Publication Search

This research aims to assess the legal considerations of the panel of judges in Decision Number 245/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst., particularly in recognizing the foreign court decision in the form of a moratorium ruling from the Singapore High Court and in determining the legal standing of the PKPU applicant in this case. This research employs a normative juridical method through a case study of Decision Number 245/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst based on Indonesian positive law. The data used consists of primary, secondary, and tertiary. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively by interpreting positive legal provisions, principles, and doctrines applicable in Indonesia to evaluate the panel of judges' considerations in this case. The research findings indicate that, first, the panel's recognition of the moratorium decision as grounds for rejecting the PKPU application contradicts Article 436 of the Reglement op de Rechtsvordering, which adheres to the territoriality principle. This recognition also conflicts with the principles of private international law adopted by Indonesia. Furthermore, the consideration regarding the absence of legal standing of the PKPU applicant due to the existence of the moratorium decision linked to choice of forum is inconsistent with Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (KPKPU Law) as lex specialis that supersedes debt settlement provisions in other legislation. Second, the research demonstrates that in practice, legal standing is determined based on fulfillment of formal and material requirements as stipulated in Articles 222, 224, and 8(4) of the KPKPU Law, which were satisfied in this case.

The digital transformation in Indonesia's land sector is marked by the implementation of electronic land certificates as regulated under Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency Regulation No. 1 of 2021. This policy aims to enhance efficiency and legal certainty in land administration. However, its implementation raises questions regarding the legal strength of electronic certificates and the protection of third parties, particularly good faith purchasers. This study uses a normative juridical approach to analyze the legal standing of electronic land certificates and the legal protection mechanisms for third parties in land transactions. The findings show that although electronic certificates hold the same legal force as physical certificates, there are still challenges related to data integration and legal safeguards for third parties. Strengthening regulations and the role of notaries/land deed officials (PPAT) is necessary to ensure the validity and legitimacy of electronic certificates and to achieve optimal legal certainty.

According to the state, all constructs of crime, especially domestic crime, are included with human rights violations, crimes against human dignity and discriminatory practices. Domestic crime, usually abbreviated as domestic violence, is a phenomenon that often occurs in or around the family. The majority of domestic violence is experienced by women or children because there are many aspects of life that are less or even unfair to them, thus providing opportunities for crimes against them. Physical abuse or violence, exploitation, neglect, and sexual abuse by spouses, children, or household staff are just some of the many forms of domestic crimes that can occur. In real life, there are many documented and unusual instances of domestic abuse. The purpose of this research is to determine and assess the impact of withdrawing a domestic violence report on the legal standing of the perpetrator. To examine the ambiguous standards surrounding the revocation of domestic crime reports, this research was written using normative legal research techniques with a statutory approach. The research findings show that, in accordance with Article 44 of Law Number 23 Year 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence, husbands who commit violence against their spouses can be subject to sanctions. Domestic crimes are included in the relative complaint offense but are only covered in Articles 51 and 52, which basically do not make it painful or difficult for someone to carry out daily activities or hold a job or other position. Shortly after the perpetrator was named as a suspect in this domestic violence case, the victim withdrew the domestic violence report. As a result, the revocation of this report has legal consequences with the issuance of a Letter of Termination of Investigation in accordance with Article 75 of the Criminal Code.  

Since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, the transformation of the health sector in Indonesia has taken place with the beginning of the era of digitization of health services, one of which is the digitization of the implementation of electronic medical records through the Regulation of the Indonesian Minister of Health (PMK) No. 24 of 2022 on Medical Records. Through this regulation, the Government provides freedom for health care facilities to choose the system to be used, which can be a system developed independently, a system developed by the Ministry of Health, or can also collaborate with vendors providing information systems or partner systems for short. However, there is no detailed description of the liability for leakage of electronic medical record data whose system comes from a partner system, so that clear boundaries are needed regarding this matter. This research aims to explore the legal standing of electronic medical record system providers or system partners and the legal liability provided in the event of an electronic medical record data leak. The result of this research is the position of the partner system as a form of PSE in accordance with the provisions of Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 on the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions and the legal liability of the partner system for leakage of electronic medical record data is as a Controller of Personal Data based on Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection.

