Publication Search

The assessment rating of bank hlth is expected to evalute the prformance of the banking industry. Because bank healtiness represent good financial condition and good management. Risk-based Bank Rating (RBBR) method is used Bank Indonesia as a standard to appraise the rating of the bank health. This study to find out the sundeness level of bank in terms of the aspects of Risk profille, Good Corporate Govermance (GCG), Earnings, and Capital. This was an deskriptif analysis, with the object study is BPR Supra Artapersada Kc. Cibadak, PT. the data were collected through documentation and date analysis techniquen was an analysis of the soundness of bank using the Risk-Bases Bank Rating approach with an assesment converage including Non Ferforming loand, Loan to Deposit Rating, Good Corporate Governmence, Return on Assets, Operational costs on operating income, and Capital Adequacy Ratio factors. The resulth howed the condition of BPR Supra Artapersada Kc. Cibadak, PT. at “healthy criteria” with Non performing Loand of 1,8%, Loan to Deposit Rating of 85%, Maximum credit limit of 0,083%, Return on Assets of 0,034%, Operational costs on operating income of 0,070%, and Capital Adequacy Ratio of 41%..

This research aims to analysis the soundness level of banks using the RGEC method at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk in 2018-2021. The data studied is in the form of financial statements of PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk for 2018-2021. The data collection technique used is the documentation technique. The data analysis technique used is a qualitative descriptive analysis technique using the RGEC method. The results of this research show that Bank Mandiri for 2018-2021 is viewed from the aspect of risk profile with two ratios, namely the ratio of Non-Performing Loans for banks in a healthy condition and the ratio of Loan to Deposit Ratio for banks in a fairly healthy condition. Aspects of Good Corporate Governance get the title of very healthy. Earnings aspect with two ratios, namely the ratio of the bank's Return on Assets in a very healthy condition and the ratio of the bank's Net Interest Margin in a healthy condition. Aspects of Capital with the ratio of Capital Adequacy Ratio of the bank is in very healthy condition.      

This study aims to determine the comparison of the soundness level of PT.  Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk based on Bank Indonesia Regulation (PBI) No.13/1/PBI/2011 concerning Assessment of Commercial Bank Validity Level using RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Eaming and Capital). The period used in his research was 5 years, starting from 2018 to 2022. The type of research used is descriptive research kualitative. The data obtained is in the form of secondary data in the form of annual financial statements of PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.  This study used an assessment method based on the calculation of each variable. Risk Profile assessment uses Non Performing Loan (NPL) and Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) ratios. Good Corporate Governance uses the results of Self Assessment of GCG implementation that has been published by PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. Earnings valuation uses the ratio of Return On Asset (ROA) and Operating Expense Against Operating Income (BOPO).. Capital uses the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). The results of research and data analysis using RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital) methods can be concluded that PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk received a Composite Rating of 1 (PK-1) with the predicate "Very Healthy". This is evidenced by PT Bank Central Asia Tbk obtaining an average composite value of 97.33% and PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk of 94.00% for the past 5 years. So it is proven that PT Bank Central Asia has a higher performance than PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.