Publication Search

The life of the Indonesian nation and state is guided by Pancasila as an ethical system. Pancasila as the basis of the state functions as a value system that directs people's behavior towards a just, harmonious and dignified life. In the ethical context of national life, Pancasila teaches important values such as tolerance, justice, humanity and unity. These values help build national unity amidst cultural, religious and ethnic diversity. In the current era of globalization, the urgency of Pancasila as an ethical system is increasingly important because the nation's noble values can be damaged by modern issues such as individualism, materialism and social conflict. Indonesian society can use Pancasila as an ethical guideline to develop ways of thinking and acting that are in accordance with the spirit of mutual cooperation, respect for human rights, and a balance between rights and obligations. Pancasila helps society unite and helps people make decisions, both institutionally and personally. Therefore, internalizing Pancasila values as an ethical system is a strategic effort to maintain the nation's immortality in facing the evolution of the times and realizing national ideals for a just, prosperous and prosperous life.

This study aims to analyze the role of Pancasila in the process of harmonizing international law and national law in Indonesia, with a focus on extradition agreements. As the state ideology and philosophical foundation of Indonesia, Pancasila provides principles that underpin the formation and implementation of national law. This study explores how Pancasila’s values, such as social justice and humanity, influence the policies and implementation of extradition agreements, as well as the challenges faced in aligning national law with international obligations. Using a qualitative approach and case studies, this research demonstrates that Pancasila functions as a moral and ethical guide that reinforces the integrity of Indonesian law in the global context. The findings are expected to provide insights into how the fundamental values of the state can strengthen the harmonization between national and international law and influence foreign policy and law enforcement in Indonesia.

This research examines the dilemma between national security and human rights protection in the context of emergency constitutional law in Indonesia. Through a juridical-normative approach, this study analyzes the balance between state authority in dealing with emergencies and the obligation to protect citizens' human rights. The findings indicate that although the state can restrict human rights during emergencies, such restrictions must comply with the principles of necessity and proportionality and not violate non-derogable rights. Indonesia's experience implementing emergency constitutional law, such as in the cases of DOM Aceh and the COVID-19 pandemic response, demonstrates the importance of regulatory reform to create a more comprehensive legal framework in maintaining a balance between national security and human rights protection. This research recommends updating the State of Emergency Law to align with current developments and strengthen oversight mechanisms to prevent abuse of emergency powers.

Internet users in the use of information have given rise to two opposite sides, where on the one hand it is easier in terms of access and utilization of information, while on the other hand it causes various kinds of illegal acts, one of which is copyright infringement in the form of film piracy which is currently inserted through illegal streaming sites resulting in losses for the creators of cinematographic works. This of course violates the ITE Law and the Joint Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights and the Minister of Communication and Informatics concerning the Implementation of Content Closure and/or User Access Rights, Copyright Infringement and/or Related Rights in Electronic Systems. This research is a normative juridical research using a legislative and conceptual approach, using legal materials from literature and the internet as a source of legal materials. The results of the study show: (1) The form of legal protection for the creators of cinematographic works in film piracy on illegal streaming sites is reviewed from the ITE Law in a preventive manner regulated in Articles 23-25, Article 25, Article 32 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the ITE Law and has been repressively regulated in Article 48 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the ITE Law and the Joint Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights & the Minister of Communication and Information related to Content Closure. (2) The effectiveness of the legal protection provided by the government to the creators of cinematographic works in the piracy of films on illegal streaming sites provided by the government through the ITE Law and the Joint Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights and the Minister of Communication and Informatics related to site blocking cannot be said to be effective until now because the legal factor itself has not sufficiently accommodated the protection of creators clearly in the event of film piracy on illegal streaming sites.

This consider explores the exchange between citizenship and the flow of political and Islamic law in Indonesia, the world’s  biggest Muslim-majority nation with a complex legitimate framework. The essential center of this inquire about is to get it how Islamic values are coordinates into open approach and the national lawful system, and their affect on administrative forms and national identity.Employing a mixed-methods approach, this consider utilizes subjective examination through in-depth interviews with legitimate specialists and policymakers, as well as quantitative examination of later approach information and enactment. Furthermore, the investigate compares the flow in Indonesia with encounters from other nations with blended lawful frameworks, such as Malaysia and Turkey, and investigates the challenges confronted in adjusting Islamic law with human rights.The key discoveries uncover that the integration of Islamic law inside Indonesia's national lawful framework presents both challenges and openings, especially within the domain of social arrangement usage and person rights security.  Moreover, the impact of Islamic legislative issues on the authoritative prepare contributes to the arrangement of approaches that reflect devout values. This investigate highlights the require for a adjust between devout standards and human rights, and its suggestions for national character and pluralism in Indonesia.The ponder gives important bits of knowledge for policymakers, scholastics, and lawful professionals in understanding the complex elements between Islamic law and open approach in a multicultural nation. It is expected that this investigate will contribute essentially to endeavors in legitimate change and the advancement of more comprehensive and evenhanded arrangements in Indonesia.

