Publication Search

This study aimed to examine the tax aggressiveness through the components of financial ratios namely liquidity, leverage, profitability, and corporate size in manufacturing companies of consumer goods sub-impurities on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2015-2018. The selection of samples uses proposive sampling with the criteria of consumer goods subsector companies that report complete finances and companies earn profits. Based on these criteria, a sample of 98 observations was obtained. Analytical techniques use multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that liquidity negatively affects tax aggressiveness, leverage negatively affects tax aggressiveness, profitability positively affects tax aggressiveness, and corporate size negatively affects tax aggressiveness. Keywords:  Tax Aggressiveness, Liquidity, Leverage, Profitability, Size of Fir  

This study aims to analyze the determinants of capital structure in manufacturing industries listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The data used is taken from the financial statements of manufacturing companies whose shares are still actively traded on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The variables used are profitability proxied by return on equity (ROE), sales growth, asset structure, liquidity proxied by current ratio (CR), tax, business risk and capital structure proxied by debt-to-equity ratio (DER). Sampling using purposive sampling method, and data analysis using multiple regression. The results show that liquidity (current ratio) has a negative effect on capital structure at a significance of less than 1%. Meanwhile, profitability (return on equity), sales growth, asset structure, tax and business risk have no effect on capital structure.  Keywords: profitabilias, sales growth, asset structure, liquidity, tax, business risk, capital structur

The purpose of this research is to test and prove the factors that influence the timeliness of the company's financial reporting. The variables used in this study are profitability, leverage, and liquidity as independent variables, while the timeliness of the presentation of financial statements as the dependent variable. The population in this case research is a retail trade sub-sector company registered in Indonesia Stock Exchange 2015-2019. This study uses secondary data obtained from www.idx.co.id and related company websites. The data taken is company data for the 2015-2019 period with using purposive sampling, so that the total sample obtained is 7 companies. The analysis technique in this research is multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS 25 software. The results showed that profitability and leverage did not affect the timeliness of the presentation of financial statements, while liquidity affects the timeliness of financial statement presentation.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of profitability, liquidity, company growth, dividend policy and tax avoidance (study on the manufacturing sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange). The population in this study were all manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2016-2019 period, totaling 76 companies. The data collection method used in this research is documentation. The source of data in this study is secondary data in the form of financial reports published on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The data analysis technique used was multiple linear regression which was preceded by classical assumption test consisting of normality test, multicollinearity test, autocorrelation test and heteroscedasticity test. While hypothesis testing is done by using the coefficient of determination, t test and F test. In this study, the results of the analysis show that profitability has effect on firm value, liquidity has no effect on firm value, firm growth has no effect on firm value, dividend policy has effect on firm value, and tax avoidance has  effect on firm value.

This study aims to examine the phenomenon of debt in state enterprises (BUMN) which is excessive without being followed by an increase in profitability. The sample used is state-owned enterprises (BUMN), the various business sectors for the 2015-2018 period. Using purposive sampling got 137 samples and data processing using the IBM SPSS series 23 program. The result is that debt policy has a negative impact on profitability; it does not prove liquidity to affect profitability. It does not prove liquidity to determine dividends. Debt policy has a negative effect on dividends, and profitability has a positive effect on dividends.

This study discusses the effect of risk and capital on profitability of banks issued on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period of 2013-2017. The data used is panel data, which is a combination of time series data and cross section data. The method of taking data uses purposive sampling. Technical analysis was performed using multiple regression analysis. The results of the study show that credit risk (NPL) and operational risk (BOPO) have a negative and significant effect on profitability (ROA). While liquidity risk (LDR), market risk (NIM), and capital (CAR) do not affect on profitability (ROA). Furthermore credit risk (NPL), operational risk (BOPO) and capital (CAR) have a negative and significant effect on profitability (ROE), while liquidity risk (LDR) and market risk (NIM) do not affect on profitability (ROE). Keywords: profitability, liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk, operational risk and capital.

This research is meant to test the influence of liquidity, profitability, and leverage to the firm value with the corporate social responsibility as the moderating variable. Firm value describes the prosperity of the shareholders. Liquidity, profitability, leverage and corporate social responsibility are the factors which can be a consideration for investors in investing. Methods that used in this research is quantitative method using secondary data obtained through the company’s financial statements. The result of the research shows that: 1) Liquidity has an influence to the firm value. 2) Profitabilitry has an influence to the firm value. 3) Leverage has an influence to the firm value. 4) Corporate social responsibility is unable to moderate the influence of liquidity to the firm value. 5) Corporate social responsibility is unable to moderate the influence of profitability to the firm value. 6) Corporate social responsibility is unable to moderate the influence of leverage to the firm value.