Publication Search

This study analyzes the legal protection of children as perpetrators of rape within Indonesia’s national legal system and Aceh’s Qanun Jinayat, focusing on the Syar’iyah Court’s decisions that often fail to confirm the fulfillment of children’s rights to education, rehabilitation, and reintegration. Although the principle of the best interests of the child requires comprehensive protection, the absence of clear implementing regulations has created uncertainty. Using a normative juridical method with legislative and case approaches, the research draws on secondary data enriched with primary data and qualitatively analyzed. The findings show that both national law and Qanun Jinayat emphasize child protection based on the best interests principle. National law mandates special procedures such as mentoring, closed hearings, psychological assessments, and diversion, while Qanun Jinayat, through Article 50, stipulates lighter and proportionate uqubat for children. These frameworks complement each other in ensuring education, psychological recovery, and social reintegration. However, several Syar’iyah Court decisions have not explicitly included recovery rights, resulting in ineffective protection and legal uncertainty. The study recommends that the Syar’iyah Court explicitly incorporate children’s rights to education, rehabilitation, and reintegration in its verdicts. Furthermore, the Aceh Government should issue Standard Operating Procedures or Governor’s Regulations to provide a clear legal basis for implementing child uqubat in line with the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.

This article provides a comprehensive examination of the application of the lex loci celebrationis principle in the execution of notarial deeds involving foreign legal subjects within the Indonesian legal system. The principle affirms that any authentic deed executed in Indonesia must comply with national legal requirements, regardless of the parties’ nationality or the existence of transnational legal relations. Through normative legal research employing statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case-study approaches, this article elucidates how the lex loci celebrationis principle interacts with private international law, particularly in relation to the legal capacity of foreign nationals, the use of foreign documents, and the limits of jurisdiction. The analysis reviews the Law on Notarial Office, the Indonesian Civil Code, population administration regulations, as well as doctrinal developments and jurisprudence pertaining to international legal acts. The findings indicate that although the substantive aspects of an agreement may refer to foreign law through lex voluntatis, the formal validity of a notarial deed remains entirely governed by Indonesian law. These findings underscore the need to enhance the competence of notaries in understanding the dynamics of private international law and highlight the importance of harmonizing national regulations with the principles of private international law to ensure legal certainty in cross-border transactions.

This research undertakes a comparative analysis of the concept of divorce within the frameworks of Islamic Family Law and Buddhist Ethics. Marriage, recognized as a profound bond of both physical and spiritual union, holds significant value in both religious traditions. However, contemporary social realities reveal a high incidence of divorce, prompting a critical examination of the legal and ethical mechanisms governing its dissolution. Within Islamic jurisprudence, divorce (talak) is permitted but considered detestable by Allah, governed by stringent procedural mechanisms including talak (the husband’s right), khulu’ or gugat cerai (the wife’s right to initiate), and fasakh (judicial intervention). These processes carry clear legal implications concerning the waiting period (iddah), the possibility of reconciliation (rujuk), and the division of marital property. Conversely, while Buddhism does not explicitly prohibit divorce, the teachings of the Buddha strongly encourage spouses to exhaust all avenues for peaceful conflict resolution before considering separation as a last resort. The ethical framework in Buddhism grants equal rights to both parties to dissolve the marriage. This study employs a qualitative descriptive analytical method through library research, drawing upon primary legal texts such as Indonesia’s Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) for Muslims, alongside the Vinaya Pitaka for adherents of Buddhism. The findings indicate that while both traditions view divorce as a final option, they diverge fundamentally in their legal structures; Islamic law establishes specific, gender-differentiated rights and obligations, whereas Buddhist ethics emphasize mutual consent and personal responsibility without formal legalistic procedures. The research concludes by recommending that couples, regardless of faith, prioritize reconciliation and peace, aligning with the core principles of both religions, and urges policymakers and legal practitioners to promote harmonious family life and reconsider legal frameworks that might better serve the welfare of children and families.

