Publication Search

The increase in population without the support of adequate waste management facilities, such as the availability of Temporary Shelters (TPS), has caused the people of Blitar Regency to have the habit of throwing rubbish carelessly in rivers or the habit of burning rubbish. This can cause various negative impacts on the environment and health. This research highlights the importance of the "Bacem Berseri" Waste Bank program to create public awareness in managing waste in a healthier and more sustainable way. The aim of this research is to analyze the implementation of collaborative governance in waste management in Bacem Village, Sutojayan District, Blitar Regency. The research method used was descriptive qualitative, data collection was carried out through in-depth interviews with stakeholders, including Environmental Service officials, village heads, administrators of the "Bacem Berseri" Waste Bank, and local residents. Data analysis techniques include data collection, data condensation, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of this research show that collaboration between parties, including government, society, NGOs and the private sector, can increase the effectiveness of waste management through collaborative governance mechanisms. Key findings include the importance of face-to-face dialogue, facilitative leadership, commitment to process, and shared understanding in increasing community participation and building trust. The Waste Bank system implemented has had a positive impact in reducing waste accumulation and providing financial benefits for residents. However, the challenge lies in efforts to increase public awareness in all RTs to participate actively.

This research aims to analyze the impact of collaborative governance models on public service delivery. Specifically, the study will examine how stakeholder-inclusive governance approaches can influence the effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of services provided by local governments. Collaborative governance involves the engagement of various stakeholders, including government agencies, non-governmental organizations, and the private sector, in the decision-making process to improve public service outcomes. This study posits that such inclusive approaches can enhance transparency, accountability, and responsiveness in public service delivery. Employing a qualitative case study methodology, data will be collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The selected case studies will encompass a diverse range of collaborative governance initiatives at the local level, providing a comprehensive understanding of different contexts and practices. By examining these cases, the research aims to identify the key factors that contribute to the success or failure of collaborative governance efforts. The analysis will focus on the impact of these initiatives on institutional capacity, such as the ability of local governments to mobilize resources, coordinate actions, and implement policies effectively. Furthermore, the study will evaluate the outcomes of these collaborative efforts in terms of service quality, accessibility, and user satisfaction. The findings are anticipated to offer valuable insights into the success factors and challenges associated with implementing collaborative governance models. These insights will be crucial for policymakers and practitioners seeking to enhance the performance of local governments in delivering improved public services. Ultimately, the research aims to contribute to the broader discourse on governance and public administration by highlighting the potential benefits and limitations of collaborative approaches in the public sector.