Publication Search

Hypertension is one of the leading non-communicable diseases contributing significantly to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite the availability of extensive electronic medical record data in healthcare institutions, these data are often utilized only for administrative reporting rather than predictive analysis. Consequently, opportunities to identify age groups with a higher probability of developing hypertension remain underutilized. This study aims to implement the Naïve Bayes classification algorithm to analyze age distribution and classify the risk of hypertension among patients using healthcare data. The research adopted the Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) methodology, including business understanding, data understanding, data preparation, modeling, evaluation, and deployment. Patient medical record data consisting of demographic and clinical attributes, including age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, body weight, gender, and hypertension status, were processed using the Naïve Bayes algorithm. Model performance was evaluated using a confusion matrix by measuring accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and balanced accuracy. The implementation demonstrates that the Naïve Bayes algorithm is capable of classifying hypertension risk efficiently while providing probabilistic information regarding age groups with a higher tendency to experience hypertension. The resulting classification model offers an effective decision-support tool for healthcare providers in conducting targeted screening, preventive interventions, and evidence-based health planning. The findings also indicate that data mining techniques can transform routinely collected medical records into valuable clinical knowledge for early hypertension prevention and healthcare decision-making.

The Free Nutritional Meal Program (MBG) is a government policy that is widely discussed by the public through social media, especially TikTok. Various comments that have emerged indicate differences in public opinion towards the program, so an analysis is needed to determine the tendency of public sentiment. This study aims to analyze TikTok user sentiment towards the Free Nutritional Meal Program using the Naive Bayes method. The research method is carried out through several steps, namely collecting TikTok comment data, preprocessing text, labeling sentiment data into positive, negative, and neutral, feature transformation using TF-IDF, and classification using the Naive Bayes algorithm. Based on the analysis of 500 comment data, the results show that positive sentiment dominates public opinion by 42% (210 data), followed by negative sentiment by 36% (180 data), and neutral sentiment by 22% (110 data). Testing the classification model using Naive Bayes produces excellent performance with an accuracy rate of 86%, precision of 84%, recall of 85%, and F1-score of 84%. The conclusion of this study shows that the Naive Bayes method is effective as an approach in social media sentiment analysis to map public responses to government policies.

The development of social media, especially TWITTER, has become one of the main means for people to express opinions and criticism on various issues, including the performance of law in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze public sentiment towards the performance of law based on TWITTER user comments using the Naïve Bayes algorithm. The research data consists of 1004 comments collected from several videos related to legal topics. The analysis process includes the stages of data crawling, pre- processing (text cleaning, normalization, and tokenization), labeling sentiment into positive, negative, and neutral, and testing the Naïve Bayes model. The results show that the Naïve Bayes algorithm is able to classify sentiment with an accuracy level of 93.73%. The distribution of sentiment from 1004 comments shows that the majority of public opinion is (negative/positive/neutral), which indicates that public perception of the performance of law is still (critical/positive). These findings are expected to be input for related parties to understand public opinion and improve the quality of legal performance in

QRIS (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard) has become a widely used national digital payment standard. User satisfaction with this service needs to be monitored continuously to ensure its sustainability. This study aims to predict the level of QRIS user satisfaction based on their experiences and perceptions expressed organically on the Twitter social media platform. The method used is sentiment analysis with the Naive Bayes classification algorithm implemented using RapidMiner software. The research data was obtained from Twitter user comments collected through web scraping techniques. The text data then went through a preprocessing stage that included cleansing, stopword filtering, stemming, and tokenizing to be prepared as features ready to be processed by the model. The data was divided into training (80%) and testing (20%) subsets for model training and validation. The results showed that the Naive Bayes model was able to predict user satisfaction sentiment with an accuracy of 80.99%. These findings indicate that the model is highly accurate in identifying satisfied comments and sufficiently sensitive in detecting dissatisfaction. This study concludes that sentiment analysis of Twitter UGC data using Naive Bayes is an effective and efficient approach for predicting QRIS user satisfaction in real time. The practical implication of this study is to provide an automatic feedback system for service providers to monitor public sentiment and take targeted corrective actions.

