Publication Search

Conflicts in transmigration areas are generally multidimensional and influenced by social, economic, land, and institutional factors. This study aims to identify the forms and distribution of conflicts in three districts of the transmigration area, namely Momi Waren District, Ransiki District, and Oransbari District, as well as to formulate a smart system-based conflict resolution approach through the use of spatial data, local institutions, and local wisdom-based settlement practices. Based on field mapping, four main categories of conflict were identified: 1) Land conflicts occur throughout the transmigration sites in the form of claims to transmigration land that has not been handed over to transmigrants because the compensation price is below normal. In addition, there is no ATR BPN office in South Manokwari Regency, one of whose functions is community empowerment and conflict resolution. 2) Economic conflicts occur because transmigrants are registered and recorded in the population registry, making it easy for them to access capital. Several economic activities in agriculture and transportation services are dominated by transmigrants, causing economic jealousy. 3) Social conflicts occur when the distribution of social assistance is uneven and the excessive use of illegally sold alcoholic beverages causes social unrest. 4) Institutional conflicts occur when civil servants, police, and military personnel are recruited, and not all indigenous Papuans who are nominated can be accommodated, requiring the involvement of tribal councils to formulate recommendations for recruitment that prioritize indigenous Papuans. The root causes of the conflict were analyzed using a root cause analysis approach that covered unclear land boundaries, unequal economic access, weak coordination between institutions, and low social trust due to differences in interests between groups. This study utilizes best practices from the Tribal Council, the South Manokwari Regency Transmigration and Manpower Office, the Religious Harmony Forum, and the Social Services Office as the basis for developing smart maps for an early warning system for conflicts. The results of the study formulate a Smart Conflict Resolution System framework consisting of three main components: (1) participatory spatial mapping of conflicts and key actors, (2) integration of institutional databases and social-customary mediation channels, and (3) design of smart maps as a mitigation and decision-making tool in transmigration areas. This system is expected to strengthen collaborative governance, prevent conflict escalation, and realize inclusive and sustainable management of transmigration areas

The implementation of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) has become a key priority of the Semarang City Government's policy in achieving equitable and sustainable health insurance. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the UHC program in Semarang City, focusing on three main aspects: financing, accessibility, and the quality of health services. Additionally, this study examines the effectiveness of the Pangeran Diponegoro Program as a local innovation to accelerate universal coverage achievement. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, with data collected through surveys of 100 respondents, in-depth interviews with policymakers and service providers, and analysis of regional policy documents. The findings show that although UHC membership coverage has reached 99.92%, challenges remain in accessibility and service quality, particularly in the suburban areas and vulnerable populations. The SERVQUAL analysis of service quality shows high scores for empathy and responsiveness but lower scores for reliability and service assurance. The Pangeran Diponegoro Program has proven effective in reaching unregistered groups, but still faces coordination issues between sectors and limited human resources. The study recommends strengthening collaborative governance, improving data verification systems, and developing community-based service innovations to ensure the sustainability of UHC.

This research investigates the integration of renewable energy systems within coastal conservation areas through public-private partnership (PPP) frameworks to achieve dual objectives of environmental sustainability and economic development. The study addresses the critical challenge of balancing energy infrastructure development with ecological preservation in sensitive coastal ecosystems, where biodiversity and community livelihoods are often at risk due to increasing industrial and urban pressures. A mixed-methods approach is employed, combining case study analysis, stakeholder interviews, and economic modeling, to generate a comprehensive perspective on the opportunities and constraints of renewable energy deployment in these regions. Case studies highlight successful international practices of PPPs that have facilitated renewable energy projects while safeguarding marine and coastal ecosystems. Stakeholder interviews with government agencies, local communities, and private sector representatives reveal the importance of transparent governance, shared responsibility, and inclusive participation in ensuring long-term project sustainability. Economic modeling further demonstrates that well-structured PPP models can reduce implementation costs by 30–40% while adhering to biodiversity conservation standards and regulatory frameworks. Findings underscore that renewable energy projects, when embedded within collaborative governance structures, not only contribute to reducing carbon emissions but also create employment opportunities, stimulate local economies, and enhance community resilience. This study contributes to the sustainable development literature by providing an actionable framework for integrating renewable energy infrastructure in environmentally sensitive areas through PPPs. The proposed framework emphasizes adaptive policy design, capacity building, and equitable benefit-sharing, offering practical insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers seeking to reconcile energy needs with ecological protection in coastal regions.

The relationship between sustainability and future governance plays a pivotal role in the development of green architecture planning in Indonesia. As the country faces escalating environmental issues and rapid urbanization, integrating sustainable principles into architectural design and urban governance has become essential. This paper explores how future governance models can support the implementation of green architecture, focusing on energy efficiency, resource management, and environmental resilience in Indonesian cities. Key challenges such as regulatory frameworks, the inclusion of stakeholders, and the adaptation of traditional architectural practices to modern sustainable standards are examined. By fostering collaborative governance approaches, including partnerships between government, private sectors, and communities, Indonesia can create more sustainable urban environments. Additionally, green architecture, which emphasizes energy conservation, renewable resources, and ecological harmony, can contribute to the resilience of cities against climate change. This study highlights the importance of aligning architectural practices with governance policies that prioritize sustainability, ensuring that urban growth in Indonesia is both environmentally responsible and adaptive to future challenges.

