Publication Search

AbstractThis research has purposes of knowing the interpretation of the supplementary worker rights definition after Constitutional Court Decision Number 67/PUU/XI/2013. This research has also purposes of knowing the preventive legal protection of the supplementary worker rights after the Decision of Constitutional Court No. 67/PUU-XI/2013. The results of this research are, firstly, the supplementary rights of worker are classified into: (a) normative, meaning that the supplementary rights which are provided and regulated by acts, such as severance payment, gratuity and compensative payment. (b) non-normative rights, meaning other rights are provided and regulated by the parties in accordance with the agreement in the employment agreement or collective labor agreement. Secondly, there are already legal protection of supplementary non-salary rights in Decision of Constitutional Court No. 67/PUU-XI/2013 but they are not completely protective because the supplementary rights of the worker are not included in separatist creditor payment.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui, penafsiran definisi hak-hak lainnya dari pekerja/buruh Pasca putusan Mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 67/PUUXI/2013. Penelitian ini juga untuk mengetahui, perlindungan hukum preventif terhadap hak-hak lainnya dari pekerja/buruh Pasca putusan Mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 67/PUUXI/2013. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pertama, hak-hak lainnya pekerja/buruh dibagi menjadi: (a). bersifat normatif, adalah hak-hak lain yang diberikan dan diatur oleh Undangundang, misalnya uang Pesangon, uang penghargaan masa kerja, uang penggantian hak dan (b). Hak hak lainnya yang tidak bersifat normatif, berarti diberikan dan diatur oleh para pihak menurut kesepakatan baik dalam Perjanjian Kerja (PK) atau Perjanjian Kerja Bersama (PKB). Kedua, perlindungan hukum hak-hak lainnya dari pekerja/buruh Nomor 67/PUU-XI/2013 sudah ada namun tidak sepenuhnya terlindungi, dikarenakan hak-hak non upah pekerja/buruh dikecualikan pembayarannya oleh kreditur Separatis.

The issue of legal protection for consumers is one that is championed in order to provide protection for the community as consumers. BPOM Semarang City has the duty to provide services for the community to supervise the circulating products to ensure their safety, however, there are still products that contain hazardous substances in circulation. Therefore this thesis is entitled "The Function and Role of BPOM in Consumer Protection Against Foods Containing Hazardous Ingredients in Semarang City".                The problem under study is to find out how the function and role of BPOM in dealing with food containing hazardous ingredients, what efforts have been made by BPOM on foods containing hazardous ingredients and the rights obtained by consumers in order to be safer against substances that contain hazardous ingredients.                The research method used is the type of normative juridical legal research. Specific research is descriptive analysis of primary and secondary data sources. Data collection methods used are interviews and literature study with research locations at BPOM Semarang City.             Based on the research obtained shows that the position of consumers is weak compared to producers, so consumers need the existence of UUPK and POM agencies as supervisors on the feasibility and safety of drugs and food to avoid losses suffered by consumers considering that there are still dangerous substances in the circulating products. The role of the government needs to be maximized in controlling, supervising and coaching and counseling to consumers and businesses.

AbstractDespite the attention of human rights has existed since long, but the struggle to get legal protection in state constitution looks after the birth of Magna Charta in England in 1215 which is followed by Declaration of Independence in the United States of America in 1776 and Declaration des droits de “I” home et du citoyen in France in 1780. In Indonesia this right has received legal protection in 1945 Constitution, RIS Constitution, or Temporary Constitution, and become much stronger after the birth of MPR Decree Number XVII year 1998 which is followed by Act Number 39 year 1999 on Human Rights, Act Number 26 year 2000 on Human Rights Court which is followed by Amendment of 1945 Constitution which govern specifically Human Rights Chapter in chapter X A which consist of 10 articles. Even though human rights in Indonesia have evolved considerably, but when we look further there is still many weaknesses which contradict one and another. For example: Article 281 Amendment of 1945 Constitution and Article 4 Act of Human Rights which adheres the principle of non retroactive absolutely with Article 43:1 Act of Human Rights Court and Explanation of Article 4 Human Rights Act which adheres the principle of retroactive for gross violation of human rights. Contradiction is also occurs in Article 4 Human Rights Act body and its explanation. Keywords: human rights.