Publication Search

This study aims to identify and analyze the leadership style of the Cilampunghilir Village Head in implementing village governance. The study used a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through interviews, observation, and documentation. Informants were selected purposively, including the village head, village secretary, village officials, hamlet heads, and relevant community leaders. Data analysis was conducted using an interactive model that included data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results show that the village head's leadership style tends to be democratic and participatory. The village head emphasizes collective decision-making by prioritizing consensus through deliberation and encouraging citizen involvement in every step of governance. In decision-making, the village head strives to involve the wider community so that policy outcomes are well-received. In terms of motivation, the village head actively provides encouragement, rewards, and builds reciprocal cooperation with village officials and residents. He recognizes the importance of appreciation and trust in order to build a cooperative work environment. Furthermore, in communication, the village head is known for being open, accessible, and willing to listen to the aspirations of villagers. In terms of controlling subordinates, the village head provides clear direction, delegates tasks according to competence, and enforces discipline to ensure the smooth implementation of village programs. This indicates a leadership style that balances authority with empowerment. However, the study also identified several weaknesses, including a lack of representation of marginalized groups, low frequency of outreach activities, and unequal access to information. Therefore, it is recommended that deliberation forums be strengthened with a more inclusive approach, diversified outreach methods through the use of digital channels, and increased transparency be implemented to optimize village governance.

Street Children are one of the complex social problems in big cities in Indonesia The Kupang City Government has issued a policy through Kupang City Regional Regulation No. 8 of 2013 which regulates the Handling and Empowerment of Street Children, Vagrants, and Beggars in its area. The Social Service has not been fully effective in supporting social welfare. This can be seen from the problem of Street Children in Kupang City, where there are still many underage children who are often seen wandering the streets. They are involved in various activities, such as selling newspapers, snacks, and even begging to anyone who stops. The type of research used in this study uses empirical legal research where this research method functions to see the law in a real sense and examine how the law works in the community. The results of the research and discussion show that (1) the results of the research conducted at the Kupang City Social Service are related to the Duties and Responsibilities of the Social Service in providing social welfare services for street children. This refers to the Kupang City Regional Regulation Number 8 of 2013 concerning the Handling and Empowerment of Street Children. As the implementer, the Social Service has the authority to provide guidance and control to street children. In addition, the implementing agents involved also carry out their duties and functions in accordance with their roles as regional apparatus, ensuring that the coaching process runs in accordance with the responsibilities carried out. (2) Factors that hinder the city social services in providing services in the field of social welfare for street children in Kupang City include internal factors.  

Bandung Village has strong economic potential through the development of local handicraft business units and Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes), but in its financial management the village experienced a decline in Village Original Revenue (PADes) from IDR 100 million in 2023 to IDR 93 million in 2024. The decline in PADes is an important indicator that reflects possible inefficiencies or weaknesses in aspects of governance, particularly accountability. This paper aims to capture an evaluation of the accountability of the use of APBDes in Bandung Village, Banjar Sub-district, Pandeglang Regency in managing its budget. With a focus on its impact on the effectiveness of community empowerment. The research method used is a qualitative method with a case study approach. The research was conducted in Bandung Village, Banjar Sub-district, Pandeglang Regency, Banten Province. Data was collected through interviews, observations, literature studies, and documentation using Policy Evaluation theory and Accountability theory. The results showed that from the analysis using evaluation theory, there were indicators that had not been met, namely adequacy and equity due to limited resources, namely funds provided by the central government. However, the analysis using accountability theory has fulfilled all indicators due to the strong commitment of the village government to advance the village. This accountability can be seen through reports on each program outcome and evidence of content uploaded on social media such as TikTok and Instagram.

metropolis, and village improvement to gain stability and fairness in development. Allocation of Vilthe large price range is the right of the village as district/metropolis governments have the proper to reap trendy Allocation funds (DAU) and unique Allocation price range (DAK). The expected effects of the Village Fund Allocation are the advent beta the village budget to finance village government packages, both village operations, and village community empowerment to improve village authorities services, improvement, governance, and network empowerment. Goal to determine the effectiveness of the Village Fund Allocation policy in Marga Sungsang Village, Banyuasin II District, Banyuasin Regency, South Sumatra visible from the context, input, manner, and product and evaluation of the extent of Village Fund Allocation in the control category technique: this is quantitative research with a cross-sectional method drawing near. Result: typical, this size has a big move-sectional scale, particularly: the overall context is 79.05 the general input is 76.10, the overall process is eighty one.45 and the overall product is seventy six.88. limitations: based on the researcher's direct theel in the research process, there are numerous barriers, along with the range of respondents is simplest 33 people, direction, twhichiswhichetheless not enough to describe the state of aff, airs and the item of studies which specializes in the effectiveness of the add program in terms of context, input, method, and product and level of control of Village Allocation within the class of Sungsang Marga Village, Bnayausin II District, Banyuasin Regency, South Sumatra. Contribution: For Sungsang Marga Village, Banyuasin II place, South Sumatra Banyuasin, to take advantage of extra village subsidies and increase similarly development of network development and empowerment. F, or the aTher this research to boom knowledge and expand peproperlyon andregardingal inregardinghe problem of coping with the allocation of village budget to solidarity improvement and empowerment. For the Alma mater, the outcomes of this lexpecteddexpectedato dd new references from the analysis of add management in improving network improvement and empowerment.