This research discusses how Indonesia can integrate Pancasila values in anti-terrorism policies, amidst international pressure which often leads to harsher approaches based on the standards of Western countries. An approach that prioritizes security can conflict with Pancasila principles, such as respect for human rights and social justice. Pancasila as the basic ideology of the state emphasizes the importance of balance between individual rights and the interests of society. In facing the threat of terrorism, Indonesia needs to adopt policies that not only strictly enforce the law, but also prioritize prevention through education, community empowerment and strengthening human values. This research aims to analyze how Pancasila values are implemented in Indonesia's anti-terrorism policy and the challenges that arise in harmonization with international norms. Globalization and technological developments pose new challenges in the spread of radical ideology, so policies are needed that are responsive but still based on Pancasila. Indonesia's anti- terrorism legal policy must be able to balance tough law enforcement with a humanist and dialogical approach, in line with the spirit of Pancasila which upholds just and civilized humanity. It is hoped that this research can contribute to more humane and effective policies.

Citizenship plays a crucial role in the legal system and judicial process of any country, including Indonesia. This abstract examines the impact of citizenship status on legal processes in Indonesia, detailing how citizenship affects various aspects of law enforcement, particularly in the context of criminal offenses. In Indonesia, the legal system categorizes individuals as Indonesian citizens (WNI) or foreigners, with each category receiving different legal treatment in criminal cases. In criminal law contexts, the difference in citizenship status can influence several factors, including jurisdiction, legal treatment, and specific rights afforded to both offenders and victims. For Indonesian citizens, legal proceedings are generally conducted under national law, referring to the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and other relevant statutes. Conversely, foreign nationals involved in criminal acts in Indonesia are subject to special regulations that govern how these cases are handled, including international cooperation and extradition. This study reviews pertinent regulations and judicial practices in Indonesia and explores how citizenship status affects the legal rights of offenders and victims, as well as the procedural aspects of the legal system. The research method used is a qualitative approach, involving case studies and normative analysis. Case studies will include analysis of various criminal cases involving individuals with different citizenship statuses, both Indonesian citizens and non-citizens. Data will be collected through literature reviews, interviews with legal practitioners, and analysis of legal documents and court decisions. The research also addresses the challenges faced in implementing laws related to citizenship status, including issues of human rights, legal protection, and justice. The findings suggest that while Indonesian law provides different treatments based on citizenship, there is an urgent need for harmonization and reform to ensure that legal processes are fair and transparent for all individuals, regardless of their citizenship status. This insight offers guidance on how the Indonesian legal system can be improved to ensure consistent legal protection and justice for all individuals involved in criminal cases.

This study examines the legal protection for stateless persons within the framework of citizenship and human rights. The focus is on assessing the effectiveness of international legal frameworks and national policies in safeguarding the fundamental rights of individuals without citizenship. The research employs a qualitative analysis of key legal instruments, including the 1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons and the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness, alongside case studies of policy implementation across various countries. The findings reveal that, despite a robust international legal framework, there are significant gaps in implementation and enforcement, leading to ongoing discrimination and human rights violations against stateless persons. The study recommends comprehensive policy reforms and enhanced international cooperation to improve legal protection for this vulnerable group.

This research explores the role of the Constitutional Court (MK) in protecting citizenship rights in Indonesia. As a constitutional judicial body, the MK holds a crucial responsibility to review laws against the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945), ensuring that fundamental rights of citizens, such as freedom of expression, the right to education, and the right to privacy, are not violated by existing legal policies. Through the mechanism of judicial review, the MK acts as a primary guardian capable of annulling laws that are in conflict with the constitution. This study examines various significant cases where the MK has played a critical role in safeguarding citizenship rights. We also identify various challenges faced by the MK, including issues in implementing rulings and potential political pressures that may affect the independence of this institution. From a global perspective, this research compares the role of the MK with constitutional bodies in other countries to provide a broader understanding of how the MK functions in an international context. The research employs doctrinal legal research, which is a process of discovering rules, principles, and doctrines to address the issues at hand. The research is prescriptive in nature. The methodology used is normative/doctrinal/library research. The findings indicate that although the MK has successfully protected citizens' rights through significant rulings, there remains an urgent need to improve the implementation of decisions and to safeguard the institution’s independence. Recommendations for enhancing the MK’s role include expanding legal education to the public, strengthening public access to judicial review mechanisms, and fostering closer collaboration with legal academics and practitioners. With these measures, the MK is expected to continue functioning effectively as a guardian of constitutional rights in Indonesia.