The development of information technology has produced a significant transformation in election administration mechanisms, including within the City of Palangka Raya. The digitalization of various services and information systems requires the General Elections Commission (KPU) to enhance transparency while simultaneously ensuring the security of voter data and election results. This study aims to examine the key challenges faced by the Palangka Raya KPU in balancing the need for information openness with data protection in the digital era. The research employs a qualitative descriptive method through literature review, direct observation, and structured interviews with KPU staff, election supervisors, and relevant stakeholders. The findings indicate that digitalization improves the effectiveness of public information dissemination, including through the use of Sidalih and Sirekap, yet it also introduces vulnerabilities such as potential voter data breaches, cyberattacks, and the spread of disinformation through social media. Moreover, limitations in human resources with technological expertise serve as constraints in optimizing digital security. Conversely, the implementation of data security standards and improvements in voter digital literacy contribute to strengthening public trust in the election process. Thus, the Palangka Raya KPU needs to reinforce cybersecurity infrastructure, enhance internal technical capacity, and broaden public education programs to safeguard electoral integrity amid increasing transparency demands and digital risks. Collaboration among government, academia, and the community is a strategic element in maintaining the quality of democracy in the digital era.

The agrarian conflict in the Kendeng Mountains, Central Java, arose due to the construction of a cement factory by PT Semen Indonesia, which was supported by the state through the issuance of environmental permits, even though several permits had been revoked by court decisions. The local community rejected the project because it threatened their water sources, environment, and livelihoods. This study aims to analyze the relationship between the state, corporations, and civil society in the agrarian conflict in Kendeng, as well as the role of civil society movements in responding to this conflict. The research uses qualitative methods with a literature study of journals and related news reports. Using Karl Marx's theory of conflict and Charles Tilly's theory of social movements, the study finds that the state tends to side with corporate interests, while civil society continues to build resistance through collective action, legal advocacy, public campaigns, and ecofeminist movements. The Kendeng conflict reflects the imbalance of power relations and the weakness of substantive democracy in natural resource management. The need for increased transparency in licensing, community participation, and ecological protection are the main solutions.

The rapid advancement of digital technology has fundamentally transformed civil legal interactions, making electronic documents such as instant messages, online transactions, and digital contracts primary forms of evidence in many civil disputes. However, their admissibility in judicial proceedings remains fraught with challenges concerning formal and material validity. This study aims to identify juridical and technical obstacles in digital evidence and to formulate an ideal model for civil procedural law that ensures reliable electronic proof. A normative-juridical approach with qualitative analysis was employed, combining doctrinal research through legislative review, jurisprudence, and scholarly literature with case studies of court decisions involving electronic evidence, particularly in divorce disputes. The findings reveal that inconsistent judicial treatment stems from the absence of specific procedural rules in Indonesia’s civil procedure framework still rooted in colonial-era HIR and RBg alongside limited digital infrastructure and low technological literacy among judicial actors. In response, the study proposes an integrated legal construction model featuring explicit provisions in the upcoming Civil Procedure Code, adoption of the functional equivalence principle, institutionalization of digital forensic experts in litigation, and procedural safeguards for vulnerable parties. The research concludes that only through holistic reform of the evidentiary paradigm can Indonesia’s civil justice system guarantee fairness, legal certainty, and relevance in the digital era.

The rapid advancement of digital technology has significantly transformed the economic landscape, particularly in payment systems that are shifting from conventional cash transactions to the use of Electronic Money (E-Money). E-Money has become increasingly popular due to the convenience it offers, allowing users to conduct transactions anytime and anywhere without the need to carry physical cash. As this payment innovation continues to expand, it is essential to examine whether its mechanisms comply with Islamic principles, given that the use of E-Money is closely related to the values of muamalah in Islam. This study aims to identify the underlying contractual structure (akad) governing Mandiri E-Money transactions and to assess its conformity with sharia principles. It further analyzes the potential presence of gharar, riba, or maisir within the top-up and transaction processes, as well as the sharia mitigation mechanisms that may be applied. The research employs a normative approach based on classical and contemporary Islamic legal theory, supported by observational analysis of Mandiri E-Money practices. Data were analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive method and maqashid al-shariah reasoning. The findings indicate that the use of Mandiri E-Money does not involve elements of riba, gharar, or maisir, and therefore does not deviate from sharia principles. These potential risks were examined through fiqh legal maxims and DSN-MUI fatwas to ensure comprehensive sharia compliance.