The growth of information technology has driven changes in consumer behavior, one of which is through e-commerce platforms such as Shopee. This phenomenon has generated a large number of customer reviews, including those for local cosmetic products such as Wardah. These reviews serve as an important source of information for understanding customer perceptions and satisfaction levels. However, manual analysis of large and linguistically diverse datasets is inefficient and potentially subjective. This study aims to implement the multi-category Naive Bayes algorithm to classify the sentiment of Wardah product reviews on Shopee into three categories: positive, negative, and neutral. The data were collected using a web scraping technique and processed through a series of preprocessing stages including case folding, tokenization, stopword removal, stemming, and text cleaning. Subsequently, term weighting was performed using the TF-IDF method prior to classification. Model performance was evaluated using a confusion matrix as well as accuracy, precision, and recall metrics. The results indicate that the multi-category Naive Bayes algorithm achieved an accuracy of 86.00%, a precision of 86.63%, and a recall of 98.24%. This approach can assist business practitioners in objectively understanding customer opinions and support decision-making in business strategy and product development.

Social media X (Twitter) has become the main platform for the Indonesian public to express opinions, including on the trend of 'kabur aja dulu' (let's just run away for a bit). This research aims to classify the sentiments of the public using the Naïve Bayes and Support Vector Machine (SVM) methods, and to compare the accuracy of both in sentiment analysis. Data was collected via the Twitter API with the hashtag #kaburajadulu, resulting in 2,067 tweets, which, after the cleansing process and manual labeling, left 385 data points. The analysis process followed the CRISP-DM stages, which include business understanding, data understanding, data preparation, modeling, evaluation, and deployment. Model evaluation was conducted using a confusion matrix with accuracy, precision, and recall metrics. The classification results show that 82% of tweets have a positive sentiment and 18% negative. The Naïve Bayes algorithm achieved an accuracy of 86.49%, slightly lower than SVM, which reached 88.05%. In conclusion, Support Vector Machine is more effective in sentiment classification on public opinion data. This research contributes to the digital mapping of public opinion and recommends the development of automatic labeling methods as well as the exploration of advanced algorithms in the future.

The rise of social media has created a digital public sphere that enables users to express their opinions on social and political issues openly and in real-time. One of the most discussed topics on social media platform X is the trending hashtag #IndonesiaGelap, which reflects public concern and criticism regarding various governmental and societal conditions. This study aims to conduct sentiment analysis on tweets containing the hashtag to determine the overall sentiment trend among users. The method employed in this research is the Naive Bayes classification algorithm, known for its simplicity and effectiveness in text classification. To enhance the model’s performance, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is applied to optimize feature selection and parameter tuning. The dataset consists of public tweets collected via the Twitter API, followed by preprocessing, feature extraction using TF-IDF, and sentiment classification into three categories: positive, negative, and neutral. The results indicate that the integration of PSO significantly improves the classification accuracy of the Naive Bayes model compared to the baseline. The majority of tweets related to #IndonesiaGelap exhibit a negative sentiment, indicating widespread public dissatisfaction and criticism. This research is expected to contribute to a better understanding of public perception and serve as valuable input for stakeholders in addressing social issues in the digital age.

This study aims to develop a sentiment classification method for YouTube user comments related to the game Love and Deepspace using the Naïve Bayes algorithm, focusing on improving the text data processing and understanding user perceptions. Comment data were collected through scraping from YouTube videos, followed by preprocessing including text cleaning, normalization, stopword removal, stemming, and translation into English. Initial labeling was conducted using TextBlob, then the data were randomly sampled for training the Naïve Bayes model. Evaluation involved comparing sentiment distributions and visualization using Word Cloud and bar charts. The Naïve Bayes model achieved an accuracy of 77.36% in sentiment classification. The sentiment distribution shows differences between TextBlob (positive: 1,011, neutral: 1,312, negative: 575) and Naïve Bayes (positive: 901, neutral: 1,627, negative: 370), with Naïve Bayes being more conservative. The Word Cloud visualization identifies dominant words such as "bang," "game," and "main," while the bar chart shows the largest proportion of neutral sentiment. Naïve Bayes is effective for sentiment classification on informal comment data, with significant differences from rule-based methods like TextBlob. This research contributes to the development of text data processing techniques and user perception analysis, as well as opening up optimization opportunities with other algorithms like SVM for better accuracy.