This article discusses the potential role of mosques as centers for educational innovation and training to improve community capacity. Through a literature review and case study, this article aims to explore how mosques can transform from simple places of worship into comprehensive learning centers. The method used in this study is a qualitative method, by making books, magazines, articles and journals related to the research theme, focusing on innovative education and training models that can be applied in mosques, the challenges that may be faced, and their potential benefits for the community. The results of the analysis show that with the right approach, mosques can become important buildings in human resource development and community empowerment in two innovations, namely Educational Innovation; (1) Establishing non-formal educational institutions such as TPA and MDA, (2) Routine syllabus studies, (3) Arabic language course institutions. Training Innovation; (1) funeral prayer training, (2) Youth mosque leadership training, (3) Preaching training.

This journal discusses the role of Pancasila in maintaining the balance between individual freedom and public order in Indonesian constitutional law. Pancasila, as the state foundation and ideology of the nation, occupies a central position in the formation of the legal system in Indonesia and serves as the source of all sources of law. In the context of constitutional law, Pancasila regulates how individual freedom is recognized as a constitutional right that is not absolute, but must be balanced with social responsibility and certain restrictions in order to maintain public interest and public order. This discussion highlights the challenges faced in maintaining this balance. This journal also provides suggestions for strengthening the normative foundation consistent with Pancasila, applying the principle of proportionality, strengthening the check and balance mechanism, and increasing public participation and legal education. Through the Historical Approach method, it is expected to examine the development of the rule of law and the principles of Pancasila from the past to the present.

Citizenship and education policies in Indonesia play a crucial role in determining children's rights and access to quality education. However, challenges arise when addressing children with unclear citizenship status, such as those born to parents without permanent citizenship or those caught in ambiguous legal situations. This abstract examines how the uncertainty of citizenship status affects the access to and quality of education for these children in Indonesia. The study highlights major issues faced, including limited access to formal schooling, lack of adequate official documentation, and legal instability that restricts educational rights. Additionally, it explores existing government policies and the challenges in implementing them concerning the protection of educational rights for children with unclear citizenship status. The findings reveal the need for more inclusive policy reforms and effective strategies to ensure that all children, regardless of citizenship status, can enjoy their right to quality education. The study suggests a more holistic, human rights-based approach to addressing these issues and advocates for enhanced collaboration between government agencies, civil society, and international organizations to develop sustainable solutions.

This research examines the integration of Pancasila values ​​in fatwas issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) regarding Islamic law, with the aim of understanding how the country's basic principles are accommodated in religious decisions that have a broad influence on society. Considering that the MUI plays a significant role in providing legal and moral guidance for Muslims in Indonesia, the fatwas it issues not only reflect an understanding of Islamic law, but must also be in line with the normative framework of Pancasila. This research uses a qualitative approach with analysis of the texts of fatwas issued by the MUI in the last five years, as well as in-depth interviews with experts in Islamic law and Pancasila. The research results show that, although the MUI attempts to integrate Pancasila values, there are several challenges in implementing these values, especially related to issues involving religious pluralism, human rights and social justice. The integration of Pancasila in the MUI fatwa is not only important to maintain social harmony amidst Indonesia's diversity, but also to ensure that the application of Islamic law can contribute to inclusive and just national development. Therefore, the MUI is faced with the crucial task of continuing to develop a more contextual and inclusive approach in formulating fatwas, so that it not only fulfills the demands of sharia, but also supports the nation's ideals as mandated by Pancasila.

Probative value refers to the extent to which the evidence provided is able to prove the facts being disputed. Evidence may be relevant in the sense that it relates to the case at hand, but relevance alone does not guarantee that the evidence will be well received or considered to have a significant influence. This study uses a qualitative research method with a conceptual approach. The data collection method was collected using library research, then analyzed using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. The results of the study show that the process of proof in criminal law plays a central role in upholding substantive justice. Evidence not only functions as a mechanism to test the truth of claims or accusations brought in court, but also as a tool to protect the human rights of the accused by ensuring that everyone is considered innocent until proven otherwise. Failure to assess probative value can lead to serious injustice in the form of wrongful conviction or wrongful acquittal. To address this problem, it is necessary to increase technical literacy among legal practitioners, as well as the application of more careful procedures in testing the validity and reliability of evidence.

