Publication Search

This research aims to analyze the influence of inventory intensity, institutional ownership and capital intensity on tax aggressiveness with independent commissioners as a moderating variable in basic industrial and chemical companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2019-2023. The research sample consisted of 24 companies with a total of 120 sample data. This research uses secondary data in the form of company financial reports. The sampling technique uses purposive sampling technique with certain criteria. The data analysis method uses panel data regression using Eviews 12th. The research results show that inventory intensity and institutional ownership have no influence on tax aggressiveness. Meanwhile, capital intensity has a positive effect on tax aggressiveness. Apart from that, independent commissioners are unable to moderate the influence of inventory intensity and institutional ownership on tax aggressiveness. However, independent commissioners are able to weaken the influence of capital intensity on tax aggressiveness.

Companies perceive taxes as a burdensome expense, which can diminish potential profits. As corporate taxpayers, companies have a responsibility to pay taxes in accordance with applicable laws. Tax aggressiveness refers to tactics employed by companies to manage or manipulate the magnitude of the tax burden they must bear, aiming to reduce their actual tax obligations without violating the law. This research examines the relationship between ownership concentration, tax risk, and corporate risk on tax aggressiveness, with accrual earnings management as a moderation variable. Data analysis is conducted using descriptive statistics with a quantitative approach. The research findings indicate that ownership concentration, tax risk, and corporate risk positively influence tax aggressiveness. Additionally, accrual earnings management can weaken the impact of ownership concentration, tax risk, and corporate risk on tax aggressiveness.

This research examines the simultaneous and partial effects of tunneling incentives, thin capitalization, financial distress, and earnings management on tax aggressiveness in Indonesian manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2017 to 2021. Purposive sampling was conducted on a sample population of 213 manufacturing companies to obtain 420 observations. Eviews 12 software was utilized for the panel data regression analysis. The analysis of this research reveals that tax aggressiveness is simultaneously influenced by tunneling incentives, thin capitalization, financial distress, and earnings management. Partially, thin capitalization, financial distress, and earnings management have a positive effect on tax aggressiveness, but tunneling incentives have no effect.

This research was conducted to analyze the effect of Liquidity, Profitability, Leverage and Operating Costs on Tax Aggressiveness in Transportation and Logistics sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2011 – 2021. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling so that the number of samples used in the study were 15 companies. The data analysis method in this study uses panel data regression analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that Liquidity, Profitability and Leverage have a negative effect on Tax Aggressiveness. Meanwhile, operational costs have a positive influence on tax aggressiveness

This study aims to find empirical evidence about the effect of corporate governance on tax aggressiviness with the disclosure of corporate social responsibility as a moderating variable seen from the financial statements listed on the IDX. The sampel data is 193 annual financial reports in 2016-2020. The analysis was carried out using multiple linear regression analysis and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) with the SPSS version 21 program. Based on the results of data analysis and discussion conducted, it can be concluded that corporate governance has a positive effect on tax aggressiviness. Corporate social responsibility can weaken the negative influence of corporate governance on tax aggressiveness.

This study aims to determine the effect of leverage, fixed asset intensity, and firm size on tax aggressiveness. The population in this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2017-2020 period. The sample of this research was taken using non-probability sampling method with purposive sampling technique and certain criteria. The method used in this research is panel data regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that leverage has a significant positive effect on tax aggressiveness, while the intensity of fixed assets has no effect on tax aggressiveness, and firm size has a significant positive effect on tax aggressiveness. The implications of the results of this study provide input to companies in making decisions to minimize the tax burden paid so that companies can be more aggressive towards taxes.

Tax aggressiveness is the actions taken by the company to reduce its tax obligations. A company is said to carry out tax aggressiveness if the company tries to reduce the tax burden aggressively, either using legal methods, namely tax avoidance or illegal methods such as tax evasion. Although not all tax planning actions are carried out illegally, the more loopholes a company uses to avoid taxes, the more aggressive the company is considered. And this study aims to examine the relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable of this study. The independent variables are liquidity, ROA, leverage and firm size and the dependent variable is tax aggressiveness. And for the analytical method used is regression analysis, and descriptive analysis. Descriptive statistics are used to describe or describe the variables in the study. Descriptive statistics used are measures of tax aggressiveness of all sample companies. The description of the variables can be seen from the mean and standard deviation. The descriptive statistical test was carried out with the SPSS program. The results of the study found that liquidity has no effect on tax aggressiveness, then Renturn on Assets (ROA) affects tax aggressiveness, then leverage affects tax aggressiveness and company size affects tax aggressiveness.   Keywords: Liquidity, ROA, Leverage, Company Size, Tax Aggressiveness

Tax aggressiveness is the way to minimize the tax expense by tax avoidance and tax evasion. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of good corporate governance as proxied by institutional ownership and managerial ownership, as well as corporate social responsibility on the tax aggressiveness of mining companies listed on the IDX in 2015-2019 through earnings management as an intervention variable. The method of determining the sample using purposive sampling technique, in order to obtain a sample of 7 companies with 35 observational data. The type of data used is secondary data from annual mining company reports. Data were analyzed using SEM PLS with PLS 6.0 software program. The results prove that institutional ownership has a negative effect on tax aggressiveness, while managerial ownership, CSR, and earnings management have no effect on tax aggressiveness. CSR has a positive effect on management earnings, while institutional ownership and managerial ownership do not have effect on earnings management. Institutional ownership, managerial ownership, and CSR do not have effect on tax aggressiveness through earnings management