Social media has evolved into a significant platform where consumers freely express their opinions, experiences, and levels of satisfaction regarding various products, including those offered by Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). The comments and reviews shared by customers on these platforms contain diverse sentiments that can serve as valuable indicators of how consumers perceive product quality. Understanding these sentiments is crucial for MSME owners, as it allows them to evaluate their products and adapt to market expectations more effectively. This study aims to analyze customer sentiment toward MSME products on social media by utilizing the Naïve Bayes algorithm, a widely used classification method in text mining. The data used in this research consist of customer comments collected from various social media platforms. The research process involves several stages, including data collection, manual labeling of sentiments, text preprocessing (such as tokenization, case folding, and stopword removal), and splitting the dataset into training and testing subsets. Subsequently, the classification process is carried out using the Naïve Bayes algorithm to categorize sentiments into positive, negative, and neutral classes. The results of this study demonstrate that the Naïve Bayes method is effective in classifying customer sentiments with a satisfactory level of accuracy. These findings provide a comprehensive overview of consumer perceptions regarding the quality of MSME products. Furthermore, this research is expected to assist MSME business owners in understanding customer feedback more systematically and using it as a basis for improving product quality and enhancing customer satisfaction in a competitive digital marketplace.

The distribution of social assistance represents a key government strategy to enhance the welfare of low-income communities. Nevertheless, its implementation frequently faces challenges related to inaccurate targeting, often caused by uneven data collection and subjective decision-making processes in identifying eligible beneficiaries. This study aims to compare the performance of the K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Naïve Bayes algorithms in determining eligibility for social assistance recipients in Banyuputih Kidul Village. Both models were evaluated using a confusion matrix with performance indicators including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The findings reveal that the KNN algorithm outperformed Naïve Bayes in identifying recipients of the PKH social assistance program, achieving an evaluation score of 99%, compared to 86% for Naïve Bayes. These results indicate that KNN provides higher predictive reliability for eligibility classification. This research is expected to support the development of an objective, data-driven decision support system that can assist village governments in distributing social assistance more accurately and transparently.

This research develops a machine learning model to classify customer loyalty using the Random Forest algorithm. Customer churn is a critical issue that reduces revenue and increases acquisition costs. A dataset of 50,000 customers from global e-commerce and subscription platforms was processed through data cleaning, imputation, outlier handling, and class balancing with SMOTE. The Random Forest model was built as a baseline and optimized with hyperparameter tuning. Evaluation using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score shows that the optimized model achieved 90.81% accuracy and 83.87% F1-score, outperforming previous Naïve Bayes approaches. Feature importance analysis highlights customer service interactions, lifetime value, and demographic factors as key predictors of churn. These findings demonstrate Random Forest’s effectiveness in churn prediction and provide practical insights for customer retention strategies

This study evaluates public sentiment toward Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 regarding the age limit for presidential and vice-presidential candidates, a controversial issue closely related to Indonesia’s democratic dynamics. Understanding public opinion on Twitter, as a major platform for political expression, is essential for informing electoral policy formulation. Data were collected using Tweet Harvest through Google Colab and analyzed using the Naïve Bayes algorithm as the primary sentiment classification method, with RapidMiner employed to support and streamline the analytical process. The analysis process included data cleaning, text normalization, stopword removal, manual labeling of 80 tweets as training data, and automatic sentiment classification to identify positive and negative sentiments. From a total of 151 analyzed tweets, 84 (55.63%) were classified as negative and 67 (44.37%) as positive, with the model achieving an accuracy of 66.67%. These findings suggest a tendency toward public opposition to the decision, reflecting dissatisfaction among Twitter users. The study demonstrates that Naïve Bayes is reasonably effective for sentiment classification with limited datasets and provides insights for policymakers in understanding public responses to election-related regulations.

