Publication Search

Corruption is a serious issue that hinders development and disrupts the social order in Indonesia. Efforts to prevent corruption rely not only on law enforcement but also on character building and the instillation of integrity from an early age. Education in schools plays a crucial role in shaping young generations with integrity and an awareness of anti-corruption values. Through a curriculum that emphasizes moral values, ethics, and social responsibility, schools can serve as the foundation for creating a society free from corruption. Anti-corruption education must become an integral part of the national education system. As a recommendation, the government and relevant stakeholders should strengthen the implementation of anti-corruption education in schools by providing teacher training and developing age-appropriate materials for students. The suggestion needed is to provide training to security guards and canteen guards, so that students get better anti-corruption education.  

Corruption is a serious challenge faced by Indonesia especially Bandar Lampung city, hampering development, undermining public institutions, and reducing public trust in the government. Efforts to prevent and address corruption are not only the responsibility of state institutions, but also require the active participation of various stakeholders, including civil society, the private sector, and the media. This article highlights the importance of collaboration between stakeholders in preventing and addressing corruption. By analyzing various collaborative initiatives that have been successfully implemented in several regions in Indonesia, this article shows that citizen involvement can strengthen the effectiveness of anti-corruption policies, increase transparency, and encourage public accountability. The role of citizens is crucial as social monitors who participate in monitoring the implementation of anti-corruption policies and programs implemented by the government. The success of efforts to eradicate corruption is also determined by the synergy between related institutions and the active involvement of the community. With organized and mutually supportive cooperation, it is hoped that efforts to prevent and handle corruption can be more effective and sustainable, thus strengthening clean and accountable governance in Bandar Lampung City.

This article discusses the crucial role of security guards and canteen vendors in building anti-corruption character among the youth in educational environments. In an era where corruption poses a serious problem across various sectors, character education based on anti-corruption values becomes imperative. Security guards, as the frontline protectors in schools, serve not only to maintain security but also to exemplify good behavior for students. Meanwhile, canteen vendors can influence students' attitudes toward integrity and transparency through honest business practices. Through the collaboration of both parties, it is hoped that a conducive school environment for instilling anti-corruption values can be created. The conclusion of this article is that the active involvement of security guards and canteen vendors significantly contributes to shaping students' anti-corruption character. Recommendations include the need for training and socialization regarding anti-corruption values for both parties to enhance their roles in character education.

Extraordinary Crime is a label given to the crime of corruption. This is because corruption can hamper the economic life of the nation and state. Therefore, the eradication of corruption cannot be handled in the usual way but through an extraordinary handling. Corruption is a serious problem that can threaten the continuity of the Indonesian nation, coupled with the fact that the perpetrators of corruption are officials of government agencies who have a duty to foster and serve the community for the fulfillment of justice and public welfare. One of the easy targets for people who commit corruption, namely officials of government agencies in launching their actions, is the procurement sector of government goods and services. As happened in the procurement of shallot seeds in Malaka Regency in the 2018 fiscal year involving government agency officials and private parties.The problem formulations in this study are: (1) Factors causing corruption in the procurement of government goods and services, namely the procurement of shallot seeds in Malaka Regency (2) The impact of corruption in the procurement of shallot seeds in Malaka Regency (3) Countermeasures to improve the process of procurement of government goods and services in Malaka Regency.The writing of this thesis uses a type of juridical-empirical research with a case approach method, so that it is based on applicable laws and regulations and data obtained in the field. The case approach taken in this research is related to the corruption case of shallot procurement in Malacca Regency in the 2018 fiscal year.The results of the study show that the factors causing corruption in the procurement of shallot seeds in Malaka Regency are the intention of the defendants, the existence of authority and the opportunity for corruption. The impact of corruption in the procurement of shallot seeds in Malaka Regency is a state loss of Rp. 4,770,725,000.00 (four billion seven hundred seventy million seven hundred twenty-five thousand rupiah), not only limited to state losses but also losses felt by the community and government agencies involved in the corruption case of shallot seed procurement, namely the Government Goods / Services Procurement Section at the Regional Secretariat of Malaka Regency and also the Agriculture and Food Security Office of Malaka Regency. Therefore, efforts to eradicate corruption in the procurement of goods and services of the Malaka district government are not only carried out by the government alone, but also involve the active role of the community in preventing corruption in the government goods/services procurement sector and also countermeasures involving cooperation between the Malaka district government and the Malaka district police.

