Publication Search

This study to analyze the effect of Non Performing Loan (NPL), Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), and Net Interest Margin (NIM) on Return on Assets (ROA) with Operating Expenses to Operating Income (BOPO) as an intervening variable at PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Perser) Tbk. This research employs a quantitative approach using secondary data obtained from the annual financial statements of Bank BRI for the period 2015-2024. The data analysis method used in this study is Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) based on Partial Least Squares (PLS), which allows the examination of both direct and indirect relationship among variables in the research model. The independent variables consist of NPL, CAR, and NIM, the intervening variable is BOPO and the dependent variable is ROA. The results indicate that NPL has a positive effect on BOPO, suggesting that higher credit risk leads to increased operational costs. CAR and NIM have a negative effect on BOPO, indicating that adequate capital and effective interest income management improve operational efficiency contributes to increased bank profitability. The findings also confirm that BOPO mediates the relationship between NPL, CAR, and NIM on ROA. This study is expected to contribute to the academic literature on banking financial management and provide practical insights for bank management in enhancing operational efficiency and sustainable profitability.

This study aims to analyze and evaluate the health level of PT Bank Mega Tbk during the 2016–2023 period using the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RGEC) method. This research employs a quantitative descriptive approach with an evaluative design. The data used are secondary data obtained from audited annual financial statements published by PT Bank Mega Tbk and the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The analytical method refers to regulatory provisions by Bank Indonesia and the Financial Services Authority, covering four assessment factors: Risk Profile (measured by Non-Performing Loan and Loan to Deposit Ratio), Good Corporate Governance (based on self-assessment reports), Earnings (measured by Return on Assets, Return on Equity, BOPO, and Net Interest Margin), and Capital (measured by Capital Adequacy Ratio). Each indicator is assessed according to regulatory criteria and integrated to determine the Composite Rating (PK). The results show that PT Bank Mega Tbk consistently achieved Composite Rating 1 (PK-1), categorized as “Very Healthy,” throughout the observation period. The Risk Profile, Capital, and most Earnings indicators demonstrate strong and stable performance, while Good Corporate Governance remains consistently in the “Healthy” category. However, the Return on Equity indicator shows relatively lower performance compared to other profitability ratios, indicating the need for more optimal utilization of equity. Overall, the findings confirm the bank’s strong financial resilience while highlighting managerial implications related to capital efficiency.

This study aims to examine the impact of credit risk, liquidity, and operational efficiency on the profitability of Regional Government Banks (BPD) in Indonesia, and to explore the moderating role of female commissioners on the relationship between credit risk and profitability. The research uses a quantitative approach with secondary data from 2020 to 2024, utilizing regression analysis. The findings indicate that liquidity (LDR) and operational efficiency (BOPO) have a significant positive impact on profitability (ROA), while credit risk (NPL) does not significantly affect profitability. The presence of female commissioners shows a negative effect in the direct model, but this becomes insignificant with moderation, suggesting that the influence of gender diversity in banking governance may differ depending on the context. The study contributes to the literature by highlighting the critical role of liquidity management and operational efficiency in enhancing profitability, and offers practical implications for improving governance and performance in Regional Government Bank.

Audit tenure, and financial distress in the audit report lag of companies in the property and real estate subsector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2022–2024 period. Operational efficiency is then measured using the BOPO ratio. Audit tenure is measured by assigning a score of 1 if the company’s auditor is consistent and adding +1 whenever each year continues and returning 0 if there is a replacement auditor. Financial distress is then calculated using the Grover model, and audit report lag is calculated based on the difference in days between the audit report date and the financial statements. Company size is measured by Ln (Total Assets). Furthermore, the method used in this study is quantitative with a purposive sampling technique analyzed using multiple linear regression and moderated regression analysis. Operational efficiency hazards have a positive and significant effect on audit report lag, meaning that in this case the BOPO ratio has a high probability of being related to delays in longer audit reports. Audit tenure does not have an effect on audit report lag. Furthermore, financial distress has a negative and significant effect, indicating that companies experiencing lower financial difficulties tend to have a shorter audit report lag. Company size strengthens the influence of operational efficiency on audit report lag. Company size also does not moderate the relationship between audit tenure and report lag. Company size weakens the effect of financial distress on audit report delays. These findings demonstrate the importance of maintaining timely audit reporting for investors in decision-making. This study contributes to the literature on auditors and future research.