This community service activity aims to improve the efficiency of inventory management at Zencha MSMEs through the design and implementation of a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and a spreadsheet-based inventory recording system. Prior to this program, Zencha MSMEs managed its inventory manually without written procedures, which often caused stock discrepancies, delays in restocking, and difficulties in monitoring raw material availability. The methods used in this activity included observation, interviews, SOP design, system socialization, and direct implementation assistance. The SOP was structured to regulate the process of receiving, recording, storing, and using raw materials, while the spreadsheet template functioned as a digital tool to record stock movements automatically. The results show that after the implementation, inventory management became more organized, transparent, and measurable. The business owner was able to monitor stock levels more accurately, determine restocking time more effectively, and reduce the risk of stock shortages. In addition, employees demonstrated better discipline in recording inventory according to established procedures. This program proves that the implementation of SOP and digital-based inventory recording can significantly improve operational efficiency and support the sustainability of micro and small enterprises.

Penelitian ini menganalisis dasar hukum dan tanggung jawab notaris dalam tindak pidana pemalsuan akta otentik berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN). Notaris memiliki kewenangan membuat akta otentik yang berkekuatan hukum sempurna, namun hal ini juga menciptakan celah bagi pemalsuan yang merugikan. Pemalsuan akta termasuk tindak pidana pemalsuan surat, menimbulkan kompleksitas dalam menentukan batas tanggung jawab notaris karena kewajiban verifikasi notaris yang terbatas dalam investigasi materiil, serta adanya perbedaan pendekatan antara KUHP dan UUJN. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan statute dan conceptual, mengkaji peraturan dan literatur hukum. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa notaris dapat dikenakan sanksi pidana jika terbukti sengaja terlibat dalam pemalsuan. Kesimpulannya, diperlukan harmonisasi antara KUHP dan UUJN untuk memastikan kepastian hukum bagi notaris dan masyarakat, dengan penekanan pada pembuktian unsur kesengajaan (dolus) notaris.

Dalam pelaksanaannya, jaminan fidusia bisa dieksekusi dengan menggunakan sertifikat jaminan yang memiliki kekuatan hukum setara dengan putusan pengadilan yang sudah bersifat tetap dan mengikat. Namun dalam penerapannya, hal ini menimbulkan polemik karena adanya ketimpangan hukum, hingga terbitlah Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Penulisan ini membahas mengenai pengaturan kekuatan eksekutorial Pasal 15 ayat (2) dan (3) UU Jaminan Fidusia, baik sebelum maupun sesudah terbitnya Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019, dan implikasinya dengan menggunakan metode hukum normatif yang berlandaskan studi kepustakaan dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus. Hasil yang didapatkan adalah parate eksekusi yang dijalankan cenderung melanggar prinsip due process of law, sehingga terjadi pergeseran paradigma dari sistem eksekusi yang absolut menuju sistem eksekusi yang berkeadilan dan sejalan dengan prinsip negara hukum yang menjamin kepastian serta perlindungan hak konstitusional para pihak. Pergeseran tersebut menjadikan pembagian hak dan kewajiban antara debitur dan kreditur menjadi lebih adil, transparan, dan sesuai dengan prinsip keadilan substantif.

Penelitian ini membahas secara mendalam mengenai perlindungan hukum bagi nasabah dalam sengketa gadai syariah, khususnya yang berkaitan dengan pengembalian barang jaminan setelah pelunasan utang. Perkembangan industri gadai syariah di Indonesia yang sangat pesat menunjukkan adanya peningkatan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap lembaga keuangan berbasis syariah. Namun, di sisi lain, dinamika ini juga memunculkan tantangan baru dalam aspek perlindungan konsumen, terutama ketika terjadi wanprestasi, kesalahan administrasi, atau kelalaian lembaga gadai dalam menjaga serta mengembalikan barang jaminan milik nasabah. Melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif dan studi kasus terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Banjarmasin Nomor 1112/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Bjm, penelitian ini berupaya menganalisis bentuk tanggung jawab hukum lembaga gadai serta perlindungan yang seharusnya diterima oleh nasabah sebagai pihak yang dirugikan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa dalam perspektif hukum syariah, barang gadai (marhun) memiliki kedudukan hukum sebagai amanah yang wajib dijaga dengan penuh tanggung jawab oleh pihak penerima gadai (murtahin). Apabila lembaga gadai lalai dalam menjaga atau gagal mengembalikan barang tersebut, maka tindakan tersebut dapat dikategorikan sebagai wanprestasi sekaligus pelanggaran terhadap prinsip keadilan dan hak-hak konsumen. Perlindungan hukum terhadap nasabah diatur dalam berbagai peraturan, antara lain Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata), Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, serta pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) terhadap lembaga keuangan syariah. Namun demikian, efektivitas implementasi peraturan tersebut masih menghadapi berbagai kendala, seperti lemahnya pengawasan, kurangnya pemahaman masyarakat mengenai hak-haknya, serta minimnya mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang cepat dan transparan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan sistem pengawasan serta edukasi hukum bagi masyarakat agar prinsip keadilan, kepastian hukum, dan kemaslahatan dalam transaksi gadai syariah dapat terwujud secara menyeluruh.