The increase in population without the support of adequate waste management facilities, such as the availability of Temporary Shelters (TPS), has caused the people of Blitar Regency to have the habit of throwing rubbish carelessly in rivers or the habit of burning rubbish. This can cause various negative impacts on the environment and health. This research highlights the importance of the "Bacem Berseri" Waste Bank program to create public awareness in managing waste in a healthier and more sustainable way. The aim of this research is to analyze the implementation of collaborative governance in waste management in Bacem Village, Sutojayan District, Blitar Regency. The research method used was descriptive qualitative, data collection was carried out through in-depth interviews with stakeholders, including Environmental Service officials, village heads, administrators of the "Bacem Berseri" Waste Bank, and local residents. Data analysis techniques include data collection, data condensation, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of this research show that collaboration between parties, including government, society, NGOs and the private sector, can increase the effectiveness of waste management through collaborative governance mechanisms. Key findings include the importance of face-to-face dialogue, facilitative leadership, commitment to process, and shared understanding in increasing community participation and building trust. The Waste Bank system implemented has had a positive impact in reducing waste accumulation and providing financial benefits for residents. However, the challenge lies in efforts to increase public awareness in all RTs to participate actively.

The problem of waste is a complex problem that will never end, especially in developing countries. The increasing population of humans is accompanied by an increase in the amount of waste generated. Sidoarjo Regency is a regency that is registered as the regency with the largest volume of waste in East Java, which causes overload of waste in its landfill. This research aims to clearly understand the process of collaborative governance in the waste reduction program at Jabon Landfill, Sidoarjo. This research method uses a qualitative method. Data collection was carried out through documentation and literature study. The data analysis method in this study is descriptive-qualitative. The theory used in this study is the collaborative governance theory by Ratner (2012). The results of this study show that the collaborative governance process that occurs in the "Waste Reduction Program" at Jabon Landfill, Sidoarjo only involves the community and informal organizations, not yet involving the private sector in its management.

The concept of Collaborative Government as an alternative basis is considered capable of realizing the acceleration and implementation of Tourism Areas. Collaborative Governance as a new paradigm that is used to deal with various issues in a complex society, the paradigm that is meant is the basic principle of equal relations between stakeholders in the public, private and community sectors. It is also a process that involves various stakeholders who are related to the interests or achieve a goal. This study analyzes Collaborative Governance in Sustainable Tourism Management, especially in Doplang Village. Then, this study uses qualitative research methods. The results of the research on the Doplang Tourism Village, Bawen District, Semarang Regency, are a source of income for the local community with the level of tourists visiting tourist attractions and also increasing people's income.

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk melihat collaborative governance terutama pada tahap pra bencana, dan sejauh mana kerjasama serta upaya-upaya yang telah dilakukan berbagai aktor untuk mengantisipasi bencana di Kabupaten Bima. Penelitian  ini  menggunakan  metode  deskriptif  kualitatif.  Subyek penelitian ini dipilih melalui teknik purposive sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data  terdiri  atas  observasi observation,  wawancara  dan  dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelenggaraan manajemen prabencana di Kabupaten Bima di lakukan dengan pendekatan collaboraive governance melaui prinsip koordinasi, keterpaduan, kemitraan, dan pemberdayaan. Dengan keterlibatan seluruh element sebagai perwujudan yang demokratis partisipatif dalam upaya penanggulangan bencana. Dalam pendekatan ini Badan Penanggulangan Bencana bertindak sebagai leading sector berupaya untuk mengimplementasikan program-program yang ada dalam Dokumen Rencana Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah dengan kerjasama lintas sektoral. Dalam implementasinya BPBD bertindak sebagai koordinator, fasilitator, motivator, sekaligus pelaksana program-program. Melalui kolaborasi tersebut menghasilkan strategi penanggulangan bencana melaui perkuatan aturan dan kapasitas kelembagaan yang difokuskan untuk mencapai penguatan kerangka Hukum penyelenggaraan Penanggulangan Bencana dan peningkatan kapasitas serta akuntabilitas tata kelola penanggulangan bencana. Proses kerjasama ini juga telah mengintegrasikan Rencana Penanggulangan Bencana (RPB) kedalam rencana strategis dan rencana kerja tahunan seluruh SKPD. Pemerintah Daerah juga bekerjasama dengan perguruan tinggi dalam mengembangkan hasil-hasil riset yang dapat diterapkan secara langsung oleh Pemerintah, individu dan keluarga seperti pembangunan rumah aman Gempa, sumur resapan dan lainnya. Diharapkan dengan adanya beberapa riset terkait penanggulangan bencana di Kabupaten Bima dapat menurunkan kerentanan daerah terhadap risiko multi bahaya.

Wisata Danau Rusa merupakan salah satu wisata yang dikembangkan oleh  Dinas Pariwisata dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Kampar. Konsep collaborative governance sangat penting dalam penerapan kolaborasi pengembangan destinasi wisata karena dalam kolaborasi ini tidak hanya melibatkan pemerintah saja, melainkan melibatkan masyarakat dan pokdarwis. Kolaborasi ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan wisata danau rusa di Kabupaten Kampar dan untuk meningkatkan pendapatan daerah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus yang bersifat deskriptif. Teori yang digunakan adalah teori Purwanti yaitu: 1.Principled Engagement (Keterlibatan Prinsip), 2. Shared Motivation (Motivasi Bersama), 3. Capacity for Join action (Kapasitas Untuk Bergabung). Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah program pengembangan destinasi wisata yang sudah berjalan dengan baik karena dibuktikan dengan adanya keterlibatan prinsip yang baik, motivasi bersama yang sudah dipahami, dan keterlibatan prinsip yang telah dijalankan oleh pihak yang berkolaborasi. Adapun faktor penghambatnya yaitu faktor sumber daya manusia, faktor partisipasi masyarakat dan anggaran yang minim.