Publication Search

This study aims to determine the effect of green accounting, profitability, leverage, and company size on tax aggressiveness. The population in this study is energy sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the financial reporting period 2020-2024. The sampling technique used in this study is purposive sampling, and a sample of 35 companies was obtained. The analysis technique used is multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS version 22.0. The results of this study indicate that green accounting has a positive and significant effect on tax aggressiveness, profitability has a positive and significant effect on tax aggressiveness, leverage does not have a significant effect on tax aggressiveness, and company size does not have a significant effect on tax aggressiveness. The results show that green accounting and profitability have a positive and significant influence on tax aggressiveness, while leverage and firm size do not significantly influence tax aggressiveness. These findings provide insight that companies with a concern for environmental impacts tend to implement more aggressive tax policies, and that more profitable companies have an incentive to optimize their tax management.

This study aims to analyze the determinants of tax aggressiveness in construction, property, and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during 2021–2024. The sample consists of 80 companies with 220 observations, selected using purposive sampling based on criteria such as the availability of financial statements and the absence of losses during the research period. The variables include tax aggressiveness (ETR), profitability (ROA), leverage (DAR), board size, and firm size (SIZE). Data were analyzed using PLS-SEM with WarpPLS 8.0. The results show that profitability has a negative and significant effect on tax aggressiveness, while leverage has a positive and significant effect. Board size does not significantly affect tax aggressiveness but positively influences profitability and leverage. Firm size negatively affects profitability but positively impacts board size and leverage. These findings indicate that financial factors are more dominant in determining tax aggressiveness than board size, a corporate governance mechanism

Company value is an important indicator that reflects company performance and investor perceptions of future business prospects and sustainability. Various strategic decisions made by management, such as capital intensity management, investment decisions, and tax aggressiveness policies, play a significant role in shaping company value. This study aims to examine and analyze the effect of capital intensity, investment decisions, and tax aggressiveness on company value through a literature review approach. The method used is a literature review by examining various relevant national and international scientific articles obtained from academic databases such as Google Scholar, Publish or Perish, and SINTA. The results of the study show that capital intensity has a positive effect on company value because it reflects long-term production capacity and operational efficiency. Investment decisions have also been proven to have a positive effect on company value because they signal management's optimism about future growth prospects. Meanwhile, tax aggressiveness can increase company value through tax savings and increased cash flow, but it has the potential to cause reputational and governance risks if done excessively. Overall, the reviewed literature shows that these three variables have an impact on company value, with the caveat that optimal and transparent management is necessary. This study is expected to serve as a reference for further research and as a consideration for company management and investors in making strategic decisions.

This study aims to analyze the influence of Accounting Conservatism, Corporate Governance, and Financial Distress on Tax Aggressiveness in non-cyclical consumer sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period 2019 to 2023. This study uses a quantitative approach with secondary data in the form of annual financial reports of sample companies. Sampling was carried out using a purposive sampling technique, resulting in 14 companies that met the research criteria with a total of 70 observations over five years. The analysis method used is panel data regression, and testing was conducted using E-Views 12 software. The main objective of this study is to determine the extent to which conservatism practices in financial reporting, corporate governance, and the company's financial condition (in the context of financial distress) can influence the company's tendency to engage in tax aggressiveness, namely efforts to minimize the tax burden legally but aggressively. The results of the study indicate that simultaneously, the three independent variables—accounting conservatism, corporate governance, and financial distress—have a significant influence on tax aggressiveness. However, only corporate governance (as proxied by institutional ownership) and financial distress were found to have a significant influence on tax aggressiveness. In contrast, accounting conservatism and corporate governance, as proxied by managerial ownership, did not show a significant influence. These findings suggest that companies with high institutional ownership tend to be better able to control aggressive tax management practices, while financial distress encourages management to seek tax efficiency measures as a survival strategy. This research contributes to the interests of regulators and stakeholders in understanding the factors influencing tax aggressiveness in vital industrial sectors such as non-cyclical consumer goods.

