Publication Search

The development of digital da'wah demands a more in-depth, comprehensive, and data-driven methodological approach. However, contemporary da'wah research is still dominated by descriptive analysis that stops at mapping surface phenomena without exploring the underlying causal factors that determine the long-term effectiveness of da'wah. This weakness is increasingly apparent in the use of SWOT analysis, which has been widely applied in da'wah studies, but tends to be limited to producing categorization tables without an operational epistemic basis. Meanwhile, the era of digital da'wah presents a new, complex reality, where da'wah success is influenced not only by surface interactions such as the number of viewers, impressions, or follower growth, but also by latent factors such as audience cognitive motivation, platform algorithms, digital cultural context, identity construction, and societal value systems. This study aims to formulate a new methodological model through the integration of SWOT and the Iceberg approach to address this methodological stagnation. The research was conducted using qualitative methods based on literature analysis, comparative studies of strategic analysis models, and the construction of a conceptual model. The results show that the SWOT-Iceberg integration is able to produce a more multidimensional framework for digital da'wah analysis: SWOT diagnoses surface symptoms, while Iceberg explores patterns, causal structures, and mental models that shape phenomena. This combined model enables the development of more accurate, adaptive, and evidence-based da'wah strategies. It is concluded that the SWOT–Iceberg integration significantly contributes to the development of modern da'wah methodology by encouraging a shift from descriptive research to transformative diagnostic analysis, while simultaneously strengthening the scientific character of da'wah as an academic discipline based on a critical and measurable knowledge system.

The Police Record Certificate (SKCK) policy as one of the requirements in the labor recruitment process often becomes an obstacle for former convicts to obtain employment. In fact, the right to work is part of human rights (HAM) that should be guaranteed for every individual, including those who have completed their sentence. This study analyzes the impact of the SKCK policy on employment opportunities for former convicts and how its elimination can be a progressive step in realizing human rights equality. This study uses a normative legal approach by examining related regulations, human rights principles, and comparative studies with other countries that have implemented inclusive policies for former convicts in the world of work. The results of the study show that the SKCK policy in job recruitment has the potential to discriminate against former convicts and strengthen social stigma, thus hindering their reintegration process into society. The elimination or at least reform of the SKCK policy to be more inclusive is expected to open up fairer access to employment, strengthen social rehabilitation, and reduce the rate of recidivism. Therefore, changes in regulations and policies are needed that better support the fulfillment of the rights of former convicts to obtain equal employment opportunities.

Guarantee fiduciary guarantees play an important role in economic financing in Indonesia. However, implementation of fiduciary guarantee execution often leads to legal conflicts, especially the abuse of executorial power by creditors. Court Decision Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 changes the execution mechanism to better protect the rights of debtors and emphasize the principle of justice. protect the rights of debtors and emphasize the principle of justice. This raises the need to reformulate Perkap No. 8/2011 to be relevant to the changes.changes. Research This research uses a normative method that analyzes the relevant laws and regulations related laws and regulations, the principles of justice, and their compatibility with social dynamics. The focus is to review the relevance and weaknesses of Perkap No. 8/2011 after the Constitutional Court Decision. The Constitutional Court's ruling limits unilateral execution and requires an acknowledgment of default or a court decision before execution. default or court decision before execution is carried out. This increases the protection of debtors' rights, but also adds procedural burdens for creditors. for creditors. The reformulation of Perkap No. 8/2011 is necessary to ensure that execution is more fair and lawful. The reformulation should include mechanisms that prioritize legality, protection of debtor rights, and oversight of abuse. monitoring against abuse. Synergy between the court, the police, and related parties need to be strengthened to create a balanced and transparent legal ecosystem and transparent.

Kepemimpinan Kristen merupakan sebuah kepemimpinan yang perlu diterpakan dengan baik dan sesuai berlandaskan Alkitabiah. Seorang pemimpin Kristen yang tidak sesuai dengan landasannya yaitu Alkitab maka tidak disebut sebagai kepemimpinan Kristen. Salah satu upaya untuk menjadikan kepemimpinan Kristen ini sebagai pemimpin Kristen yang baik dan benar adalah seorang pemimpin Kristen harus memimpin dengan berpedoman kepada para pemimpin terdahulu yang telah dituliskan di dalam Alkitab. Ada banyak para pemimpin yang baik dan disenangi oleh orang-orang yang mereka pimpin yang diceritakan di dalam Alkitab, salah satunya adalah Daud. Daud memimpin bangsa Israel pada masanya dengan baik, karena ia adalah pemimpin yang taat serta tunduk kepada Tuhan yang telah mengutus dia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah membandingkan bentuk kepemimpinan Kristen masa kini yang cenderung tidak sesuai dengan apa yang seharusnya dilakukan oleh seorang pemimpin Kristen. Oleh sebab itu, melalui tulisan ini, pemimpin di harapkan dapat menjadi pemimpin yang dapat berguna bagi manusia dan juga bagi  Tuhan. Dengan mempedomani bentuk kepemimpinan seperti Daud ini, maka akan dapat menghasilkan kepemimpinan yang baik dan menciptakan kesejahteraan di tegah umat Tuhan.

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji penerapan asas kepentingan terbaik bagi anak dalam kebijakan reformulasi berhubungan dengan anak korban tindak perkosaan, serta mengevaluasi perluasan bentuk tindak pidana kejahatan persetubuhan terhadap anak yang dapat dilakukan aborsi ditinjau asas kepentingan terbaik bagi anak. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan tipe penelitian yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua pendekatan yakni pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan yaitu bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode berfikir deduktif serta melakukan studi kepustakaan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka. Penelitian ini berkesimpulan (1) Dibutuhkan 2 alat bukti sebagai bukti dari adanya perkosaan, sehingga hal tersebut memberikan ruang penguatan dari segi hukum disamping adanya konseling yang dtentukan sebagai syarat diperbolehkannya aborsi; (2) supaya asas kepentingan terbaik bagi anak dapat diterapkan terhadap anak korban tindak pidana yang akan melakukan aborsi, di dalam UU Kesehatan harus segera direformulasi yang mengatur mengenai kualifikasi tentang anak korban peresetubuhan yang dapat dilakukan aborsi tidak hanya korban perkosaan saja, hal ini bertujuan agar apa yang menjadi tujuan pemerintah untuk menjaga dan melindungi hak-hak anak.    

This article discusses the civilian aspect in defamation cases which is intended to reform law enforcement against defamation cases. This article uses normative research methods and uses a legislative approach. Defamation is indeed an act that violates the law and certainly harms the person whose reputation is tarnished, but with this loss, it is seen that it is possible to resolve this issue can be resolved through a civil law approach with aspects of illegal acts. This is because the application of criminal sanctions is the ultimate medium, and also of course the essence is to look at the resolution of the problem. Reformulation of law enforcement policy in defamation cases leading to civil settlement is of course intended so that the aggrieved person also receives compensation from the perpetrator, and also the perpetrator is obliged to pay compensation, so as not to release the perpetrator of defamation for the act committed, but not in the presence of criminal sanctions law enforcement.