Tanah adalah objek vital yang bernilai tinggi sehingga transaksi jual beli tanah menuntut kepastian hukum agar tidak menciptakan sengketa. Namun, praktik membeli atau menjual tanah secara tunai tanpa melalui PPAT dan tanpa memiliki sertifikat kepemilikan masih banyak terjadi, sehingga menimbulkan berbagai masalah terkait keabsahan dokumen, perlindungan hukum, serta risiko terjadinya sengketa. Latar belakang inilah yang melandasi penelitian dengan judul Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pembeli atas Tanah dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli: Studi Putusan Nomor 1990/K/PDT/2025. Penelitian ini ditulis guna menganalisis kekuatan hukum perjanjian jual beli tanah di bawah tangan dan menilai pertimbangan hakim dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pembeli. Metode penelitian yakni yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasilnya ditemukan dalam Putusan Nomor 1990/K/PDT/2025, perjanjian yang telah dibuat oleh para pihak terkait jual beli tanah adalah sah dan bersifat mengikat. Para Tergugat dinyatakan wanprestasi atas mengurus penerbitan sertifikat pengganti maupun proses peralihan hak atas tanah. Selain itu, Majelis Hakim memerintahkan agar sertifikat pengganti segera diterbitkan, dilakukan pemecahan bidang tanah, dan dilaksanakan proses balik nama. Untuk menjamin kepastian pelaksanaan putusan, hakim memberikan kewenangan kepada pembeli untuk mengurus sendiri seluruh proses tersebut apabila penjual tetap lalai. Pertimbangan hukum ini mencerminkan sikap hakim yang berorientasi pada perlindungan hak pembeli beritikad baik sekaligus sebagai upaya menegakkan prinsip kepastian hukum dan rasa keadilan.

Perjanjian kredit antara lembaga perbankan dan pelaku usaha mikro, kecil, dan menengah (UMKM) merupakan instrumen penting dalam mendukung pertumbuhan ekonomi. Namun, dalam praktiknya, tidak jarang terjadi wanprestasi dari pihak debitur  yang  berdampak  pada  hubungan  hukum  dan keberlangsungan  usaha.  Penelitian  ini  bertujuan  untuk mengkaji: 1) bagaimana proses pengajuan dan pelaksanaan perjanjian kredit antara Bank BRI dan UMKM Konveksi Parasit di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta; 2) apa saja faktor yang menyebabkan terjadinya wanprestasi oleh debitur; dan 3) bagaimana mekanisme penyelesaian wanprestasi yang dilakukan oleh pihak bank. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif yang didukung oleh data primer. Spesifikasi penelitian bersifat deskriptif analitis dengan jenis dan sumber data berupa data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi pustaka, serta data primer yang diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan pihak terkait. Teknik analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif untuk menginterpretasikan norma hukum dan fakta empiris secara sistematis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) proses pengajuan kredit dilakukan melalui prosedur formal dengan dokumen pendukung yang sah, dan dituangkan dalam Surat Pengakuan Hutang; 2) wanprestasi terjadi karena kombinasi faktor internal seperti pengelolaan usaha yang kurang optimal dan faktor eksternal seperti penurunan permintaan pasar; dan 3) penyelesaian wanprestasi dilakukan melalui eksekusi agunan, pelaporan ke otoritas keuangan, serta pendekatan persuasif seperti restrukturisasi kredit. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya edukasi hukum bagi pelaku UMKM dan penerapan prinsip keadilan dalam penyelesaian sengketa kredit.

