Publication Search

Companies often carry out this tax avoidance strategy in an effort to reduce the amount of tax they have to pay. There are two ways for businesses to lower the taxes they pay. In the first case, the business world can reduce the tax value by implementing tax avoidance while still complying with relevant tax laws. The second alternative is for business actors to reduce the tax value by carrying out tax avoidance activities that violate tax regulations. This research examines the relationship between business strategy, transfer pricing, and capital intenssity on tax avoidance moderated by corporate social responsbility. This research uses a qualitative descriptive research methodology. The data collection method in this research is literature study. The research results show that business strategy, transfer costs, and capital intent have an influence on tax avoidance. As well as business strategy, transfer costs and capital intentions can be mediated by CSR on tax avoidance.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of independent commissioners, capital intensity, and executive compensation on tax aggressiveness in moderating institutional ownership in property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2017-2021 period.This study uses a quantitative approach. The population in this study is 80 property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling. The criteria that have been set are obtained from 8 samples of Property and Real Estate companies. The type of data used in this research is secondary data. The method used in this research is panel data regression analysis.The results of this study indicate that the Independent Commissioner has a positive effect on Tax Aggressiveness. Capital Intensity has a negative effect on Tax Aggressiveness. Executive Compensation has no effect on Tax Aggressiveness. Ownership of the Memorandum of Institutional Relations on Tax Aggressiveness has a negative effect. Ownership of the Institutional Relationship between Capital Intensity and Tax Aggressiveness has a positive effect. Institutional Ownership cannot moderate the relationship between Executive Compensation and Tax Aggressiveness.    

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of Corporate Governance with the proxy of the Number of Board of Commissioners, Percentage of Independent Commissioners, Total Compensation of the Board of Commissioners and Directors, and Capital Intensity Ratio on Tax Management in Manufacturing Companies in the Consumer Goods Industry Sector for the period 2018-2021. The population of this study includes all manufacturing companies in the consumer goods industry sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2018-2021 period. The sampling technique used purposive sampling technique. Based on the predetermined criteria obtained 11 companies. The type of data used is secondary data obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange website. The analytical method used is panel data regression analysis. The results showed that Number of Board of Commissioners, Percentage of Independent Commissioners, and Total Compensation of the Board of Commissioners and Directors did not affect tax management. Capital Intensity Ratio has a positive effect on tax management and Number of Board of Commissioners, Percentage of Independent Commissioners, Total Compensation of Board of Commissioners and Directors, and Capital Intensity Ratio together have an effect on Tax Management.

This study aims to determine the effect of capital intensity and institutional ownership on tax avoidance with profitability as a moderating variable. This study uses a type of quantitative research using secondary data in the form of annual reports. In this study, the population is consumer goods industry companies listed on the IDX for the 2019-2022 period using a purposive sampling technique. Based on this technique, 31 companies were obtained with a span of 4 years of observation, so that 124 observation data were obtained. The data that has been obtained is then analyzed using the SPSS version 25 application. The results of this study indicate that capital intensity has no effect on tax avoidance and institutional ownership has a negative and significant effect on tax avoidance. Then profitability as a moderator is not able to moderate the effect between capital intensity on tax avoidance, while profitability is able to moderate the relationship between institutional ownership on tax avoidance. Suggestions for future researchers to be able to add other variables that affect tax avoidance and to be able to use other sector companies as objects of observation in order to be able to compare the results of one company's research with another.

Numerous businesses are capable of implementing a wide range of tax planning techniques. Tax avoidance, or legally lowering taxes, is one tax planning tactic. Tax avoidance strategies typically use loopholes in the tax code without breaking any of them. In addition, they use tax law gaps to perpetrate tax evasion. While this tax evasion tactic is legal, the corporation using it is still receiving funding from the state. In 2013, 832 foreign investment companies were suspected of engaging in tax fraud in Indonesia due to their five consecutive years of loss reporting and nonpayment of taxes. This study aims to investigate and evaluate the effects of capital intensity, profitability, leverage, and majority share ownership on tax evasion. The Current Effective Tax Ratio is used in this study to generate tax avoidance. Mining businesses that are listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2017–2021 make up the population and sample for this study. With 37 observational data points, 7 mining companies make up the research sample. A multiple linear regression model is the research methodology employed in this study. Version 22 of the IBM Statistical Package for Social Science was used to process the data for this study. The study's findings demonstrate that tax evasion is not much impacted by profitability or leverage. Conversely, capital intensity and majority share ownership have a detrimental impact on tax evasion.