This article discusses the legal status of WALHI Bali in filing a lawsuit at the Bali Governor's Court regarding Bali Governor's Decree No. 1.051/03-L/HK/2012. The method used in this research is normative legal method. The focus of this research is to examine PTUN decisions with case registration number: 01/G/2013/PTUN.Dps, as well as to analyze the existence of AAUPB violations in the issuance of the Bali Governor's Decree, as well as to ensure the proper implementation of AAUPB in the preparation and issuance of the Governor's Warrant according to observations Panel of Judges in Decision No: 01/G/2013/PTUN. dps

Hubungan hukum dalam pengelolaan lingkungan satuan rumah susun, melibatkan pengelola yang ditunjuk oleh penjual atau perhimpunan pemilik dan penghuni yang dibentuk oleh pemilik dan penghuni satuan rumah susun itu sendiri. Substansi sengketa berkisar mengenai penetapan service charge/IPL (luran Pengelolaan Lingkungan), retribusi dan beban-beban lain yang dianggap oleh pemilik/penghuni rumah susun tidak memperhatikan rasa keadilan. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah: 1) Bagaimana penyelesaian sengketa dalam pelaksanaan pengelolaan lingkungan rumah susun antara pengelola dengan pemilik?, 2) Apa yang menjadi pertimbangan hukum majelis hakim penyelesaian sengketa dalam pelaksanaan pengelolaan lingkungan rumah susun antara pengelola dengan pemilik pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Perkara Nomor: 318/Pdt.G/2016/PN. Jkt. Pst. dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Perkara Nomor: 687/Pdt.G/2019/PN. Jkt. Utr.?, 3) Bagaimana akibat hukum putusan tersebut bagi pengelola dengan pemilik? Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif (normative legal research). Analisis data yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif terhadap data sekunder sebagai data utama dan data primer sebagai data pendukung. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa dalam pelaksanaan pengelolaan lingkungan rumah susun antara pengelola dengan pemilik dapat dilakukan melalui 2 (dua) jalur, yaitu melalui mediasi dan gugatan di pengadilan. Pertimbangan hukum majelis hakim penyelesaian sengketa dalam pelaksanaan pengelolaan lingkungan rumah susun antara pengelola dengan pemilik pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Perkara Nomor: 318/Pdt.G/2016/PN. Jkt. Pst. dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Perkara Nomor: 687/Pdt.G/2019/PN. Jkt. Utr. berdasarkan keabsahan kedudukan pengelola dan keabsahan perjanjian pengelolaan. Putusan pengadilan memiliki akibat hukum bagi pengelola dan pemilik, yaitu pengelola haus memiliki legal standing sementara  pemilik wajib memenuhi kewajiban.

Penelitian ini tentang penegakan hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik dalam sengketa informasi antara LSM LGMI dengan Inspektorat Kabupaten Demak. Tipe penelitian yang dipakai dalam penulisan skripsi ini adalah tipe penelitian hukum empiris atau penelitian hukum non-doktrinal. Penelitian ini menggunakan spesifikasi penelitian secara diskriptif analitis, yaitu menggambarkan analisis karena hasil penelitian ini hanya melukiskan atau menggambarkan. Sumber data dalam penelitian empiris merupakan data yang berasal langsung dari sumber di lapangan. Sumber data dalam penelitian empiris merupakan sumber data primer dan sumber data sekunder. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan metode wawancara kepada pihak-pihak yang terkait langsung dengan permasalahan yang sedang diteliti. Analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah bersifat preskriptif. Sifat preskiptif dalam penelitian empiris ini artinya dimaksudkan untuk memberikan argumentasi terkait hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Penegakan hukum Undang- Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik di Kantor KIP Provinsi Jawa Tengah dapat dilakukan melalui proses mediasi dan melalui proses Ajudikasi non-litigasi. Dalam sengketa informasi publik antara LSM LGMI dengan Inspektorat Kab. Demak dilakukan peneakan hukum dengan ajudikasi non-litigasi dengan adanya Putusan Nomor 004/PTS-A/III/2019. Pada amar Putusan tersebut menyatakan bahwa Menyatakan bahwa Pemohon tidak memiliki Legal Standing atau kedudukan hukum dalam permohonan penyelesaian sengketa informasi mengenai salinan hasil audit atau tindak lanjut laporan dugaan tindak pidana pungutan liar di SMP Negeri 1 Wonosalam Kab. Demak dan permohonan penyelesaian sengketa informasi tidak dapat diterima. Sanksi yang dapat dikenakan berkaitan dengan Keterbukaan Infomasi Publik adalah adanya sanksi pidana yang diatur dalam Pasal 51 sampai denggan 57 Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 dan adanya sanksi administratif kepada Badan Publik sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 46 Ayat (1) dan Ayat (2) Undang-Undang keterbukaan informasi Publik.   Kata Kunci : Penegakan hukum, Sengketa Informsi, LSM LGMI dan Inspektorat