Penelitian ini membahas peran dan tanggung jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dalam pembuatan akta hibah, dengan fokus pada implikasi sengketa hukum yang terlihat pada Putusan Nomor 1316/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Jepr. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah tingginya jumlah sengketa terkait akta hibah di Indonesia yang menunjukkan belum optimalnya peran Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dalam menjamin keabsahan dan legalitas dokumen. Kondisi ini menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai bagaimana regulasi mengatur peran dan tanggung jawab PPAT dalam pembuatan akta hibah, serta bagaimana permasalahan hukum yang muncul dipertimbangkan oleh hakim dalam memutus perkara sengketa akta hibah tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, dengan pengumpulan data melalui studi dokumen, wawancara, dan literatur hukum. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa tanggung jawab utama PPAT dalam pembuatan akta hibah mencakup syarat formil dan materiil sesuai PP No. 37/1998, KUH Perdata, dan KHI, termasuk verifikasi dokumen, identitas, status tanah, serta persetujuan ahli waris. Sengketa  dalam Putusan No. 1316/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Jepr, timbul akibat dugaan hibah fiktif dan kurangnya kehati-hatian PPAT, namun penggugat PPAT tidak dapat dibuktikan dan akta hibah secara administratif telah memenui syarat.Hakim menyatakan gugatan tidak diterima karena cacat formil Penelitian ini menyarankan agar PPAT lebih berhati-hati dalam menjalankan tugasnya dan lebih proaktif dalam mencegah potensi sengketa hukum terkait hibah tanah.

Aktivitas ekonomi mempunyai hubungan yang erat dengan transaksi antara entitas ekonomi, yang terkadang menyebabkan sengketa. Dalam konteks ekonomi syariah, sengketa muncul karena perselisihan antara pelaku ekonomi yang berbisnis berdasarkan hukum ekonomi syariah terkait hak atau kepentingan. Sengketa ini bisa diputus dengan instrumen hukum yang berbagai, baik litigasi di pengadilan agama maupun metode non-litigasi seperti negosiasi, mediasi, dan konsiliasi. Penyelesaian sengketa di pengadilan agama bertujuan agar terjaminlah keadilan dan keteguhan hukum sesuai prinsip syariah. Namun, dengan semakin meningkatnya tuntutan keadilan, penyelesaian sengketa melalui pengadilan relatif lama dan kurang efektif, maka alternatif penyelesaian di luar pengadilan semakin relevan. Negosiasi sebagai salah satu proses tawar-menawar dalam sengketa ekonomi syariah sangat memfokuskan pada persiapan dan komunikasi efektif kedua belah pihak. Salah satu penyebab sengketa ekonomi pada ekonomi syariah adalah wanprestasi dalam transaksi jual beli, terutama transaksi tanah. Oleh karena itu, regulasi ekonomi syariah yang mengatur prinsip keadilan dan keseimbangan hak dan kewajiban sangatlah perlu untuk menyelesaikan sengketa tersebut secara adil dan damai. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggali penerapan regulasi ekonomi syariah dalam penyelesaian sengketa wanprestasi, khususnya yang berhubungan dengan sengketa tanah, dengan mengidentifikasi metode penyelesaian sengketa yang sesuai dalam hukum Islam dan hukum positif Indonesia. Penelitian ini diharapkan memberikan wawasan mengenai relevansi dan penerapan hukum Islam dalam menyelesaikan sengketa ekonomi syariah, serta menyoroti pentingnya penyelesaian sengketa melalui metode yang mengedepankan keadilan dan perdamaian.

Informed consent constitutes a fundamental legal and ethical requirement in healthcare services, ensuring that every medical action is performed with the patient’s full awareness and voluntary approval. In Indonesia, the obligation to obtain informed consent is firmly regulated under the Health Law No. 17 of 2023, the Minister of Health Regulation on Medical Consent, and provisions on medical records. This paper examines the essential role of informed consent as a protective instrument for both patients and healthcare providers within the clinical and legal framework. Informed consent guarantees patients’ rights to information, autonomy, and decision-making, while providing legal safeguards for medical practitioners by documenting the process of explanation, acceptance, or refusal of medical treatment. Proper documentation within medical records ensures accountability, continuity of care, and serves as crucial evidence when medical disputes arise. Medical disputes often stem from dissatisfaction, communication gaps, or misunderstandings about risks inherent in medical procedures. Therefore, informed consent functions not merely as an administrative requirement but as a mechanism for preventing conflict, clarifying responsibilities, and distinguishing unavoidable medical risks from professional negligence. By strengthening the implementation of informed consent, healthcare providers can enhance transparency, improve service quality, and reduce the likelihood of medical litigation.  