Corruption is one of the most destructive social, political and economic problems in various countries. Corruption is also a serious problem faced by all countries in the world, and Indonesia is one of them. Corruption is not only an act that violates the law, but also violates moral values, destroys trust, and hinders domestic progress. Efforts to eradicate corruption in Indonesia have been carried out in various ways, but until now corruption still occurs in various ways and is carried out by different political parties and institutions. Corruption poses several dangers, including threats to society, individuals, the younger generation, politics and the country's economy. In Law Number 31 of 1999, criminal acts of corruption are classified into the following categories: financial damage, bribery, embezzlement from public office, extortion, fraud, procurement disputes, gratification. Eradicating corruption requires integrated law enforcement, international cooperation and harmonious regulations. Not only international cooperation, but increasing effectiveness in preventing corruption, community involvement is needed. Public participation in supervision and stricter law enforcement can create an anti-corruption system. By involving the community we can strengthen transparency and minimize acts of corruption

Ethics and integrity play a crucial role in creating an academic environment free from corrupt practices. As a center of learning, the campus should serve as a model for its students in upholding high moral and ethical standards. This article aims to highlight the importance of ethics and integrity as fundamental pillars in efforts to prevent corruption within the academic setting, such as on campus. Through a qualitative approach, data were collected from interviews with two campus workers—a canteen staff member and a parking attendant—who frequently interact indirectly with students and staff. These interviews explore their perspectives on the importance of being honest, responsible, and disciplined in their daily work. The findings show that even though they are not involved in academic activities, both workers contribute significantly to fostering an anti-corruption culture on campus. The canteen staff emphasized the importance of transparency in setting food prices to maintain students' trust, while the parking attendant stressed the need for discipline and order in managing the parking system to prevent irregularities. This article also examines how simple ethical behaviors, such as honesty in transactions and adherence to rules, can have a substantial impact on creating an integrity-driven campus environment. Therefore, the implementation of ethics and integrity is not solely the responsibility of academics but also of every element of the campus community without exception. In conclusion, strengthening the culture of ethics and integrity across all aspects of campus life is an essential part of a sustainable strategy to prevent corruption.

The corporate criminal culpability concept is point by point in Article 20, passage (1) of Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Annihilation of Debasement, as revised by Law Number 20 in 2001. Concurring to this article, on the off chance that a enterprise locks in in debasement, both the organization and/or its administration can confront criminal charges. The term "and" implies a cumulative approach, holding both the corporation and its management accountable simultaneously, whereas "or" implies an alternate method, holding either the corporation or its management answerable. The usage of "can" generates ambiguity because its application is dependent on the interpretation of prosecutors and judges. Authoritative, conceptual, and case think about techniques were utilized to conduct the investigate. The information infer that Article 20, passage (1) of the PTPK Law is subject to numerous elucidations, coming about in regulating equivocalness. This is aggravated by the absence of precise standards for determining criminal responsibility for either the organization, its management, or both. This leads to conflicting legal applications by judges, resulting in legal confusion. Hence, it is required to reexamine the corporate risk demonstrate for debasement charges beneath Article 20, passage (1) of the PTPK Law.    

Corruption is a major issue hindering the development of society and the economy in Indonesia. This study discusses the key steps in preventing corruption by emphasizing the importance of building integrity and transparency within the community. Through interviews with various individuals, insights were gained regarding public perceptions of corruption and the measures that can be taken to mitigate it. The findings indicate that education, the instillation of honesty values, and active community participation are crucial in creating an environment free from corruption. This research aims to contribute to the efforts in combating corruption in Indonesia.

Children's integrity is an important aspect that must be built from an early age to prevent corrupt behavior in the future. Family and school are the main factors that have a very important role in building a child's integrity. The family as the first unit has the responsibility to set an example of good character by instilling the values ​​of honesty, responsibility and discipline through open communication. On the other hand, schools act as a formal environment that not only teaches the academic curriculum, but also provides character education and equips children with an understanding of ethics and morality. This research uses a qualitative approach by interviewing parents and teachers and analyzing various literary sources such as books, journals, and so on. The research results show that this collaboration not only increases awareness of the importance of integrity, but also reduces the potential for corrupt behavior.

Corruption action by police officers is part of law enforcement efforts aimed at preventing and eradicating corrupt practices that are detrimental to the state and society. Corruption, as a criminal act involving abuse of power for personal gain, requires a systematic approach and high integrity from law enforcement, including the police. This article discusses the role of the police in handling corruption cases, the challenges faced in the enforcement process, and the steps needed to increase the effectiveness of law enforcement against criminal acts of corruption. Through policy analysis and case studies, factors that influence the success of enforcement are identified, such as internal corruption, lack of transparency, and coordination between other law enforcement agencies. The conclusions of this research highlight the importance of reform in police institutions, special anti-corruption training, and increased external supervision to create a police force that is clean and has integrity in efforts to eradicate corruption.