Since the announcement of the policy plan for a name transfer system in the sale of used mobile phones, the issue has attracted widespread public attention and discussion. People have expressed their opinions on social media platforms, particularly TikTok. This study aims to classify the sentiment of TikTok users using Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms. The data were collected through a comment scraping technique on related content.The research stages include text preprocessing, sentiment labeling into positive, negative, and neutral categories, and feature extraction using TF-IDF. The classification process employs Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine algorithms, which are then evaluated based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results of this study indicate that both methods are capable of classifying sentiment effectively. However, the Support Vector Machine method is superior to the Naive Bayes method with an accuracy rate of 99.57% compared to 94.30%. This study is expected to help the government understand public responses to the planned policy of the used mobile phone name transfer system.

Sentiment analysis on social media is widely used to represent public perceptions of sports performance, particularly in international competitions. This study aims to analyze the sentiment of YouTube user comments regarding the performance of the Indonesian National Football Team during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Asian Qualifiers. The data were collected from user comments on videos related to the matches and analyzed using a machine learning–based sentiment analysis approach. Sentiment classification was performed using the Naive Bayes algorithm. The results indicate that the proposed approach is able to effectively identify public sentiment toward the national team’s performance during the qualification matches. The findings of this study are expected to provide insights into public perceptions and contribute to sentiment analysis research in the field of sports.

Detection and identification of plant diseases is critical to the success and efficiency of agricultural production. Plant disease outbreaks are becoming more frequent throughout the world, and the presence of these diseases in cultivated plants has a significant impact on productivity. Therefore, researchers are focusing on developing effective and reliable plant disease detection methods. Thus, farmers can take advantage of early detection of this disease to minimize future losses. This article discusses machine learning approaches as well as decision trees, K-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, support vector machines (SVM), and random forests for detecting coffee leaf diseases using leaf images. The above-mentioned classifications were researched and compared to determine the most suitable plant disease prediction model with the highest accuracy. Compared with other classification algorithms, the SVM algorithm achieves the highest accuracy of 99.75%. All the models trained above will be used by farmers to quickly identify and classify new diseases in images as a prevention strategy. As a preventive measure, farmers can detect and classify new diseases in images early.

The performance of the Indonesian National Team (Timnas) in the 2026 World Cup qualifications has triggered massive and diverse responses on social media, particularly on platform X. This study aims to identify and classify public sentiment regarding Timnas Indonesia's performance into positive, negative, and neutral categories using a data mining approach. Text data was processed through pre-processing stages, term weighting using TF-IDF, and the application of the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) to address significant class distribution imbalance. The classification algorithm employed was Multinomial Naïve Bayes. Model performance evaluation was conducted by comparing two training-testing data split scenarios: 90:10 and 80:20 ratios. The results indicate that public opinion is dominated by negative sentiment at 73.2%, reflecting public disappointment. In terms of model performance, the 90:10 ratio scenario yielded the best accuracy of 80%, outperforming the 80:20 ratio which recorded an accuracy of 75%. These findings demonstrate that combining Multinomial Naïve Bayes with the SMOTE technique is effective in handling imbalanced text data and is capable of accurately mapping public perception.

