Publication Search

PT Efrata Garmindo Utama Sukoharjo itself operates in the retail sector which makes batik clothes (men, women and children) with its flagship brand, namely Bateeq. This research is a survey with quantitative data, namely data on the number of employees and the number of respondents to the questionnaire. Primary data in this research is the result of distributing questionnaires given to employees of PT Efrata Garmindo Utama. The population in this study were all employees of PT Efrata Garmindo Utama, totaling 502 employees. The sample in this study was narrowed using the Slovin formula to 85 respondents using a purposive sampling technique. The data collection technique uses a questionnaire. Test research instruments with validity and reliability tests, classic assumption tests including multicollinearity tests, autocorrelation tests, heteroscedasticity tests and normality tests. The data analysis method uses descriptive analysis, multiple linear regression test, t test, F test and R² test. The results of the validity test for all instruments obtained a significance value = 0.000 < 0.05, meaning that all instruments were valid. Reliability test results for all reliable variables. The results of the multicollinearity test, autocorrelation test, heteroscedasticity test, normality test for all variables passed the test. The results of the multiple linear regression test obtained the regression equation Y = 17.062 + 27.571 X₁ – 47.771 X₂ + 0.013 The results of the t test for the work ethic variable have no significant effect on employee performance with ρ-value = 0.378 > 0.05. Work discipline has a significant effect on employee performance with ρ-value = 0.012 < 0.05. Work motivation has a significant effect on employee performance with ρ-value = 0.000< 0.05. The results of the F test show a calculated F of 34.876 with a ρ-value of 0.000 < 0.05, meaning that the model used to test the influence of the independent variables is variable X1 (work ethic), variable X2 (work discipline) and variable X3 (work motivation) on The dependent variable, namely employee performance (Y), is correct. The R² test results obtained a value (Adjusted R²) of 0.574, meaning that the contribution of the independent influence of variable X1 (work ethic), variable X2 (work discipline) and variable X3 (work motivation) to Y (employee performance) was 54.7%. The remainder (100% - 54.7%) = 45.3% is explained by other variables outside the model, for example quality of work life, workload, work environment, job satisfaction and leadership style.

Human resources (HR) are very important in an organization, therefore every organization always strives to have quality human resources. Quality human resources in an organization will not work well. Human resources and the organization must have a mutually necessary relationship, the organization needs quality employees and the organization should pay attention to work aspects related to human resources. employee performance at the West Sumatra Province Civil Service Agency (BKD) has not yet reached the target. The research population is all employees. The sampling technique is a saturated sample obtained as many as 72 samples. The analysis tool used is Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). So the results of this study indicate that (1) work motivation has a positive and significant effect (0.162) on job satisfaction at the Regional Civil Service Agency of West Sumatra Province. (2) The work environment has a positive and significant effect (0.000) on job satisfaction at the Regional Civil Service Agency of West Sumatra Province. (3) Work motivation has a positive and significant effect (0.000) on employee performance at the West Sumatra Provincial Civil Service Agency. (4) Work environment has a positive and not significant effect (0.006) on employee performance at the Regional Civil Service Agency of West Sumatra Province. (5) Job satisfaction has a positive and significant effect (0.014) on employee performance at the Regional Civil Service Agency of West Sumatra Province. (6) Work motivation has a positive and significant effect (0.176) on employee performance through job satisfaction at the Regional Civil Service Agency of West Sumatra Province. (7) The work environment has a positive and significant effect (0.018) on employee performance through job satisfaction at the West Sumatra Provincial Civil Service Agency. (8) The contribution of work motivation and work environment variables to job satisfaction is 0.888 or 88.8% and the remaining 11.2% is influenced by other variables not examined in this study at the West Sumatra Provincial Civil Service Agency. (9) The contribution of competency, workload and job satisfaction variables to employee performance is 0.843 or 84.3% and the remaining 15.7% is influenced by other variables not examined by this study at the West Sumatra Provincial Civil Service Agency.      

The Influence of Work Environment, Workload, and Motivation on Employee Performance at PT. Sun Hope Indonesia. This research aims to find out how much influence the work environment, workload and motivation have on employee performance which has an impact on PT. Sun Hope Indonesia This type of research is quantitative. The population in this study were all employees of PT. Sun Hope Indonesia in Jakarta. The sampling technique used Probability Sampling, data collection through distributing questionnaires directly and via Google from to 60 respondents, with data processing using SPSS version 27. Data that met the requirements was obtained using validity and reliability tests and classic assumption tests. The data analysis techniques used are multiple linear regression, t statistical test (partial), F test (simultaneous) and determatic test (R2). Based on the results of this research, it is stated that the Work Environment, Workload and Motivation simultaneously have a significant effect on the performance of PT employees. Sun Hope Indonesia. As well as the Work Environment variable partially having a positive and significant influence on employee performance and the Workload variable having a positive and significant influence on Employee Performance, the Motivation Variable having a positive and significant influence on Employee Performance. Based on this, it can be concluded that it is proven that the work environment, work load and motivation have a positive influence on employee performance. Each and every level of Work Environment, Workload, and Motivation has a positive influence on employee performance.