One of the roles of the Bank Perekonomian Rakyat (BPR) is to provide credit to improve the economic welfare of the lower middle class through micro and small business services. However, the provision of BPR credit is prone to misappropriation, one of which is used as an election campaign fund. This research is a legal research in analyzing the problem using literature study which is analyzed qualitatively. The results obtained from this research are that the misuse of BPR credit used as campaign funding can be suspected of being a criminal act of corruption and money laundering because it is obtained from state finances and there are indications of disguising and hiding money. The source of state finances provided to BPRs can be viewed in terms of state capital participation in the form of securities and the provision of facilities provided by the government. In anticipating campaign funds originating from criminal acts, the Badan Pengawas Pemilu must cooperate with other parties such as the Public Accounting Office to conduct campaign fund audits and related law enforcement officials such as the Pusat Penelusuran dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan and the Corruption Eradication Commission to prevent and prosecute the use of money from corruption crimes for campaign funding.

Village funds disbursed by the government sourced from the APBN are still considered as assets that continue to be targeted by certain Village Heads with low morals. The high political costs to get the number one seat in the village cause people to do anything to get it. Because the village funds disbursed are quite tempting. In just one year in mathematical calculations, the capital spent during the process of getting the position of village head can be returned. Therefore, the suboptimal performance of the village head is due to many stumbling blocks of interest. The village head is no longer focused on the promised programs. The village head only focuses on efforts to return the campaign funds spent so far. The high number of corruption cases that hit the village head if it does not become the government's attention, the disbursement of village funds which were originally intended to make the village strong, advanced and independent will be in vain. That is why the role of the Village Consultative Body is needed here, an independent institution whose status is outside the village government. The function of the BPD which is expressly stated in the village law has not been implemented optimally, this results in village fund leaks always occurring every year in almost all regions of Indonesia. This study uses a normative legal research type, namely research that focuses on research on related laws and regulations. The results of this study indicate that Village Fund Supervision in Improving the Performance of the Village Consultative Body has not been guided and based on the principles of Law No. 6 of 2014 concerning Villages. The BPD has not fully carried out its functions. And the obstacles experienced are mainly in the HR aspect besides the absence of regulations that explicitly explain how the technical supervision of the allocation of village funds.

Corruption in the public sector remains a major obstacle to regional development, threatening the effectiveness of financial management and public services. Gaps in financial supervision and management that are not transparent are the cause of fraud in the use of the budget. The agency theory states that corruption is caused by a conflict of interest between the community as the principal and the government as an agent, with the external auditor as a supervisor to prevent irregularities. The focus of this research is to find out the relationship between corruption in local governments and capital expenditure, local own revenue, audit opinions, and audit findings. This study uses quantitative methods and uses secondary data. The sample consistSed of 250 local governments (districts/cities/provinces) in Indonesia during 2020-2022. The analyst method uses SPSS 27 with multiple linear regression method. The test results showed that capital expenditure had no effect on corruption, local own revenue and audit findings had a positive effect on corruption, and audit opinions had nothing to do with corruption in local governments.

The Political parties spread promises to influence society in a good or bad way before the general election. However, the communication of political party brands does not affect the image and public trust in political parties. This study analyzes and describes the Perindo Party's political communication strategy for increasing Electability in the 2024 general election. Case studies with a qualitative approach as a research method. Data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documentation. The study results show that the political communicators of the Perindo Party have been able to convey the message of the people's economy and the eradication of corruption well; messages are expressed both verbally and nonverbally, either directly or through the media. The media used are print media, mass media, and social media, but unfortunately, they have not used traditional communicative media such as puppets in Java; non-electoral communicators provide good feedback, but electrally, they have not produced lousy feedback. Perindo experienced a "failure" because it did not reach the parliamentary threshold of 4%. However, for the Regional People's Representative Council, the Perindo Party can place its representatives in Jakarta, Kalimantan, Maluku, etc.

This study uses empirical juridical research, which is research with field data as the main source of data, such as the results of interviews and observations, with the aim of analyzing and describing the law enforcement model for cases of corruption in the development funds of the Waigete Health Center. as well as identifying and analyzing factors that hinder law enforcement in the case of corruption of the Waigete Health Center development funds. The results of the discussion in this study show that, (1). The Waigete  Health Center uses the Due Process Model which emphasizes the need to ensure that every individual has the right to be treated fairly and has access to an independent court including investigation, prosecution, and fair justice. and the right to appeal, but with strict legal procedures, this model slows down the process of resolving cases.  The crime eradication process focuses more on the interests of the rights of suspects than on the public interest, so according to researchers in the process of resolving corruption cases, this model is not appropriate to use because it emphasizes justice and human rights but also has the potential to slow down the legal process. (2). The factors that hinder law enforcement in handling corruption cases of the Waigete Health Center development fund consist of two factors, namely internal factors, namely the lack of prosecutors who slow down the law enforcement process and reduce the effectiveness of case handling, and external factors, namely the slow examination process and the loss calculation process so as to hinder law enforcement.