The purpose study aims to analize the effect of the environmental social governance & tax agresivity with Role political connection as moderation variable. In this study the theory used as the basis for this test is Legistimachy theory & Political Cost Hypotesis theory, This study aims to examine the environmental, social and governance aspects of tax aggressiveness and to examine whether political connections can moderate environmental social governance on tax aggressiveness in manufacturing, mining, & agro companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX).. Sample measurements in this research were using quantitative techniques.  The objects used as samples in this test were 60 companies The type of data used as the research object is documentary, namely financial reports of companies by selecting the time period 2021 to 2023 respectively. This research uses outer model, inner model & hypothesis testing. The results show that each dimension of the environment social and governance does not have a direct effect on tax aggressiveness with a significance value of p value above 0.05 and t statistic shows a coefficient below 1.966. However, the indirect effect shows that political connections can act as a negative moderator of the relationship between the environment and tax aggressiveness with a significance value of p value 0.020 and t statistic 2.330. In addition, political connections can also act as a positive moderator of the relationship between governance and tax aggressiveness with a significance value of p value 0.004 and t statistic 2.906. However, political connections cannot moderate the relationship between the social environment and tax aggressiveness with a significance value of p value e 0.081 and t statistic 1.745.

This research aims to examine the influence of capital intensity, company size, and sales growth on tax aggressiveness. This research uses a quantitative approach and uses associative methods. The type of data used in this research is secondary data. The data analysis method used in this research is Panel Data Regression Analysis using the Eviews version 13 application and Microsoft Excel. The population used in this research is Energy Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) for the 2018-2023 period. The data collection technique in this research is a purposive sampling technique with a population of 87 companies becoming the final 10 company samples or 60 observation data processed in this research. The research results show that simultaneously capital intensity, company size and sales growth influence tax aggressiveness. Partially, capital intensity and sales growth have no effect on tax aggressiveness. Meanwhile, company size influences tax aggressiveness.

This research aims to analyze the influence of inventory intensity, institutional ownership and capital intensity on tax aggressiveness with independent commissioners as a moderating variable in basic industrial and chemical companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2019-2023. The research sample consisted of 24 companies with a total of 120 sample data. This research uses secondary data in the form of company financial reports. The sampling technique uses purposive sampling technique with certain criteria. The data analysis method uses panel data regression using Eviews 12th. The research results show that inventory intensity and institutional ownership have no influence on tax aggressiveness. Meanwhile, capital intensity has a positive effect on tax aggressiveness. Apart from that, independent commissioners are unable to moderate the influence of inventory intensity and institutional ownership on tax aggressiveness. However, independent commissioners are able to weaken the influence of capital intensity on tax aggressiveness.

The Influence of Independent Commissioners, Liquidity, and Leverage on Tax Aggressiveness in Manufacturing Companies in the Food and Beverage Industry Sector Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2020-2024 Period. This study aims to find out and provide empirical evidence regarding the Influence of Independent Commissioners, Liquidity, and Leverage on Company Tax Aggressiveness in Manufacturing Companies in the Food and Beverage Industry Sector Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2020-2024 period. The number of samples in the study were 21 companies with a total of 63 research data obtained using purposive sampling method based on predetermined criteria. The data used is secondary data in the form of audited annual financial reports for the 2020-2024 period taken from the website www.idx.co.id. The data analysis technique used is descriptive statistics, assumption test, multiple linear regression analysis test and hypothesis testing. Based on the results that have been obtained, it is found that the Independent Commissioner and Liquidity have no effect on Tax Aggressiveness and the Leverage variable has an effect on Tax Aggressiveness.

To be able to reduce corporate tax payments, it is necessary to conduct an evaluation of tax management. Companies can exercise tax aggressiveness to minimize their tax burden without going against existing government policies. This study aims to examine the influence of capital intensity and leverage on tax aggressiveness. The population of this study is companies in the consumer goods industry sector listed on the Indonesia stock exchange for the 2020-2023 period. In collecting samples using the purposive sampling method, then there were 108 samples obtained. The research data used is secondary data in the form of annual financial reports from sample companies. The data analysis methods are classical assumption tests and hypothesis tests.   The results showed that the capital intensity variable had a significant influence on tax aggressiveness, while the leverage variabel has an influence but not significantly on tax aggressiveness.

