Publication Search

This article examines three major streams of Islamic political thought in Indonesia through a comparative analysis of the ideas of Mohammad Natsir, Abu Bakar Ba’asyir, and Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur). Mohammad Natsir embodies the constitutional–integralist perspective, which seeks to formalize Islam as the foundation of the state by utilizing democratic mechanisms and constitutional political processes. In contrast, Abu Bakar Ba’asyir reflects a radical–ideological orientation that firmly rejects democracy and advocates the full implementation of Islamic Sharia through extra-constitutional and non-parliamentary movements. Meanwhile, Abdurrahman Wahid represents a substantive–cultural approach, opposing the formal institutionalization of Islam within the state while promoting Islamic values as ethical guidance for building a tolerant and pluralistic nation. The contrasting viewpoints of these three figures highlight the diversity of Islamic political discourse in Indonesia and illustrate the evolving interaction between religion and state. Overall, this study demonstrates how Islamic thought continues to adapt and remain relevant within Indonesia’s multicultural and democratic context.

Competition in the media business is increasingly difficult as the number of online media grow and access to news becomes easier. Each media strives to maintain its existence and remain the public's preferred source of information, including Good News from Indonesia (GNFI). This article discussed GNFI's strategy through the application of search engine optimization (SEO) techniques and the challenges encountered in SEO update. Data were collected through observation, interview, and document review from January to August 2025. The results show that GNFI applied on-page and off-page SEO techniques as a strategy to increase visibility in search engines. The presence of an AI Overview posed a challenge in itself, as it could reduce the number of click view the news portal. The application of SEO techniques was not only a technical optimization strategy but also a form of media adaptation to the changing digital journalism landscape influenced by technological advances. 

This study aims to explore how interpersonal communication plays a role in the process of constructing self-identity within the “Jemuah Keos” community in Surabaya. This community functions as an alternative social space inhabited by individuals with diverse creative backgrounds, such as musicians, motorcycle builders, visual artists, and subculture enthusiasts. The formation of identity in this community is not solely driven by individual expression but also shaped through social interactions that are reflective and rich in meaningful symbols. The study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive case study method. Data were collected through participatory observation, semi-structured interviews with nine informants, and documentation of various visual artifacts representing the community’s activities. The data analysis process follows the interactive model by Miles and Huberman, which consists of three main stages: data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The theoretical framework used in this study refers to Joseph A. DeVito's concept of interpersonal communication, which includes self-disclosure, empathy, emotional support, symbolic exchange, social values, as well as reflective interaction and role negotiation in social relationships. The findings indicate that interpersonal communication is a key element in shaping and negotiating personal identity. Cultural symbols such as clothing style, vehicle modifications, visual language, and daily interaction patterns become primary means of identity expression. The "Jemuah Keos" community demonstrates openness, equality, and a critical stance against the dominance of mainstream culture. Interpersonal communication within this community also plays a role in building collective solidarity and voicing critical views on existing cultural standards. The identity formed is not only personal but also part of a larger community identity.

The development of digital technology has provided convenience in various aspects of life, but also presents new challenges in the form of cybercrime. One of the increasingly widespread modes in Indonesia is the spread of APK (Android Package Kit)-based malware via short messages offering fake job vacancies or fictitious package notifications. When the victim downloads and installs the application, the perpetrator gains access to personal data and banking accounts, which are then used for criminal acts. This phenomenon causes great financial and emotional losses for the community and tests the effectiveness of criminal law in dealing with technology-based cybercrime. This study uses a normative juridical approach with an analysis of laws and regulations, scientific literature, and actual case studies. The results of the study show that the perpetrators can be charged with Articles 30, 32, and 35 of the ITE Law, as well as provisions in the new Criminal Code. However, the implementation of law enforcement still faces challenges, such as digital evidence, limited investigator capacity, and minimal cross-country cooperation. Therefore, cyber law policy reform, increasing digital literacy in the community, and strengthening coordination between law enforcement agencies are needed.

This research explores the institutional capabilities of Local Government and BUMDes Tirta Mandiri in managing the tourism potential of Umbul in Ponggok Village, Klaten Regency. It aims to assess the extent to which local actors demonstrate capacity in the dimensions of thinking ahead, thinking again, and thinking across, as conceptualized within the dynamic governance framework. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, this research adopts a case study method through field observations, in-depth interviews, and analysis of village planning documents. The findings indicate that the success of Umbul Ponggok’s tourism development is not merely attributable to its natural endowments, but also to the capacity of the village government and BUMDes to formulate long-term policy directions, critically review and refine existing initiatives, and foster cross-sectoral collaboration. These results highlight the critical importance of strengthening village institutional capabilities and human resources as a foundation for implementing adaptive and forward-looking policies.

Drug abuse and trafficking are transnational issues that require serious attention from various countries. Indonesia and the Philippines, two countries in Southeast Asia, have developed different institutional approaches in combating drugs through the Badan Narkotika Naional (BNN) and the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA). This study aims to compare both institutions from the cultural-cognitive pillar based on William Richard Scott’s institutional theory. The method used is descriptive qualitative research with a literature study approach. The results show that BNN prioritizes rehabilitative and educational approaches that are increasingly accepted as a reasonable treatment pattern in Indonesia. Meanwhile, PDEA implements a repressive approach that is supported by most of the Filipino society, despite being accompanied by human rights violations. These findings indicate that collective thinking frameworks and public legitimacy play a crucial role in shaping institutional strategies and impacts in each country. This study provides significant implications regarding how societal mindsets influence the effectiveness of drug eradication efforts.

This research examines the role of SIMKARI (Sistem Informasi Manajemen Kejaksaan) in enhancing transparency and accountability at the High Prosecutor’s Office of Gorontalo in the digital era. The implementation of SIMKARI, as a digital management information system, is aimed at improving the efficiency of data management, monitoring, and reporting within the institution. Through qualitative research methods including literature study, observation, and interviews with key stakeholders at the High Prosecutor’s Office of Gorontalo, this study identifies both the benefits and challenges associated with SIMKARI's use. The results indicate that SIMKARI has significantly contributed to the transparency of public information and the accountability of internal performance. However, challenges such as limited digital literacy and infrastructure issues remain. The study concludes that continuous improvement and strategic collaboration are necessary to optimize SIMKARI’s effectiveness in supporting a transparent and accountable justice system.