Publication Search

This consider points to assess the affect of brand image on customer obtaining behavior in a computerized setting by joining quantitative strategies and counterfeit insights (AI)-based opinion examination. Essential information collection was conducted through an internet overview of 212 respondents matured 21–35 a long time who routinely make online buys, whereas auxiliary information was gotten from 5,000 customer comments on social media and e-commerce destinations. The comes about of the relapse examination appeared that brand image components such as believe (β = 0.37), seen quality (β = 0.31), and passionate association (β = 0.28) have a critical impact on buy purposeful (R² = 0.62, p < 0.01). The discoveries from the estimation investigation appeared that 72% of customer suppositions were positive, supporting the quantitative comes about and underlining the significance of the enthusiastic viewpoint in acquiring choices. This think about contributes to the advancement of hypothesis by combining essential and auxiliary information analyzed utilizing AI innovation, and emphasizing the significance of computerized notoriety and enthusiastic perspectives in forming brand quality. The comes about of this ponder open up unused points of view in creating data-based promoting procedures within the computerized period.

 A brand is one of the most valuable intellectual assets in the business sector, serving not only as a product identity but also as a reflection of reputation and quality. However, the increasing phenomenon of brand infringement indicates the urgent need for stronger and more effective legal protection. Brand infringement brings various negative consequences, including loss of consumer trust, unfair competition, and significant financial losses for brand owners. This study aims to analyze brand infringement from a criminological perspective, identify causal factors, and evaluate the role of law in addressing such violations. The research employs normative legal methods through analysis of statutory regulations, legal and criminological theories, and a literature-based approach using secondary data obtained from books, journals, and legal documents. The findings reveal that criminology provides relevant insights through theories such as Rational Choice Theory, which explains that perpetrators calculate the risks and benefits before committing the violation, and Anomie Strain Theory, which highlights how the inability to achieve economic or social goals legally can drive individuals or groups to commit brand infringement. The classification of violations includes imitation, counterfeiting, misuse, and unlawful exploitation of brand rights. Several causal factors were identified, including weak legal supervision, limited enforcement, and the high consumer demand for cheaper counterfeit products. Furthermore, the study underlines the essential role of the criminal justice system in addressing brand infringement through the enforcement of criminal, civil, and administrative sanctions as regulated under Law Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. In conclusion, brand infringement is not merely a legal issue but also a criminological problem that requires comprehensive handling through effective law enforcement, stronger supervision, and increased public awareness to protect intellectual property and ensure fair business practices.