Tax aggressiveness is a company's effort to reduce the tax burden. The reduction in taxes was due to differences in interests between companies and the government. This study aims to determine the effect of return on asset, leverage, capital intensity, and company size on tax aggressiveness. This study uses agency theory. This theory relates to the relationship between principal and agent. This type of research is quantitative using secondary data sources in the form of annual financial reports through the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The population used in this study were property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2018-2022 as many as 53 companies. The sampling technique in this study used purposive sampling with 3 specified research criteria so that a sample size of 12 companies was obtained with 60 data obtained. The data analysis technique used was multiple linear regression analysis using the SPSS version 24 application program. The results of the study showed that partially leverage, capital intensity and company size had a significant effect on tax aggressiveness, while return on assets did not have a significant effect on tax aggressiveness. To get better results in subsequent research, the population can be expanded to include more samples and other variables such as liquidity and corporate social responsibility can be used

Tax aggressiveness refers to the behavior of managers to reduce the tax burden on the business for their own benefit, so that it can create conflict between shareholders and managers. This occurs as a result of managers perform tax aggression solely for short-term profits without thinking about the long-term advantages of the business that shareholders anticipated. The purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of capital intensity and return on assets (ROA) on corporation's aggressive taxation whose data comes from relevant journals in 2019-2024. Systematic Literature Review is the research methodology employed in this study (SLR) and a total of 50 articles published from 2019-2024 accredited in SINTA are systematically analyzed in this study. The study's conclusions are Capital Intensity has a favorable impact on tax aggression, this means that the higher the capital intensity of a company, the greater the tax burden aggressiveness executed by the business. While the Return on Assets (ROA) of the company is positive and significant effect on tax aggressiveness, which means the greater the business's ROA, the more aggressive they are towards taxes.

The aim of this research is to determine the effect of tax aggressiveness, profitability, leverage, and an independent board of commissioners on corporate social responsibility disclosure with company size as a moderating variable in infrastructure companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The period used in this research is 4 years, starting from 2018-2021. This study uses a quantitative approach. The population in this study were 67 infrastructure companies that were still listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling and a sample of 13 companies was obtained. The data analysis technique used is moderated regression analysis (MRA). The results of the research show that partially tax aggressiveness, company size has a positive effect on corporate social responsibility disclosure, profitability, leverage, an independent board of commissioners has no effect on corporate social responsibility disclosure, company size is able to moderate tax aggressiveness towards corporate social responsibility disclosure, and company size does not. able to moderate profitability, leverage, independent board of commissioners on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Simultaneously, tax aggressiveness, profitability, leverage, independent board of commissioners, and company size have a positive and significant effect on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The ability of the variables tax aggressiveness, profitability, leverage, board of commissioners and company size to explain Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure is 21% as shown by the large adjusted R square value. Meanwhile, the remaining 79% is influenced by other variables.

Companies perceive taxes as a burdensome expense, which can diminish potential profits. As corporate taxpayers, companies have a responsibility to pay taxes in accordance with applicable laws. Tax aggressiveness refers to tactics employed by companies to manage or manipulate the magnitude of the tax burden they must bear, aiming to reduce their actual tax obligations without violating the law. This research examines the relationship between ownership concentration, tax risk, and corporate risk on tax aggressiveness, with accrual earnings management as a moderation variable. Data analysis is conducted using descriptive statistics with a quantitative approach. The research findings indicate that ownership concentration, tax risk, and corporate risk positively influence tax aggressiveness. Additionally, accrual earnings management can weaken the impact of ownership concentration, tax risk, and corporate risk on tax aggressiveness.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of independent commissioners, capital intensity, and executive compensation on tax aggressiveness in moderating institutional ownership in property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2017-2021 period.This study uses a quantitative approach. The population in this study is 80 property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling. The criteria that have been set are obtained from 8 samples of Property and Real Estate companies. The type of data used in this research is secondary data. The method used in this research is panel data regression analysis.The results of this study indicate that the Independent Commissioner has a positive effect on Tax Aggressiveness. Capital Intensity has a negative effect on Tax Aggressiveness. Executive Compensation has no effect on Tax Aggressiveness. Ownership of the Memorandum of Institutional Relations on Tax Aggressiveness has a negative effect. Ownership of the Institutional Relationship between Capital Intensity and Tax Aggressiveness has a positive effect. Institutional Ownership cannot moderate the relationship between Executive Compensation and Tax Aggressiveness.    