Constitutional Court (MK) “Decision Number 60/PUU-XXII/2024 marks an important shift in the practice of judicial review, whereby the Constitutional Court not only invalidates legal norms, but also establishes new substantive norms in cases involving open legal policy. This action reflects the tendency of positive legislature, which theoretically expands the scope of judicial authority beyond the limits of negative legislature. This study aims to analyse the implications of this ruling on the legislative function of Indonesia Parliament (DPR), particularly in the context of its constitutional responsibility to respond to and accommodate new norms established through court rulings. Using normative legal research methods and a conceptual approach, this study finds that the DPR's suboptimal institutional response to the substance of the ruling indicates serious challenges in harmonising the constitutional system that guarantees the effectiveness of norms, legal certainty, and the principle of checks and balances. This study contributes to proposing a model of inter-institutional coordination or parameters for the judicialisation of norms to ensure the balance of power, as well as criticising and clarifying the boundaries of the roles of each state institution in the context of corrective legislation based on judicial decisions.

The banking sector is a strategic pillar that supports national economic stability and relies heavily on public trust. To maintain this legitimacy, banks are required to implement Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which is not only a moral obligation but also a legal duty as regulated in several laws such as Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies and Law No. 21 of 2011 on the Financial Services Authority (OJK). This study aims to analyze the responsibility of OJK in managing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds based on the principles of Good Governance and to examine the role of banking institutions in maintaining public trust through transparent and accountable Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices. This research employs a normative juridical approach by reviewing relevant legislation, literature, and regulatory documents. The results show that OJK holds normative, institutional, and legal responsibilities in supervising Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) implementation to ensure compliance with the principles of transparency, accountability, independence, responsibility, and fairness. Meanwhile, banking institutions play a crucial role in ensuring that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) becomes an integral part of their sustainability strategy rather than a mere administrative formality. The application of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) has a positive impact on increasing public trust, as transparency and accountability in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) management strengthen the social legitimacy of banking institutions. Therefore, synergy between OJK and the banking sector in enhancing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) governance is the key to achieving an ethical and sustainable financial system.

The management of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the banking sector holds strategic importance in strengthening public trust, supporting sustainable development, and ensuring that the distribution of CSR funds aligns with principles of good governance. However, CSR implementation among Indonesian banks continues to face fundamental issues, including limited transparency, inconsistent reporting standards, and weak supervisory mechanisms. This study aims to analyze the synergy between the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and the banking industry in establishing transparent and accountable CSR fund management. Using a normative legal approach combined with institutional analysis, the findings reveal that although OJK has issued sustainable finance regulations such as POJK No. 51/POJK.03/2017, these regulations have not fully ensured the integrity and accountability of CSR distribution. Strengthening reporting standards, ensuring independent audits, and integrating a digital CSR reporting system are essential to enhance oversight. This study proposes a regulatory–institutional synergy model between OJK and the banking sector to build CSR governance that is transparent, participatory, and impact-oriented.  

Islamic boarding schools play a strategic role in national development, not only as religious educational institutions, but also as agents of social and economic empowerment for the people. Law No. 18 of 2019 strengthens their position in the national legal system, in line with the values of Pancasila, which emphasizes social justice and respect for diversity. This study aims to analyze the position of Islamic boarding schools within the national legal framework, emphasizing the relevance of Pancasila and their contribution to strengthening the economy of the Muslim community. The method used is a qualitative approach with normative-legal literature study and qualitative analysis of regulations, literature, and practices of economic empowerment in Islamic boarding schools. The results of the study show that Islamic boarding schools have legal legitimacy as independent institutions in education, da'wah, and community empowerment, while also playing a role in developing cooperatives, micro-enterprises, and santri-based entrepreneurship. Thus, Islamic boarding schools have proven to be important actors in strengthening the economy of the Muslim community and implementing the Pancasila value of social justice.