Publication Search

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has created various digital innovations, but it has also generated new forms of crime through the misuse of deepfake technology. This study aims to analyze the legal liability of social media platforms for the dissemination of AI-based deepfake content and the forms of legal protection for victims of digital fraud, particularly elderly groups, in the case of the “magical money ritual” scam using the identity of Ujang Busthomi. This research employs normative legal research methods using statutory and case approaches. The results show that perpetrators of deepfake fraud can be held criminally liable under Article 28 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 45A paragraph (1) of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and Article 378 of the Indonesian Criminal Code concerning fraud. In addition, social media platforms as Electronic System Providers also bear preventive and repressive responsibilities under the ITE Law, Government Regulation on Electronic Systems and Transactions, and the Personal Data Protection Law to prevent the spread of illegal content. Legal protection for victims is carried out through criminal law enforcement, personal data protection, restitution mechanisms, and the enhancement of digital literacy in society.

Pesatnya perkembangan teknologi blockchain dan arus globalisasi telah mendorong penggunaan Bitcoin di Indonesia, yang kini diakui sebagai komoditas dalam perdagangan berjangka. Namun, karakteristik anonimitas dan desentralisasi mata uang digital ini membuka celah signifikan bagi kemunculan cybercrime, seperti pencucian uang dan peretasan, yang menuntut perhatian yuridis serius. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dampak teknologi tersebut terhadap risiko kejahatan siber serta efektivitas regulasi yang berlaku. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan untuk menelaah kerangka hukum terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya dualisme regulasi di Indonesia, di mana Bappebti melegalkan Bitcoin sebagai aset investasi, sementara Bank Indonesia melarangnya sebagai alat pembayaran. Ketidaksinkronan ini, diperparah dengan sifat lintas batas blockchain, menciptakan tantangan dalam penegakan hukum terhadap kejahatan siber. Disimpulkan bahwa harmonisasi regulasi antara otoritas keuangan dan penguatan aturan keamanan siber sangat mendesak dilakukan guna memitigasi risiko kejahatan tanpa menghambat inovasi ekonomi digital.

The suggestions put forward are: Law enforcement against counterfeit money distribution crimes must require a structured and comprehensive strategy. One important step is to increase the capacity of law enforcement officers, including the police, prosecutors, and judges, through special training on counterfeit money crimes. Improving digital forensic and counterfeit money detection capabilities, including the use of the latest technology. This increase in competence will help officers identify the perpetrators' modus operandi and speed up the investigation process. In addition, the formation of a special unit or task force that focuses on handling counterfeit money cases can also strengthen the effectiveness of handling cases in the field. Then community involvement in preventing counterfeit money circulation must be optimized through broad public education regarding the characteristics of genuine and counterfeit money and reporting procedures if suspicious money is found. This awareness campaign can be carried out through mass media, social media, and cooperation with educational institutions. In the digital era, the use of information systems and technology such as counterfeit money databases and money circulation tracking systems is also an effective solution. By involving all elements of government, law enforcement, financial institutions, and the community, law enforcement against counterfeit money distribution crimes can be more effective, fair, and have a long-term impact.

This study aims to analyze cryptocurrency investment models in relation to the prevention of money laundering (Anti-Money Laundering/AML) activities. Cryptocurrency, as a growing form of digital investment, has garnered attention from regulators due to its potential money laundering risks. This paper explores preventive strategies that can be implemented within cryptocurrency investment systems, including the use of blockchain technology, KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures, and international regulations such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) guidelines. Through a qualitative method based on literature review and policy analysis, the study identifies investment models that can minimize money laundering risks while maintaining profitability for investors. These findings provide insights into the challenges and solutions in developing a safer cryptocurrency investment system that complies with AML regulations.

The Bill on the Limitation of Cartal Money Transactions (RUU PTUK) is a regulation regarding the limitation of cartal money transactions to 100 million rupiah in a day either in one transaction or several times, more than that must use digital money. The purpose of this bill is to reduce circulation and emphasize counterfeit money and reduce corruption activities. This paper aims to identify the problems and impacts of the passage of the PTUK Bill on corruption and money politics in Indonesia. The PTUK Bill in its application requires public participation to support the PTUK Bill, besides that the public needs to understand the consequences of money politics on the sustainability of government.

This research discusses the criminal act of money laundering through crypto assets and the form of criminal liability for crypto assets as an object of money laundering in Indonesia. Crypto assets function as an investment not for currency as a means of payment, but crypto assets are legally designated as digital commodity objects in the form of assets. Crypto assets have the threat of being misused as a new mode of money laundering to hide and disguise the proceeds of criminal acts. This research is structured with a statutory approach, concept approach and case approach with data collection based on literature and secondary materials.The results of the discussion of this research show that legitimate crypto assets as digital commodities can turn into illegitimate or illegal crypto assets as a result of the object of the means of criminal acts of money laundering. Money laundering through crypto assets that fulfill the elements of the criminal act of money laundering has criminal liability. The perpetrators of money laundering through crypto assets can be reached and held accountable according to the money laundering article violated in Law Number 8 Year 2010.

. In the development of this massive information system, all countries in the world are competing to modernize to benefit their countries, not only in the form of technology, but also into the economic field. In the economy is also known as a payment system that can be carried out by a person or a company in making transactions and so on. Transactions in the realm of companies can also be associated with the payment of salaries to employees or laborers. In paying wages to employees, of course, you can use any currency depending on the agreement by both parties, namely the company and the employees themselves. For example, payments using Bitcoin as a means of paying wages or salaries to laborers. This research uses an analytical descriptive method in the form of a literature study by discussing how the legality of Bitcoin in Indonesia as a means of payment and how to guarantee employee rights paid through Bitcoin..

Perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen dalam transaksi e-commerce online menjadi topik penting di era digital saat ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kerangka hukum yang ada untuk melindungi konsumen dalam transaksi jual beli online pada platform e-commerce. Melalui kajian literatur dan analisis peraturan yang berlaku, penelitian ini mengidentifikasi dan mengevaluasi perlindungan hukum yang tersedia bagi konsumen dalam transaksi online. Temuan penelitian ini menyoroti pentingnya peraturan yang jelas dan efektif dalam melindungi konsumen, seperti hak pembatalan dan pengembalian uang, perlindungan terhadap penipuan, dan penyelesaian sengketa yang adil dan bijaksana. Sementara banyak negara telah mengadopsi peraturan yang mengatur transaksi online, masih ada tantangan dalam menerapkan dan menegakkan perlindungan hukum yang efektif bagi konsumen. Hasil penelitian ini dapat memberikan gambaran bagaimana perlindungan hukum konsumen dapat ditingkatkan dalam transaksi e-commerce online.

The development of the era of economic and financial digitalization is developing so rapidly, that the purpose of this writing is to find out how the relationship between the time value of the rupiah influences over time. In addition, of course, the development of the era of economic and financial digitalization has had an impact on Indonesia's progress. Often companies have confusion in investing in securities, in this article the author wants to further discuss the role of the money supply and the time value of money in investing in securities. Of course, in making an investment decision, a company must carry out financial analysis related to stocks, bonds and capital markets. The method used is qualitative by collecting, analyzing and processing data from accurate and reliable sources such as books, journals and government websites. The results of this study indicate that by analyzing the money supply and the time value of money, it will influence companies in making investment decisions on securities using fundamental analysis.