Thisl study aims lto determine lthe health llevel of lPT. Bank lSyariah Indonesia (lBSI) Tbk inl 2021-2024. The assessmentl indicators usedl in lthis study lare Capital, lAsset Quality, lManagement, Earning, andl Liquidity lor abbreviated las CAMEL. Thel Camel methodl is one of the factors lthat greatly ldetermines the healthl of la bank. Thisl study wasl conducted withl a lquantitative descriptive lapproach, namely usingl secondary ldata obtained lfrom library sources such as academic journals, government publications and annual lfinancial reports published lon the lcompany's officiall website, lby analyzing lthe CAR, lNPF, PDN, lROA, ROE, lBOPO, NI, land FDR lratios. The resultsl of thel study lshowed that lthe CAR lratio for the 2021-2024 periodl was given the predicatel "very lhealthy". The lNPF ratio lfor the 2021-2023l period was given thel predicate "lhealthy", whilel in 2024 lit was lgiven the lpredicate "veryl healthy". lThe PDN ratiol for thel 2021-2024 period lwas given lthe predicate "quite lhealthy". The ROAl ratio lin 2021-2024 was givenl the lpredicate "very healthy". lThe ROE lratio in 2021-2024 lwas given lthe predicate "lhealthy". The BOPO ratio in 2021-2024 lwas given lthe predicate "veryl lhealthy". The lNI ratio lin 2021-2024 lwas given lthe predicate "lhealthy". The lFDR ratio lin 2021 was lgiven the lpredicate "very lhealthy". However, inl 2022-2024 itl decreased and was givenl the lpredicate "healthy". lThe findings show lthat based lon these lindicators, the performance of Bank Syariahl Indonesial lTbkl in 2021-2024 was on average in the "very healthy" category, which indicates goodl financial health laccording to lthe overall lassessment.

This study aims to analyze the financial performance differences of Bank Syariah Indonesia before and after the merger based on three key ratios: Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR), Operational Expenses to Operating Income (BOPO), and Return on Assets (ROA). A comparative quantitative approach was applied using financial statement data from the 2017–2024 period, analyzed with normality tests and paired sample t-tests. The normality test results indicate that all data are normally distributed. The paired sample t-test reveals no significant difference in the FDR ratio before and after the merger, while significant differences are found in BOPO and ROA. These findings indicate that the merger affected the efficiency and profitability of the bank, but not directly the effectiveness of fund distribution. The study implies that Bank Syariah Indonesia needs to strengthen operational efficiency and asset management post-merger. Future researchers are encouraged to include non-financial variables and apply qualitative approaches to gain more comprehensive insights.

This study aims to evaluate the soundness of PT Bank Panin Tbk during the 2014–2024 period using the RGEC method, which assesses four key dimensions: risk, governance, earnings, and capital. This research approach is quantitative and descriptive, utilizing secondary data sourced from annual reports, financial statements, and officially published corporate governance documents. Each component is analyzed using relevant indicators, such as the NPL ratio, LDR, PDN, ROA, ROE, BOPO, NIM, and CAR. The results indicate that PT Bank Panin Tbk's risk profile, as reflected in the NPL, PDN, and LDR ratios, is largely in the healthy category, demonstrating the bank's ability to effectively manage credit and liquidity risks. An evaluation of corporate governance, based on consistent self-assessment reports over ten years, also demonstrates the achievement of a healthy rating, reflecting the bank's commitment to maintaining the principles of transparency, accountability, and regulatory compliance. Regarding earnings, profit performance, as measured by ROA, ROE, BOPO, and NIM, shows stable and positive results, confirming the bank's ability to generate sustainable profits. Meanwhile, in terms of capital, the CAR ratio recorded excellent performance and was a dominant factor in maintaining capital resilience while meeting the capital adequacy standards set by regulators. These findings confirm that PT Bank Panin Tbk was in overall good health throughout the study period. The results of this study are expected to provide strategic input for bank management in maintaining positive performance and for regulators as material for evaluating banking policies.  

