SciRepID - Scientific Publication Search

Publication Search

49,117 articles from 425 journals · 1,447 citations tracked

Showing 1-3 of 3

Analytics

Yoman Berchmans; Linus Evrianus Ama Kean; Reynaldo Behar; Yampi R. Kaesmetan

Populer: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa 2023 Universitas Maritim AMNI Semarang

This research aims to address the issues surrounding the allocation of employee benefits at TVRI Nusa Tenggara Timur. Currently, the decision-making process for benefits is solely based on recommendations from supervisors, without taking into consideration employee performance, potentially leading to social jealousy and suboptimal outcomes. In this study, we develop a Decision Support System (DSS) utilizing the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to assess employee performance. AHP allows for a hierarchical and objective breakdown of multi-factor problems. The criteria used for evaluation include attendance, behavior, length of service, and dependents. It is expected that the implementation of this DSS will enhance transparency and objectivity in decision-making, minimize employee dissatisfaction, and provide a more robust basis for benefit allocation decisions. This research offers practical contributions to human resource management and decision-making at TVRI Nusa Tenggara Timur.

Fadillah, Sahla; Andi Christian; Ariansyah

Jurnal Elektronika dan Komputer 2023 STEKOM PRESS

Achievement ability is a pinnacle of the learning process, at this stage students prove the success of learning at school SD Negeri 17 Gunung Megang. However, as the learning process progresses, several things occur that can affect this success. One of them is the problem of declining achievement scores, both academic and non-academic scores. The value of achievement that decreases or increases can be influenced by various factors. All problems need to be resolved so that the school can find a solution to increase or maintain the value of student achievement for the next period. Based on these problems, a Decision Support System is needed that can help the school in seeing the effect of student achievement. The method used in making decisions on the effect of student achievement is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. AHP can be compiled based on a hierarchical model that is made together with decision makers in order to provide solutions through the highest weight value in each criterion and alternative that is served. The decision support system with the AHP method can determine the priority weight of the criteria.

Senna Hendrian

Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer 2023 International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Increasing the productivity of an agency's performance is inseparable from the quality of human resources (HR) who are reliable, professional and have high integrity. Increasing the competence or expertise of HR can support an increase in employee performance. Managing employee performance effectively is one of the key factors to improve the company's business performance. In this case, effective performance management includes the process of measuring employee performance objectively through a series of appropriate performance indicators. The problems that have been the inhibiting factors are 1) the process of determining the best employees still uses conventional methods, so errors often occur in evaluating employee performance, 2) there is no system or method that can quickly, precisely and accurately determine the best employees at CV Diana Cosmetics Bandung, so as to produce reports that are more organized, so that they can be used as a reference for future elections. Implementation of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method for Determining the Best Employees at CV. Diana Cosmetics Bandung is the right method to use so that the final result can be obtained by multiplying the priority criteria value with the priority value of the sub criteria according to the Employee value data, for example the value "0.17" in the discipline column row A results from "0.41" ( obtained from the sufficient value of employee A, the priority of the sub criteria is sufficient on discipline) multiplied by the priority of the disciplinary criteria "0.42".