transparently, and provides fair legal protection for patients and medical personnel.

One tries to work anywhere with no hindrances and can compete with their rivals in the competitive environment of today's globalized world. The emergence of disputes is one of the things that often occurs in circumstances like this. Disputes are ingrained in human life. Disputes in everyday life can arise between business partners, family, friends, husband and wife, and so on. A forum whose task is to resolve disputes can be used as a means of dispute resolution. Courts are the official place to settle disputes, while private institutions offer arbitration. Alternative Dispute Settlement (ADR), or Alternative Dispute Settlement (APS) in Indonesian, is the term used to describe out-of-court dispute resolution.

Legal certainty can be reached by good and explicit principles in a legislation, as well as its application. Investment requires legal certainty as well. On April 26, 2007, the Investment Law No. 25 of 2007 was enacted. This legislation was enacted to replace Law No. 1 of 1967 on Foreign Investment and Law No. 6 of 1968 on Domestic Investment. There are eleven factors that serve as benchmarks for gauging a country's ease of doing business. One of the indications is related to the resolution of investment conflicts, or in this case, contract enforcement and bankruptcy proceedings. According to the Doing Business 2019 report, Indonesia ranks 73rd (seventy-three) in terms of ease of doing business. Indonesia's EoDB ranking remains distant from the aim of entering the world's top 40 (forty) ranks. This is due to the fact that, among other things, dispute resolution in Indonesia still has various issues, including basic regulations, the trial procedure, and decision implementation. Meanwhile, affordable, fast, and simple conflict resolution facilities are required in the corporate world (according to EoDB indications). The results of this descriptive analytical research utilizing a normative juridical approach reveal that there is no implementing regulation of Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment, which focuses on discussing investment disputes, therefore there is no strong legal certainty in investing in Indonesia. Furthermore, there are several issues concerning the resolution of bankruptcy cases, some of which stem from regulations, namely Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, some of which can result in certain interests, the length of the bankruptcy court process, and legal certainty following the bankruptcy decision. A breakthrough or update that can support EoDB is required, one of which can be done in the field of investment dispute resolution, particularly connected to contract enforcement and bankruptcy case settlement, by creating implementing regulations and updating associated regulations.

Abstract : Trademark is an important part on trading and business. Trademark right need to be protected. There are several mechanism of the dispute settlement, namely civil law mechanism, penal law mechanism, arbitration mechanism and dispute settlement alternative mechanism. Keywords: trademark right protection