This study aims to examine the effect of financial technology, fee-based income, and BOPO on the profitability of Islamic banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2020–2024 period. The research is motivated by the rapid development of digital financial services and the importance of operational efficiency in enhancing the financial performance of Islamic banks. This research employs a quantitative approach with purposive sampling. The data were obtained from the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (www.idx.co.id) and the annual financial reports of Islamic banking institutions. The analysis technique used is multiple linear regression with the assistance of SPSS software. The results show that, partially, financial technology and fee-based income do not have a significant effect on profitability, while BOPO has a negative and significant effect. However, simultaneously, all three variables have a significant effect on profitability. Future studies are expected to include additional relevant variables and extend the observation period

This study aims to compare the financial performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks operating in Jambi Province during the 2021–2023 period. The approach used is comparative quantitative, with descriptive analysis and independent sample t-tests. Five key financial ratios were analyzed in this study: Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), Operating Expenses to Operating Income (BOPO), Net Interest Margin (NIM), and Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR). Data were obtained from the quarterly financial reports of each sample bank, thus reflecting actual financial performance on a periodic and ongoing basis. The analysis shows significant differences in three key financial ratios: ROA, ROE, and BOPO. Conventional banks demonstrate higher levels of profitability and operational efficiency than Islamic banks. High ROA and ROE values reflect the effectiveness of conventional banks in generating profits from their assets and capital. Furthermore, lower BOPO ratios in conventional banks indicate a better ability to control operating costs. In contrast, no significant differences were found in the NIM and LDR ratios, indicating equality between the two types of banks in generating interest margins and disbursing credit or financing to customers. This finding has important implications for the development of the Islamic banking sector to be more competitive, particularly in terms of efficiency and profitability. Islamic banks are expected to improve their asset and operational management strategies to increase competitiveness amidst the dual banking system in Indonesia. This research also contributes to regulators in formulating policies that support the growth of Islamic banks in the regions. For academics and practitioners, this study broadens understanding of the dynamics of local banking financial performance and serves as a reference for further research on the effectiveness of the dual banking system in the regional context.

This research focuses on analyzing the impact of fundamental financial ratios on stock prices in the banking sector, specifically examining PT. Bank Mandiri Tbk. The key financial ratios investigated include Return On Assets (ROA), Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), Non-Performing Loans (NPL), and the ratio of Operating Expenses to Operating Income (BOPO). The study employs a quantitative descriptive research method, utilizing secondary data sourced from annual reports spanning the period from 2014 to 2023. Multiple linear regression analysis is utilized as the primary analytical tool to address the research questions and hypotheses. The findings of the study reveal that the independent variables—ROA, LDR, NPL, and BOPO—significantly influence stock prices, both in isolation and collectively. This indicates that these financial ratios are critical indicators for investors and stakeholders when evaluating the performance and market value of banking institutions. The research highlights the importance of these financial metrics in shaping market perceptions and stock valuations, providing valuable insights for investors, financial analysts, and decision-makers in the banking industry. Furthermore, the study contributes to the existing body of knowledge regarding the relationship between financial performance indicators and stock market behavior. By emphasizing the correlation between these ratios and stock prices, the research underscores the necessity for stakeholders to monitor and analyze these key financial metrics to make informed investment decisions. Overall, the results affirm the relevance of fundamental financial ratios in assessing the financial health and competitive positioning of banks, particularly in the context of PT. Bank Mandiri Tbk. This analysis not only enriches the literature on banking finance but also serves as a practical guide for stakeholders aiming to optimize their investment strategies based on financial performance indicators.

This study aims to determine the effect of Credit Risk, Liquidity Risk, and Operational Efficiency on Financial Performance in the Conventional Banking Sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2019-2023. The research method used is quantitative using secondary data obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange, namely the annual financial reports of conventional banks. The sampling technique was carried out using the purposive sampling method. The analysis was carried out with credit risk using the Net Performing Loan (NPL) ratio, liquidity risk using the Loan to Deposits Ratio (LDR) ratio, operational efficiency using the Operating Expenses to Operating Income (BOPO) ratio and financial performance was measured using Return On Assets (ROA). The results of the study showed that partially the credit risk variable had a significant negative effect on financial performance, liquidity risk did not have a significant effect on financial performance, operational efficiency did not have a significant effect on financial performance. Simultaneously, credit risk, liquidity risk, operational efficiency had a significant effect on financial performance.

The purpose of this research is to analyze the effect of financial ratios on financial distress in Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia. This study uses determinants financial distress that isDebt Ratio (DR), Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR), Non Performing Financing (NPF), Return On Equity (ROE), and Operating Expenses Operating Income (BOPO). The population of this study is all Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia. The sample taken is the quarterly financial reports of Islamic commercial banks for 9 periods, namely the 2016-2024 period using the purposive sampling and using panel data binary logistic regression testing techniques. Based on the research conducted, the results show that Debt Ratio (DR), Non Performing Financing (NPF), Return On Equity (ROE), and Operational Expenses Operating Income (BOPO) have an effect on financial distress. Whereas Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) has no effect on financial distress.