This research was conducted to analyze the effect of Liquidity, Profitability, Leverage and Operating Costs on Tax Aggressiveness in Transportation and Logistics sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2011 – 2021. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling so that the number of samples used in the study were 15 companies. The data analysis method in this study uses panel data regression analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that Liquidity, Profitability and Leverage have a negative effect on Tax Aggressiveness. Meanwhile, operational costs have a positive influence on tax aggressiveness

This study aims to find empirical evidence about the effect of corporate governance on tax aggressiviness with the disclosure of corporate social responsibility as a moderating variable seen from the financial statements listed on the IDX. The sampel data is 193 annual financial reports in 2016-2020. The analysis was carried out using multiple linear regression analysis and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) with the SPSS version 21 program. Based on the results of data analysis and discussion conducted, it can be concluded that corporate governance has a positive effect on tax aggressiviness. Corporate social responsibility can weaken the negative influence of corporate governance on tax aggressiveness.

This study aims to analyze the effect of Funding Decisions, Dividend Policy and Tax Aggressiveness on Firm Value.Population in this study is the property and real estate sector companies listed on the IDX in 2015-2019. The sample companies obtained and meet the criteria are 9 companies and the data that can be processed is 45 annual report data. The data analysis used is descriptive statistics, classical assumption test, multiple linear regression, and hypothesis testing using SPSS version 21.0 program. The results of the partial test (t test), Funding Decisions have a significant positive effect on Firm Value, Dividend Policy has a significant positive effect on Firm Value, while Tax Aggressiveness has no effect on Firm Value.

This study aims to determine the effect of leverage, fixed asset intensity, and firm size on tax aggressiveness. The population in this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2017-2020 period. The sample of this research was taken using non-probability sampling method with purposive sampling technique and certain criteria. The method used in this research is panel data regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that leverage has a significant positive effect on tax aggressiveness, while the intensity of fixed assets has no effect on tax aggressiveness, and firm size has a significant positive effect on tax aggressiveness. The implications of the results of this study provide input to companies in making decisions to minimize the tax burden paid so that companies can be more aggressive towards taxes.

This study aimed to examine the tax aggressiveness through the components of financial ratios namely liquidity, leverage, profitability, and corporate size in manufacturing companies of consumer goods sub-impurities on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2015-2018. The selection of samples uses proposive sampling with the criteria of consumer goods subsector companies that report complete finances and companies earn profits. Based on these criteria, a sample of 98 observations was obtained. Analytical techniques use multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that liquidity negatively affects tax aggressiveness, leverage negatively affects tax aggressiveness, profitability positively affects tax aggressiveness, and corporate size negatively affects tax aggressiveness. Keywords:  Tax Aggressiveness, Liquidity, Leverage, Profitability, Size of Fir  

This study aims to examine the effect of liquidity, leverage, capital intensity on tax aggressiveness, and moderated by company size. This study conducted in manufacturing entities listed on the IDX (Indonesia Stock Exchange) over the period of 2017-2019. This study used 63 manufacturing companies and 181 samples. The method of analysis used in this research is multiple linear regression and moderated regression analysis(MRA) to prove the role of moderating variabel. The results show that Leverage had an effect on tax aggressivenes, whereas liquidity,capital intensity and firm size had no effect on tax aggressivenes. This study also prove that firm size weakens the relationship between leverageand tax aggressiveness, while firm size not proven as a moderating variable on the relationship between liquidity, capital intensity on tax aggressiveness. Keywords: liquidity, leverage, capital intensity, company size and tax aggressiveness