This study aims to analyze the factors that influence students' interest in continuing their education to college using a machine learning approach. Data was collected through an online questionnaire completed by 727 students between July 27 and August 22, 2025, covering 23 variables consisting of respondent identity (gender, grade level, major) as well as internal and external factors such as parental support, learning motivation, and preferred type of college. The data preparation stage was carried out through column cleaning, deletion of empty data, encoding of categorical variables, and division of the dataset into 80% training data and 20% test data. The Naive Bayes algorithm of the CategoricalNB type was used because it was suitable for the categorical nature of the data. The evaluation results showed that the model was able to predict student interest with 96% accuracy. For the class of students interested in continuing their studies, the precision, recall, and F1-score values were above 0.95, while the performance in the class of students who were not interested was slightly lower due to the smaller amount of data. These findings show that Naive Bayes is proven to be effective and reliable in classifying students' interest in continuing their studies and can be the basis for decision-making in designing more targeted educational strategies.

Crime, an unlawful act that contradicts ethics and norms, has now become a primary factor for the police in Lampung province. This presents a challenge for the police institution in predicting high crime rates. However, there are still many crimes that have not become the main focus of problem-solving at the Lampung Regional Police.This research aims to identify the types and criminal acts of crime with the highest recorded incidence in a crime dataset by performing classification using the Naïve Bayes algorithm. The data was obtained from investigators at the Directorate of General Criminal Investigation of the Lampung Regional Police, with a total of 12,034 JTP (Total Criminal Acts) and 7,518 PTP (Crime Resolution) data points for each type of crime, distributed across the Regional Police, City Police, and District Police throughout Lampung province. The classification process using the Naïve Bayes algorithm reveals the relationship between the work unit (Satker) and the type of crime handled, thereby identifying crime patterns based on the location where they are handled. The results of the research, which involved converting numerical data into binomial (binary) form using the "Numerical to Binominal" feature in Rapid miner, show that the analysis and modeling process, especially in algorithms like Naïve Bayes or decision trees, is more effective when using data in a binary format. Thus, the initial dataset can be visualized in the form of a , with the size of the text varying according to the level of each high-incidence crime; the larger the text, the more frequently or significantly the crime occurred or was reported. The application of this method can help in identifying patterns, dominant trends, and areas of focus for more targeted law enforcement efforts or crime prevention policies.

Data mining is a technique of several fields of science to find previously unknown relationships in the data warehouse so that it becomes an information that can be used later. The unwise use of electricity will of course have an impact on the high use of electricity, therefore it is expected that every community understands the effort to use electricity wisely. Therefore, authors perform analysis of data mining on these electrical usage data in order to know which is a small, medium and large category. The authors use data on electrical use questionnaire as much as 200 data which is then presented into the ARFF format. In performing author analysis using WEKA Tools. The method used is Naive Bayes classification method with the greatest percentage of accuracy obtained using the Use Training Set Correctly of 80.5%, using a 5-Fold Cross Validation Correctly of 75%, and using 10-Fold Cross Validation amounted to 74%. While the result of the selection of the attributes using the algorithm classifier attribute evaluation (ClassifierAttributeEval) is stated that the most influential attribute against the electrical power usage classification is Electonic Goods.

AImbalanced data remains a significant issue in heart disease classification using machine learning, as it tends to cause models to overestimate the majority class while ignoring minority classes with high clinical value. This can lead to a decrease in accuracy and the model's ability to accurately detect disease cases. Therefore, this study aims to assess the effectiveness of oversampling techniques, namely Random Oversampling and Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), in improving the performance of the K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes (NB), and Random Forest (RF) algorithms. The dataset used comes from Kaggle and consists of 918 data sets with 12 attributes representing patient information related to heart disease prediction. The research stages include data preprocessing, baseline model testing, and re-evaluation using the two oversampling methods. Experimental results show that oversampling can improve the performance of all algorithms. KNN achieved the best results with SMOTE, with an accuracy of 72.98% and an F1-score of 75.39%. In the Naive Bayes algorithm, both oversampling techniques produced relatively stable performance, with the highest F1-score of 73.56% using SMOTE. Meanwhile, Random Forest showed the most optimal performance when combined with Random Oversampling, with an accuracy of 79.19% and an F1-score of 81.51%. These findings confirm that the success of data balancing techniques is strongly influenced by the characteristics of the classification algorithm used, and provide a practical contribution in determining strategies for handling imbalanced data in health research.