The objective of this study is to examine and compare the financial performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks in Indonesia during the 2019–2023 period. This research is motivated by the rapid growth of the Islamic banking industry; however, its market share remains relatively small compared to conventional banks. The study evaluates various financial ratio indicators, including Return on Assets (ROA), Net Interest Margin (NIM), Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), BOPO, Non-Performing Loans (NPL), and Non-Performing Financing (NPF), using a quantitative approach and comparative method. Data were collected from the annual financial reports of several major banks selected through purposive sampling. The results of the analysis indicate that conventional banks generally outperform in terms of profitability and operational efficiency, as reflected in the ROA and BOPO ratios. On the other hand, Islamic banks demonstrate more stable financing quality and liquidity, as indicated by relatively stable NPF and FDR ratios. These performance differences stem from the distinct operational principles of the two banking systems: interest-based operations for conventional banks and profit-sharing principles for Islamic banks. The study concludes that a more comprehensive evaluation method, integrating both sharia compliance and financial elements, is essential to provide a fair and accurate assessment of bank performance. The findings are expected to be valuable for regulators, academics, and industry practitioners in formulating policies that support a more inclusive and sustainable banking system.

This research was made to examine the determinants of financial performance of banking companies in Indonesia. There are four independent variables (board of diversity, net interest margin, operational efficiency, and liquidity risk) and a moderating variable (firm size) have been analyzed in this research. Testing the interaction effect of firm size in explaining the influence of these four independent variables on banking financial performance is still very limited. This quantitative research was analyzed by using secondary data from audited annual reports of the company. The purposive sampling technique was used to choose the research’s samples during the observation periods (2018-2022) and obtained 200 observations (40 samples over 5 years of research). Panel data regression with the EViews program was used to test the eight hypotheses which was developed in this research. The results of the Chow test and Hausman test confirm the use of the Random Effect Model in the analysis. The findings from testing the interaction model show that firm size does not moderate the influence of board of diversity and net interest margin on financial performance, while for operational efficiency and liquidity risk variables, the firm size shows a pure moderating role for the both.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and study how Non-Performing Loan (NPL), Third Party Funds (TPF), Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), and Operating Costs to Operating Income (BOPO) affect credit distribution. Quantitative research uses secondary data from the financial statements of banking service companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2018–2022. A sample of 235 companies was collected through a purposive sampling method. Data was processed using the SPSS application. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to conduct this analysis. The results of the study showed that the Non-Performing Loan (NPL) Third Party Funds (TPF) variable with credit distribution did not have a significant positive impact. The Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) and Operating Costs to Operating Income (BOPO) variables had a significant negative impact on credit distribution, while the Loan To Deposit Ratio (LDR) variable had a significant positive impact.

This research aims to determine the influence of Islamic banking financial ratios in the form of Return on Assets (ROA) Ratio, Non Performing Financing (NPF) Ratio, Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) and Total Asset Turnover (TATO) on the Operational Cost-Operational Income Ratio (BOPO) at Sharia Commercial Banks in Indonesia.  This research uses a quantitative approach with sample data totaling 7 (seven) sharia commercial banks out of 13 (thirteen) sharia commercial bank populations registered with the Financial Services Authority. Research data uses secondary data for the annual period in the period 2010 - 2023. By using the ARDL (Autoreggressive Distributed Lag) panel model using the PMG (Pooled Mean Group) method, the research results show that in the panel, it turns out that the Leading Indicator is the effectiveness of the variable in controlling the BOPO Ratio at Sharia Commercial Banks in Indonesia is Return on Assets (ROA), where ROA significantly influences the BOPO Ratio at Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Bank Aceh Syariah, Bank Riau Kepri Syariah, Bank Jabar Banten Syariah, Bank Mega Syariah, and Bank NTB Syariah, with stable positions in the short and long term. Of the 7 (seven) Sharia Commercial Banks that are the objects of research, there are 4 (four) banks that are leading indicators of the effectiveness of sharia banking in influencing the stability of the BOPO ratio, namely: Bank Aceh Syariah, Bank Riau Kepri Syariah, Bank Jabar Banten Syariah, and Bank Mega Syariah through ROA, NPF, FDR, and TATO.  Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) is also capable of being a Leading Indicator of variable effectiveness to influence the BOPO Ratio at Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Bank Aceh Syariah, Bank Riau Kepri Syariah, Bank BCA Syariah, Bank Jabar Banten Syariah, Bank Mega Syariah, and Bank NTB Syariah, However, its position is unstable in the short and long term.

This study aims to examine the influence of the board of commissioners, board of directors, and internal audit on the company's competitiveness. Where, the company's competitiveness in question is ROA, CAR and BOPO. This study used purposive sampling with a sample size of 15 banking companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2021-2023. The results of this study indicate that the Board of Commissioners does not affect the company's competitiveness with ROA, BOPO and CAR indicators. The board of directors does not affect the company's competitiveness with ROA, BOPO, and CAR indicators. Internal Audit does not affect the company's competitiveness with ROA, BOPO, and CAR indicators. However, the Board of Commissioners, Board of Directors, and Internal Audit affect the company's competitiveness together with the BOPO indicator. This indicates that the Board of Commissioners, Board of Directors, and Internal Audit can increase the company's competitiveness together by streamlining its operational costs and operating income.

This study aims to use financial indicators to determine the effect of regional gross domestic product on the performance of Sharia BPR in Lampung. This survey method uses a quantitative descriptive survey whether the performance of the Lampung BPR SYARIAH will be influenced by Lampung's economic growth between January 2020 to December 2021. The population and sample are all BPR SYARIAH registered with the Financial Services Authority (OJK), and there are 11 BPR SYARIAH in the Lampung study area. So it can be said that the influence of KAP (X1) NPF (X2) ROA (X3) BOPO (X4) FDR (X5) CASH RATIO (X6) triggers the GRDP (Y). %, the remaining 1% is caused by other unavailable factors. The result of the f-test is known as the probability statistic F (0.017600). Because (0.05), it can be said that KAP, PAP, NPF, ROA, BOPO, FDR, and CASHRATIO together have a major influence on GRDP. And the partial significance test shows the value of Prob. KAP Ha1 was rejected because 0.05 < 0.0731, indicates a negative relationship, Prob value. NPF Ha2 is accepted because 0.0191 < 0.05 indicates a positive relationship, Prob value. ROA Ha3 is accepted because 0.0681 < 0.05 indicates a positive relationship, Prob value. BOPO Ha4 is rejected because 0.1055 < 0.05 indicates a negative relationship, Prob value. FDR Ha5 is accepted because 0.0398 < 0.05 indicates a positive relationship, Prob value. CASHRASIO Ha6 is accepted because 0.0235 < 0.05 indicates a positive relationship.

The development of the banking industry in Indonesia is highly regarded, making the presence of banking institutions essential. It is known that the banking industry plays a strategic role in supporting the implementation of national development to enhance equitable development. To become a sufficiently good bank, measuring performance as an indicator of success is an absolute requirement. This research aims to determine whether the Risk Based Bank Rating approach can measure Financial Performance and the Risk Based Bank Rating moderated by Capital Structure can measure Financial Performance. Case study of state-owned banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2019-2022. This research uses secondary data and research methods used is quantitative. The results show that Non-Performing Loans have a negative impact on financial performance, the Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) has a significant impact on Return On Assets (ROA), the Net Interest Margin (NIM) has a positive and significant impact on financial performance measured by Return On Assets (ROA). Operating Expenses to Operating Income (BOPO) has a negative and significant impact on financial performance measured by Return On Assets (ROA). The Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) has a significant impact on financial performance. Capital Structure has a significant impact on Non-Performing Loans (NPL) compared to financial performance. Capital Structure significantly affects the Net Interest Margin (NIM) concerning financial performance. The capital structure between operating expenses and operating income can influence a company's performance.    

This study aims to analyze and compare the financial performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks in Indonesia using library research methods. Data sources come from related literature such as scientific journals, articles, previous research reports, and relevant online sources. Bank financial performance is measured through several ratios including capital ratio (CAR), asset quality (NPL), liquidity (LDR), profitability (ROA and ROE), and efficiency (BOPO) which are calculated based on the bank's financial statements. The results of the analysis show that in general the financial performance of both types of banks is in a healthy condition and meets regulatory standards. However, there are differences in performance in several ratios individually. Conventional banks tend to have better performance in CAR, NPL, BOPO, and ROA ratios, indicating better capital quality, assets, operating costs, and profitability. Meanwhile, Islamic banks show better liquidity performance (LDR) and asset growth. However, the difference in performance is not yet fully statistically significant. In general, the financial performance of conventional banks is superior. However, the performance of Islamic banks also experienced an annual increase. To improve competitiveness, Islamic banks need to continue to make improvements, especially in terms of capital, cost management, credit quality, and increasing fee-based products. Both types of banks have developed and operated harmoniously without causing significant financial turmoil. The results of the study are expected to provide a stronger picture of the comparison of the financial performance of Islamic and conventional banks in Indonesia.