Islamic criminal law significantly contributes to shaping a civilized citizenry through the enforcement of principles of justice, responsibility, and respect for human rights. This article aims to analyze how Islamic criminal law, with a maqasid al-shariah approach, provides a moral and ethical foundation for developing individual character as part of a civic community. The study identifies the core elements of Islamic criminal law, such as the concepts of hudud, qisas, and ta'zir, and examines their implementation in the context of a modern pluralistic state. Using a normative-juridical method and a comparative approach, this article explores the harmonization of Islamic criminal law with the positive legal system in Indonesia. The findings indicate that Islamic criminal law not only seeks to uphold legal justice but also aims to build a society rooted in ethical and civilized values. Integrating these values into national legal policies has the potential to strengthen a civic identity that is religious, just, and civilized, while respecting societal diversity. This article recommends enhancing Islamic legal education as a strategic effort to create synergy between Islamic criminal law and the development of exemplary citizens.

This study looks at the legal ramifications of changing the Republic of Indonesia's 1945 Constitution's articles pertaining to citizenship (UUD 1945). The complexity of citizenship issues has increased with globalization, especially when it comes to dual citizenship and the rights of Indonesians residing outside. This study is classified as doctrinal research since it examines legal sources to determine legal principles. The study finds that amendments to the UUD 1945 are necessary to better align Indonesia's citizenship policies with global developments. However, these changes must be carefully considered to protect human rights and maintain national loyalty and identity. Reforming Indonesia's citizenship laws should be done thoughtfully, with input from various stakeholders, to ensure the resulting policies are inclusive and adaptable to the current global context. This research aims to contribute significantly to the development of Indonesia's citizenship policies and to offer a foundation for policymakers in crafting regulations that are more responsive to global challenges.

This study aims to find out and analyze  the role of the prosecutor's office in determining the right to restitution for the crime of trafficking in persons based on case number 27/Pid.sus/2019/PN.Kpg. This research is a normative legal research (library research) supported by empirical data. This research focuses on the Role of the Prosecutor's Office in Determining the Right to Restitution for the Crime of Trafficking in Persons. The approach used in this study is the case approach. This research uses primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. This legal research is analyzed using the  Content Analysis legal material analysis technique. The results of this study show that (1) The existence of restitution is contained in Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning Trafficking, Article 4 of Perma No. 1 of 2022, and is contained in the Criminal Procedure Code. (2) The role of the prosecutor's office in determining the right to restitution of victims in the crime of trafficking in persons is to inform the victim of their rights in submitting restitution applications to the court, so that the suggestions that can be given to law enforcers, especially the Public Prosecutor, should be given socialization or training regarding Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of Trafficking in Persons, especially the provision of restitution,  so that there is a common perception in handling cases of human trafficking.

Pancasila, as the foundation of the Indonesian state, plays an important role in the legal system, including in the context of anti-terrorism law. This study aims to explore how the principles of Pancasila function as pillars in the formation and implementation of anti-terrorism law in Indonesia. The research method used is a qualitative approach with a literature review as the main method, which includes analysis of academic literature, legal documents, and interviews with legal experts. The results of the study indicate that the principles of Pancasila Belief in One Almighty God, Just and Civilized Humanity, Unity of Indonesia, Democracy Guided by the Wisdom of Deliberation and Representation, and Social Justice for All Indonesian People provide a moral and ideological framework underlying the creation and implementation of anti-terrorism law in Indonesia. Pancasila ensures that counter-terrorism efforts remain in accordance with the values ​​of humanity, social justice, and national unity. However, challenges such as potential human rights violations and abuse of authority need to be addressed to ensure that anti-terrorism law remains in line with the principles of Pancasila. This study recommends strengthening the enforcement of human rights, inclusiveness in policy making, and periodic evaluation and revision of anti-terrorism policies to improve their effectiveness and conformity to the country's core values.

The regulation of protection during armed conflicts is greatly aided by the distinction between the rights and protections granted to combatants and non-combatants under International Humanitarian Law (IHL). Nonetheless, there hasn't been much discussion in the literature about how nationality affects how these legal safeguards are applied. This study attempts to investigate how fighters' and non-combatants' rights and safeguards under IHL are impacted by nationality. The results show that nationality can have a substantial impact on the legal status and level of protection that individuals receive, regardless of whether they are combatants or not. This research examines obstacles to the application of legal safeguards and illustrates how nationality influences their implementation using case studies of the crises in Syria and Ukraine. The study suggests that within IHL, precise standards on nationality be developed.

Marriage is a human right, as stated in Article 28B paragraph (1) of the Second Amendment to the 1945 Constitution, and marriage is explicitly regulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage. Article 2 of the Marriage Law states that marriage must be registered according to the applicable laws and regulations. However, this cannot be fully implemented throughout Indonesia, especially in the Dsn Tanjung area, Taman Kec Jrengik Sampang. One of the factors preventing full implementation is that marriages are conducted underage. This research uses an empirical research approach, also known as field research. The purpose of this method is to investigate the applicable legal provisions and their implementation in society. The research results show that children born from unregistered marriages face difficulties in obtaining civil status and legal certainty.