Law No. 20 of 2001 has institutionalized the provision of the death penalty for corruptors under certain circumstances. This research analyzes juridically the application of the death penalty against perpetrators of corruption from a normative, positive law, ethical, and religious perspective. The method used is a normative juridical approach with secondary data. Data analysis is carried out systematically to identify themes and formulate operational hypotheses. The results showed that the death penalty in the corruption law has been regulated for certain circumstances. Still, its implementation faces constitutional challenges from three critical perspectives: the Pancasila legal state framework, the 1945 Constitution's provisions on the right to life, and human rights principles. International frameworks such as the ICCPR, various legal interpretations, and religious approaches enrich this debate. In conclusion, applying the death penalty for corruption offenders in Indonesia cannot be implemented due to constitutional dilemmas arising from these various perspectives, thus requiring reformulation and in-depth study of legal norms and human values

The defendant Haris Yasin Limpo, who is the Main Director of the Regional Drinking Water Company (PDAM) of Makassar City, together with Irawan Abadi, committed the crime of corruption by distributing bonuses and company bonuses/services based on Ujung Pandang Level II Regional Regulation Number 6 of 1974 from 2017-2019 should be based on Government Regulation Number 54 of 2017 concerning Regional-Owned Enterprises, the Defendant also paid dual-purpose insurance premiums for the positions of Mayor and Deputy Mayor of Makassar in 2016-2018 even though it is in the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 2 of 2007 concerning Organs and Regional Drinking Water Company personnel who must be included are only Directors and Employees. The imposition of Article 3 of the Corruption Law on the defendant is inappropriate as per Corruption Court Decision Number 59/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2023/PN Mks because the defendant does not fulfill the elements of abusing authority. The panel of judges should apply Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Corruption Law because its elements are more appropriate to the actions committed by the Defendant.

This study aims to analyze the role of IPSAS in increasing transparency and accountability to control corruption in developing countries such as Indonesia. This research uses descriptive analysis method with literature study approach. The implementation of IPSAS in Indonesia is the right step to take to control corruption that is currently rampant. This study analyzes that IPSAS can improve the quality of public sector financial reporting by creating transparency and accountability that can prevent fraud. However, to adopt IPSAS optimally, Indonesia needs to pay attention to the quality of its staff to be more competent, and improve its infrastructure.

Corruption is a crucial problem and an extraordinary crime that has wide-ranging impacts on society, the nation, and the state. The issue of corruption certainly requires serious attention. This cannot be separated from the fact that corruption has become commonplace, where its presence can be found from the central to regional levels, including rural areas. The cases of this crime continue to increase year by year. The rampant corruption cases necessitate eradication efforts involving every element of society by instilling anti-corruption values in daily life. This can be packaged through strengthening anti-corruption character as a strategic step by educating and reinforcing mental attitudes in a structured way to foster and strengthen anti-corruption behavior. The target for strengthening anti-corruption character is universal, regardless of age, gender, environment, or educational level. As long as a person can receive anti-corruption education, this step will be effective as a strategy to prevent and reduce corruption. Educational institutions are one of the bodies that need to implement anti-corruption education programs, as seen at Mega Islamic Boarding School High School in Semarang City. The eradication of corruption by instilling anti-corruption education is very important, especially for students, as they are the younger generation who will one day hold the future of the nation. Moreover, Mega Islamic Boarding School High School in Semarang City is an Islamic-based educational institution, which firmly holds that corruption is forbidden because it threatens human safety and causes harm to dignity and wealth, and those who commit it will face penalties not only in this world but also in the hereafter

This research is empirical juridical, with the aim of finding out the qualifications for regulating criminal acts of bribery committed by the head of a Non-Governmental Organization and to find out the criminal responsibility. The expected benefit of this research is that it can provide knowledge, can be an accurate source and become a reference for similar research. regarding the discipline of Criminal Law, especially Anti-Corruption Education.This result shows that the qualification of the regulation of criminal acts in the case of the chairman of the Non-Governmental Organization is contained in Article 23 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption and other criminal acts related to corruption. then the proof of the article of other criminal acts related to corruption, of which there are three articles that do not have to be accompanied by state losses. If it is connected with the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 25 of 2016 specifically Article 2 and Article 3, the name of which is a formal offense to a material offense, it is mandatory that there must be state losses. But specifically Article 21, Article 22 and Article 23, the proof of his actions does not have to be a state loss because the qualification of the crime is a formal crime, not a material crime, so the change in mindset of the regulation and qualification of the crime in Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption from formal to material is only for Article 2 and Article 3. Criminal liability of the General Chairperson of the Anti-Corruption People's Alliance (ARAKSI) for committing a criminal act, with the existence of an unlawful act seen from the qualification of the regulation of the criminal act, then violating Article 23 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption